← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amikacin side effects: what 16,955 FDA adverse event reports show

Amikacin · Arikayce · 1,094 reaction terms · 67,147 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Aminoglycoside Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Arikayce

openFDA label

Who reports

16,955 reports · 82% serious · 3,387 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

LIMITED POPULATION: ARIKAYCE ® is indicated in adults, who have limited or no alternative treatment options, for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease as part of a combination antibacterial drug regimen in patients who do not achieve negative sputum cultures after a minimum of 6 consecutive months of a multidrug background regimen therapy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

The active ingredient in ARIKAYCE (amikacin liposome inhalation suspension) is amikacin sulfate USP, an aminoglycoside antibacterial.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISK OF INCREASED RESPIRATORY ADVERSE REACTIONS ARIKAYCE has been associated with an increased risk of respiratory adverse reactions including, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, hemoptysis, bronchospasm, exacerbation of underlying pulmonary disease that have led to hospitalizations in some cases [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.2 , 5.3 , 5.4) ] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 2Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 10Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,054 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vascular pseudoaneurysm thrombosis11838.2
389.0–1,805.8ROR 838.7 · χ² 4,965 / p <1e-300
266.9 EB05 159.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Neonatal candida infection11419.1
211.3–831.3ROR 419.4 · χ² 3,110 / p <1e-300
202.8 EB05 120.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Sputum decreased10338.7
168.1–682.3ROR 338.9 · χ² 2,377 / p <1e-300
176.5 EB05 102.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=9NCT01799993: 1/359 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Mycobacterial peritonitis17265.7
157.3–448.9ROR 266.0 · χ² 3,467 / p <1e-300
175.6 EB05 116.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=17not reported in cached trials
Geotrichum infection31211.1
144.2–309.1ROR 211.5 · χ² 5,349 / p <1e-300
162.3 EB05 119.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · ♀ 81% (drug 54%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Atypical mycobacterium test positive13191.0
106.4–342.6ROR 191.1 · χ² 1,963 / p <1e-300
133.4 EB05 82.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Post-tussive vomiting18161.4
98.7–263.8ROR 161.5 · χ² 2,394 / p <1e-300
124.1 EB05 83.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=18not reported in cached trials
Sputum increased219142.9
124.3–164.2ROR 144.7 · χ² 27,489 / p <1e-300
126.6 EB05 113.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=188 · 73% consumerNCT01799993: 1/359 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Bronchoscopy24139.3
91.4–212.5ROR 139.5 · χ² 2,835 / p <1e-300
114.0 EB05 80.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Ototoxicity183135.5
116.4–157.7ROR 136.9 · χ² 21,863 / p <1e-300
120.5 EB05 106.6 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=178 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Overgrowth fungal10132.5
69.0–254.5ROR 132.6 · χ² 1,062 / p 4e-233
97.9 EB05 56.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Hepatosplenic candidiasis14129.3
74.5–224.3ROR 129.4 · χ² 1,497 / p <1e-300
101.2 EB05 64.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary resection21116.9
74.7–182.9ROR 117.0 · χ² 2,097 / p <1e-300
97.5 EB05 67.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasis24110.0
72.5–167.0ROR 110.2 · χ² 2,279 / p <1e-300
93.7 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=24not reported in cached trials
Dependence on oxygen therapy36100.2
71.4–140.7ROR 100.4 · χ² 3,176 / p <1e-300
88.4 EB05 66.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=36 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sputum retention7196.8
76.1–123.2ROR 97.2 · χ² 6,150 / p <1e-300
87.7 EB05 71.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · 76% consumerNCT01799993: 1/359 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Device maintenance issue3171.9
50.0–103.2ROR 72.0 · χ² 1,979 / p <1e-300
65.3 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=31 · ♀ 77% (drug 54%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary cavitation3856.8
41.1–78.7ROR 57.0 · χ² 1,939 / p <1e-300
53.0 EB05 40.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38not reported in cached trials
Candida pneumonia1455.8
32.7–95.3ROR 55.8 · χ² 669 / p 9e-148
50.0 EB05 31.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Trichosporon infection1652.0
31.5–85.8ROR 52.1 · χ² 720 / p 8e-159
