← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amantadine side effects: what 15,376 FDA adverse event reports show

Amantadine · 1,122 reaction terms · 64,680 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Lower incidence of these side effects than

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

15,376 reports · 60% serious · 1,632 with death outcome · 56% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Amantadine hydrochloride tablets are indicated for the prophylaxis and treatment of signs and symptoms of infection caused by various strains of influenza A virus. Amantadine hydrochloride tablets are also indicated in the treatment of parkinsonism and drug-induced extrapyramidal reactions.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Amantadine hydrochloride, USP is designated generically as amantadine hydrochloride and chemically as 1-adamantanamine hydrochloride. Amantadine hydrochloride, USP is a stable white or practically white crystalline powder, freely soluble in water, soluble in alcohol and in chloroform.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 2Not in label — unassessed 33
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,082 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyskinesia hyperpyrexia syndrome292,166.0
1,203.2–3,899.3ROR 2,170.1 · χ² 23,212 / p <1e-300
535.3 EB05 390.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Parkinsonism hyperpyrexia syndrome43425.1
301.8–598.7ROR 426.3 · χ² 13,502 / p <1e-300
282.6 EB05 218.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=43 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dopamine dysregulation syndrome47160.0
118.3–216.4ROR 160.5 · χ² 6,494 / p <1e-300
135.3 EB05 105.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · ♀ 29% (drug 56%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep brain stimulation61159.9
122.7–208.4ROR 160.5 · χ² 8,465 / p <1e-300
136.9 EB05 110.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · 90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Freezing phenomenon270110.7
97.9–125.2ROR 112.6 · χ² 27,015 / p <1e-300
101.6 EB05 91.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=184not reported in cached trials
Catheter site nodule11102.0
55.3–188.2ROR 102.1 · χ² 931 / p 1e-204
81.9 EB05 48.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9not reported in cached trials
Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder2591.1
60.8–136.5ROR 91.2 · χ² 2,003 / p <1e-300
80.3 EB05 57.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Spinal cord haematoma1388.7
50.6–155.5ROR 88.8 · χ² 977 / p 9e-215
74.5 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
On and off phenomenon30784.4
75.3–94.6ROR 86.1 · χ² 23,735 / p <1e-300
79.1 EB05 71.9 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=258not reported in cached trials
Stoma site odour1276.8
42.9–137.4ROR 76.9 · χ² 779 / p 9e-172
65.5 EB05 39.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Stoma site infection5965.2
50.2–84.6ROR 65.4 · χ² 3,495 / p <1e-300
61.0 EB05 49.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Stoma site erythema8363.3
50.8–78.8ROR 63.6 · χ² 4,801 / p <1e-300
59.7 EB05 49.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73not reported in cached trials
Stoma site hypergranulation2863.2
43.3–92.2ROR 63.3 · χ² 1,577 / p <1e-300
58.1 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26not reported in cached trials
Somatic delusion1162.9
34.4–115.2ROR 63.0 · χ² 583 / p 5e-129
54.8 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Stoma site pain5856.3
43.3–73.1ROR 56.5 · χ² 2,969 / p <1e-300
53.1 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50not reported in cached trials
Saliva discolouration1355.8
32.1–97.2ROR 55.9 · χ² 621 / p 3e-137
50.0 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Stoma site discharge10554.3
44.7–65.9ROR 54.6 · χ² 5,227 / p <1e-300
51.7 EB05 44.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88not reported in cached trials
Hyperkinesia7953.5
42.8–67.0ROR 53.8 · χ² 3,865 / p <1e-300
50.9 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=76 · ♀ 27% (drug 56%)not reported in cached trials
Device colour issue1449.4
29.0–84.2ROR 49.4 · χ² 595 / p 1e-131
45.0 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9not reported in cached trials
Duplicate therapy error1148.6
26.7–88.8ROR 48.7 · χ² 450 / p 3e-100
43.7 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Stoma site reaction2347.9
31.6–72.5ROR 47.9 · χ² 974 / p 3e-214
44.7 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 30% (drug 56%)not reported in cached trials
Stoma site extravasation1346.9
27.0–81.4ROR 46.9 · χ² 520 / p 2e-115
42.7 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Impulse-control disorder6544.4
34.7–56.8ROR 44.6 · χ² 2,628 / p <1e-300
