← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ceftriaxone Sodium side effects: what 38,124 FDA adverse event reports show

Ceftriaxone Sodium · Ceftriaxone And Dextrose · 1,259 reaction terms · 142,548 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cephalosporin antibacterial

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Ceftriaxone And Dextrose

openFDA label

Who reports

38,124 reports · 94% serious · 6,744 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Ceftriaxone for Injection and Dextrose Injection is indicated for the treatment of the following infections when caused by susceptible bacteria. Ceftriaxone for Injection and Dextrose Injection is a cephalosporin antibacterial indicated for the treatme.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Ceftriaxone for Injection and Dextrose Injection is a sterile, nonpyrogenic, single-dose, packaged combination of Ceftriaxone Sodium and Dextrose Injection (diluent) in the DUPLEX® sterile container. The DUPLEX® Container is a flexible dual chamber container.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 5Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,219 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pseudocholelithiasis10313,949.6
5,137.9–37,873.3ROR 13,987.3 · calibrated p 4e-23 ✓
476.0 EB05 403.7 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=89 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicolith3072,445.8
1,881.1–3,179.9ROR 2,465.6 · calibrated p 1e-21 ✓
432.3 EB05 393.2 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=307 · ♀ 6% (drug 47%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy911,760.6
1,152.8–2,688.9ROR 1,764.8 · calibrated p 7e-19 ✓
381.6 EB05 320.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=91 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy1281,238.2
904.7–1,694.8ROR 1,242.4 · calibrated p 1e-17 ✓
357.3 EB05 308.3 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=128 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy148517.3
413.0–647.8ROR 519.3 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓
256.3 EB05 223.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=148 · ♀ 12% (drug 47%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug therapy147471.2
377.8–587.6ROR 473.0 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
244.5 EB05 213.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=147 · ♀ 12% (drug 47%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Factor v inhibition67285.8
212.6–384.2ROR 286.3 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
178.0 EB05 145.0 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage 061280.0
205.6–381.4ROR 280.5 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
174.9 EB05 141.1 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy89260.6
202.4–335.5ROR 261.2 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
169.9 EB05 142.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=89 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Congenital hiatus hernia64223.7
167.2–299.2ROR 224.1 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
151.5 EB05 122.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Penile abscess25188.1
119.4–296.4ROR 188.2 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
126.6 EB05 90.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials
Jarisch-herxheimer reaction168169.5
142.6–201.5ROR 170.2 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
127.5 EB05 112.1 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=162 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Postrenal failure95150.0
119.6–188.3ROR 150.4 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
115.0 EB05 96.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=95 · ♀ 24% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Acquired factor v deficiency22135.4
84.9–216.1ROR 135.5 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
99.4 EB05 69.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bacteroides infection47121.8
88.8–167.1ROR 122.0 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
95.9 EB05 75.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=47 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Clostridium test positive27378.7
69.3–89.3ROR 79.2 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
68.5 EB05 61.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=273 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary function test abnormal18071.6
61.3–83.6ROR 71.9 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
63.0 EB05 55.6 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=180 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials
Renal papillary necrosis2468.1
44.5–104.1ROR 68.1 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
57.9 EB05 41.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Disseminated strongyloidiasis2365.6
42.5–101.1ROR 65.6 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
56.0 EB05 39.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hyperphosphataemia19154.4
46.9–63.1ROR 54.7 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
49.3 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=191 · ♀ 15% (drug 47%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Microsporidia infection3254.3
37.8–78.1ROR 54.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
48.2 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pleocytosis5051.9
38.8–69.3ROR 52.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.7 EB05 36.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 69% (drug 47%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vitamin k deficiency3451.3
36.1–72.9ROR 51.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
45.8 EB05 34.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Trichosporon infection3248.3
33.6–69.3ROR 48.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.4 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood phosphorus increased22048.3
42.1–55.4ROR 48.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
44.2 EB05 39.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=220 · ♀ 10% (drug 47%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pneumococcal infection4646.8
34.6–63.2ROR 46.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
42.4 EB05 33.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=46 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials
Disseminated aspergillosis3544.3
31.4–62.5ROR 44.3 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
40.2 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vancomycin infusion reaction2744.1
29.8–65.2ROR 44.1 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
39.8 EB05 28.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chest x-ray abnormal21941.8
36.4–47.9ROR 42.0 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
38.7 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=219 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials
Disseminated mucormycosis2741.1
27.8–60.8ROR 41.1 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
37.3 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Calculus ureteric5040.1
30.1–53.5ROR 40.2 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
36.9 EB05 29.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=50 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intensive care unit acquired weakness2538.5
25.6–57.7ROR 38.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
35.1 EB05 25.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic5837.1
28.4–48.4ROR 37.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.4 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Generalised bullous fixed drug eruption2336.9
24.2–56.2ROR 36.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
33.7 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Choreoathetosis4336.7
27.0–50.0ROR 36.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.0 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Corynebacterium infection3133.9
23.6–48.8ROR 34.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
31.4 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Kounis syndrome13033.5
28.1–40.0ROR 33.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
31.5 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=130 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood gases abnormal2931.5
21.7–45.8ROR 31.5 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
29.3 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=29 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials
Breath sounds abnormal26230.8
27.2–34.9ROR 31.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.1 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=262 · ♀ 82% (drug 47%)not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Ceftriaxone as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,8972.5
2.4–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.754
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,5491.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.663
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,5911.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.689
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated1,5852.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.633
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,3302.3
2.2–2.4ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.896
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,2631.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.641
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Nausea1,2530.9
0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.224
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0NCT03959527: 12/308 (3.9%) on Ceftriaxone
Drug interaction1,1544.0
3.8–4.3ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.357
4.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,1361.0
0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.288
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0NCT03959527: 22/308 (7.1%) on Ceftriaxone
Sepsis (blood infection)1,0915.4
5.1–5.7ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.183
5.4 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rash1,0831.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.566
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypotension (low blood pressure)9992.8
2.6–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.695
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methotrexate Sodium ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ceftriaxone?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ceftriaxone are pyrexia, acute kidney injury, dyspnoea, pneumonia, vomiting, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ceftriaxone have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Ceftriaxone has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ceftriaxone causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.