47.3 EB05 30.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Herpes zoster meningoencephalitis1449.9
29.3–85.1ROR 49.9 · χ² 598 / p 2e-132
45.2 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Necrotising enterocolitis neonatal1547.9
28.6–80.2ROR 47.9 · χ² 618 / p 1e-136
43.7 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis4247.6
35.0–64.8ROR 47.7 · χ² 1,801 / p <1e-300
45.0 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=42 · ♀ 78% (drug 54%)not reported in cached trials
Aphonia50746.6
42.7–50.9ROR 48.0 · χ² 21,771 / p <1e-300
44.9 EB05 41.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 35.4 · ♀ 87% (drug 54%) · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Moraxella infection1046.5
24.7–87.5ROR 46.6 · χ² 386 / p 3e-86
41.6 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Rhinocerebral mucormycosis1244.9
25.2–79.8ROR 44.9 · χ² 455 / p 3e-101
40.7 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Sputum abnormal2243.1
28.1–65.8ROR 43.1 · χ² 833 / p 2e-183
40.3 EB05 28.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=20 · ♀ 76% (drug 54%)NCT01799993: 1/359 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Acinetobacter infection3541.3
29.5–57.8ROR 41.4 · χ² 1,292 / p 4e-283
39.2 EB05 29.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Scedosporium infection2138.6
25.0–59.6ROR 38.7 · χ² 710 / p 1e-156
36.3 EB05 25.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Respiratory gas exchange disorder1137.8
20.7–68.8ROR 37.8 · χ² 347 / p 9e-78
34.7 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Amikacin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (4 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,0092.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.1 · χ² 2,540 / p <1e-300
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,7741.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 504 / p 8e-112
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0not reported in cached trials
Cough1,7067.6
7.2–7.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 9,808 / p <1e-300
7.5 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.0not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,6263.6
3.4–3.7ROR 3.8 · χ² 3,068 / p <1e-300
3.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9NCT01799993: 7/353 (2.0%) on Amikacin; 9/359 (2.5%) control
Therapy interrupted1,40525.7
24.4–27.0ROR 27.9 · χ² 32,734 / p <1e-300
25.2 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 37.2 · 83% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hospitalisation1,39611.4
10.9–12.0ROR 12.4 · χ² 13,242 / p <1e-300
11.3 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.1 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Death1,1381.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 291 / p 1e-65
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Dysphonia1,03022.2
20.9–23.5ROR 23.5 · χ² 20,494 / p <1e-300
21.8 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.1 · ♀ 82% (drug 54%) · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Nausea7791.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 32 / p 7e-9
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Product dose omission issue7703.4
3.1–3.6ROR 3.5 · χ² 1,281 / p 7e-281
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.8 · 85% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)7521.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 1.2 · 70% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pneumonia (lung infection)6812.6
2.4–2.8ROR 2.7 · χ² 683 / p 8e-151
2.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9NCT01799993: 5/353 (1.4%) on Amikacin; 5/359 (1.4%) control (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6691.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3NCT01799993: 27/353 (7.6%) on Amikacin; 33/359 (9.2%) control
Pyrexia (fever)6482.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 491 / p 5e-109
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9NCT01799993: 1/353 (0.3%) on Amikacin (serious AE)
Condition aggravated6312.6
2.4–2.8ROR 2.6 · χ² 620 / p 3e-137
2.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amikacin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amikacin are cough, dyspnoea, dysphonia, nausea, fatigue, pneumonia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amikacin have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF INCREASED RESPIRATORY ADVERSE REACTIONS ARIKAYCE has been associated with an increased risk of respiratory adverse reactions including, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, hemoptysis, bronchospasm, exacerbation of underlying pulmonary disease that have led to hospitalizations in some cases [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.2 , 5.3 , 5.4) ] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Amikacin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.