← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Bupivacaine side effects: what 9,290 FDA adverse event reports show

Bupivacaine · Exparel · 1,023 reaction terms · 30,547 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Amide Local Anesthetic

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Exparel

openFDA label

Who reports

9,290 reports · 75% serious · 578 with death outcome · 65% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

EXPAREL is indicated to produce postsurgical: Local analgesia via infiltration in patients aged 6 years and older Regional analgesia via an interscalene brachial plexus nerve block in adults Regional analgesia via a sciatic nerve block in the popliteal.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) is a sterile, non-pyrogenic white to off-white preservative-free aqueous suspension consisting of multivesicular liposomes containing bupivacaine. Bupivacaine is present at a concentration of 13.3 mg/mL.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 28
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 983 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Anterior spinal artery syndrome24890.7
555.0–1,429.3ROR 893.0 · χ² 14,605 / p <1e-300
421.7 EB05 298.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Maternal exposure during delivery252793.7
688.4–915.1ROR 815.8 · χ² 146,498 / p <1e-300
560.3 EB05 504.6 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=202 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Purtscher retinopathy13466.9
256.9–848.6ROR 467.5 · χ² 4,618 / p <1e-300
246.5 EB05 153.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Platelet aggregation inhibition15439.5
252.7–764.3ROR 440.2 · χ² 5,120 / p <1e-300
250.3 EB05 161.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity160412.8
349.2–488.1ROR 420.0 · χ² 55,107 / p <1e-300
334.5 EB05 293.2 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=159 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute macular neuroretinopathy25403.4
263.6–617.3ROR 404.5 · χ² 8,158 / p <1e-300
270.9 EB05 193.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 28% (drug 65%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Inspiratory capacity decreased36339.7
239.3–482.1ROR 341.0 · χ² 10,255 / p <1e-300
255.0 EB05 192.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 65%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Horner's syndrome10305.0
157.6–590.5ROR 305.3 · χ² 2,404 / p <1e-300
177.9 EB05 103.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during delivery73269.6
211.6–343.4ROR 271.7 · χ² 17,185 / p <1e-300
226.3 EB05 186.0 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=73 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Arthrofibrosis10265.1
137.6–510.5ROR 265.4 · χ² 2,121 / p <1e-300
163.7 EB05 95.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Parophthalmia23242.7
157.9–373.1ROR 243.3 · χ² 4,777 / p <1e-300
185.5 EB05 130.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Chondrolysis46242.1
178.7–328.0ROR 243.3 · χ² 9,747 / p <1e-300
200.4 EB05 156.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=44 · ♀ 43% (drug 65%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Vascular resistance systemic decreased12219.0
121.1–396.1ROR 219.3 · χ² 2,177 / p <1e-300
151.8 EB05 92.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Implant site extravasation64198.8
154.0–256.5ROR 200.1 · χ² 11,380 / p <1e-300
173.2 EB05 140.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48no trial data cached
Phrenic nerve paralysis17192.1
117.1–315.2ROR 192.5 · χ² 2,802 / p <1e-300
147.9 EB05 97.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Medical device site pain44191.7
141.0–260.7ROR 192.6 · χ² 7,512 / p <1e-300
164.1 EB05 127.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Lagophthalmos30178.1
122.9–258.2ROR 178.7 · χ² 4,730 / p <1e-300
149.5 EB05 109.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Spinal cord infarction31171.7
119.2–247.3ROR 172.3 · χ² 4,727 / p <1e-300
145.4 EB05 107.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Macular ischaemia10162.5
85.6–308.8ROR 162.7 · χ² 1,349 / p 1e-295
118.0 EB05 68.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Pulmonary air leakage10162.5
85.6–308.8ROR 162.7 · χ² 1,349 / p 1e-295
118.0 EB05 68.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Medical device site discharge10155.7
82.0–295.5ROR 155.9 · χ² 1,296 / p 5e-284
114.4 EB05 66.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Overlap syndrome44153.8
113.4–208.6ROR 154.5 · χ² 6,106 / p <1e-300
135.6 EB05 105.2 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Anaesthetic complication141125.7
106.2–148.8ROR 127.7 · χ² 16,399 / p <1e-300