42.5 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57not reported in cached trials
Reduced facial expression3143.5
30.4–62.2ROR 43.6 · χ² 1,206 / p 1e-264
41.2 EB05 30.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 29% (drug 56%)not reported in cached trials
Parkinsonian gait1942.9
27.2–67.8ROR 43.0 · χ² 714 / p 1e-157
40.1 EB05 27.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=17not reported in cached trials
Morphoea1338.2
22.0–66.4ROR 38.3 · χ² 423 / p 3e-94
35.5 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Dyskinesia (involuntary movements)1,08637.5
35.4–39.7ROR 40.3 · χ² 37,566 / p <1e-300
36.5 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.9not reported in cached trials
Resting tremor1736.6
22.6–59.3ROR 36.7 · χ² 539 / p 1e-119
34.4 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Stoma complication2534.2
23.0–50.9ROR 34.3 · χ² 754 / p 2e-166
32.7 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=21 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Livedo reticularis5033.5
25.3–44.3ROR 33.6 · χ² 1,505 / p <1e-300
32.3 EB05 25.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=23not reported in cached trials
Stoma site haemorrhage3431.1
22.2–43.7ROR 31.2 · χ² 940 / p 9e-207
30.0 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 32% (drug 56%) · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sleep talking3831.0
22.5–42.7ROR 31.1 · χ² 1,049 / p 2e-230
29.9 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Bradykinesia12830.6
25.7–36.4ROR 30.8 · χ² 3,553 / p <1e-300
29.8 EB05 25.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=117not reported in cached trials
Stoma site irritation1230.6
17.2–54.1ROR 30.6 · χ² 307 / p 5e-69
28.6 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Soft tissue mass1030.1
16.1–56.4ROR 30.2 · χ² 248 / p 4e-56
28.0 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Hypersexuality3929.6
21.6–40.6ROR 29.7 · χ² 1,026 / p 2e-225
28.6 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 25% (drug 56%)not reported in cached trials
Akinesia4228.2
20.8–38.3ROR 28.3 · χ² 1,054 / p 2e-231
27.4 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 29% (drug 56%)not reported in cached trials
Stoma site inflammation1528.0
16.8–46.8ROR 28.1 · χ² 357 / p 6e-80
26.6 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Infusion site nodule1726.2
16.2–42.3ROR 26.2 · χ² 380 / p 6e-85
25.1 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Amantadine as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fall1,7737.3
7.0–7.6ROR 8.1 · χ² 9,745 / p <1e-300
7.3 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.1not reported in cached trials
Hallucination (hallucinations)1,30824.2
23.0–25.5ROR 26.4 · χ² 28,657 / p <1e-300
23.8 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.7not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,2591.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 95 / p 1e-22
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)1,1001.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · χ² 512 / p 1e-113
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8NCT01227967: 18/314 (5.7%) on Amantadine
Dyskinesia (involuntary movements)1,08637.5
35.4–39.7ROR 40.3 · χ² 37,566 / p <1e-300
36.5 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.9not reported in cached trials
Dizziness9452.6
2.4–2.8ROR 2.7 · χ² 942 / p 3e-207
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1NCT01227967: 23/314 (7.3%) on Amantadine
Death8721.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Tremor (shaking)7996.6
6.1–7.0ROR 6.9 · χ² 3,787 / p <1e-300
6.5 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.4not reported in cached trials
Nausea6801.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0NCT01227967: 1/314 (0.3%) on Amantadine (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)6482.4
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 510 / p 3e-113
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated6262.8
2.6–3.1ROR 2.9 · χ² 748 / p 5e-165
2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials
Balance disorder6259.9
9.2–10.7ROR 10.3 · χ² 4,980 / p <1e-300
9.8 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9not reported in cached trials
Somnolence (drowsiness)6204.2
3.9–4.6ROR 4.3 · χ² 1,527 / p <1e-300
4.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.5not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amantadine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amantadine are fall, hallucination, fatigue, dyskinesia, dizziness, gait disturbance. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amantadine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Amantadine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amantadine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.