117.2 EB05 101.9 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=115 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Cauda equina syndrome39119.9
87.0–165.4ROR 120.4 · χ² 4,253 / p <1e-300
108.0 EB05 82.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Systemic toxicity10117.8
62.4–222.5ROR 117.9 · χ² 992 / p 5e-218
92.7 EB05 53.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Rhythm idioventricular15109.1
65.0–183.2ROR 109.3 · χ² 1,431 / p <1e-300
92.2 EB05 59.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Brachial plexopathy10106.5
56.5–200.9ROR 106.7 · χ² 900 / p 6e-198
85.6 EB05 49.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10no trial data cached
Neuromuscular block prolonged16101.5
61.5–167.5ROR 101.7 · χ² 1,428 / p <1e-300
87.3 EB05 57.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Uterine atony11100.8
55.1–184.4ROR 100.9 · χ² 946 / p 4e-208
83.0 EB05 49.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect prolonged1894.5
59.0–151.4ROR 94.7 · χ² 1,509 / p <1e-300
83.0 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Procedural hypotension3390.4
63.9–127.9ROR 90.7 · χ² 2,718 / p <1e-300
82.9 EB05 61.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=23 · ♀ 90% (drug 65%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Myopathy toxic2286.4
56.5–132.2ROR 86.6 · χ² 1,706 / p <1e-300
77.8 EB05 54.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Arachnoiditis2481.1
54.0–121.8ROR 81.3 · χ² 1,755 / p <1e-300
73.9 EB05 52.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial data cached
Spinal cord oedema1275.7
42.6–134.5ROR 75.8 · χ² 785 / p 6e-173
65.9 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Device damage2675.0
50.8–110.8ROR 75.2 · χ² 1,765 / p <1e-300
69.1 EB05 49.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=25 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Postoperative ileus1874.4
46.5–118.9ROR 74.5 · χ² 1,191 / p 3e-261
67.1 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Procedural nausea2470.6
47.0–105.9ROR 70.8 · χ² 1,529 / p <1e-300
65.1 EB05 46.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=14no trial data cached
Labelled drug-drug interaction medication error24964.8
57.2–73.4ROR 66.5 · χ² 15,138 / p <1e-300
62.7 EB05 56.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)8952.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.5 · χ² 706 / p 6e-156
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Pain7702.8
2.6–3.0ROR 3.0 · χ² 934 / p 2e-205
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)7171.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 32 / p 6e-9
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Hypotension (low blood pressure)5416.1
5.6–6.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 2,324 / p <1e-300
6.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.0 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Nausea4101.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 11 / p 5e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia (numbness)3795.7
5.2–6.3ROR 5.9 · χ² 1,479 / p <1e-300
5.7 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy3749.6
8.7–10.6ROR 10.0 · χ² 2,876 / p <1e-300
9.5 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy33512.2
11.0–13.6ROR 12.6 · χ² 3,432 / p <1e-300
12.1 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug withdrawal syndrome2817.2
6.4–8.0ROR 7.4 · χ² 1,487 / p <1e-300
7.1 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Vomiting2761.3
1.2–1.5ROR 1.3 · χ² 23 / p 1e-6
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Maternal exposure during delivery252793.7
688.4–915.1ROR 815.8 · χ² 146,498 / p <1e-300
560.3 EB05 504.6 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=202 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%) · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Labelled drug-drug interaction medication error24964.8
57.2–73.4ROR 66.5 · χ² 15,138 / p <1e-300
62.7 EB05 56.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.2no trial data cached
Overdose2352.5
2.2–2.8ROR 2.5 · χ² 202 / p 3e-46
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy2266.3
5.5–7.2ROR 6.4 · χ² 1,002 / p 3e-220
6.2 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.0 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
No adverse event2182.8
2.4–3.2ROR 2.8 · χ² 248 / p 4e-56
2.8 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Bupivacaine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Bupivacaine are pain, hypotension, nausea, hypoaesthesia, drug withdrawal syndrome, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Bupivacaine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Bupivacaine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Bupivacaine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.