← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ciprofloxacin Tablets side effects: what 71,199 FDA adverse event reports show

Ciprofloxacin Tablets · 1,234 reaction terms · 328,566 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Fluoroquinolone antibacterial

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

71,199 reports · 88% serious · 7,869 with death outcome · 55% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial indicated in adults (18 years of age and older) with the following infections caused by designated, susceptible bacteria and in pediatric patients where indicated: • Skin and Skin Structure Infections ( Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Ciprofloxacin Tablets, USP are synthetic antimicrobial agents for oral administration. Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, USP, a fluoroquinolone, is the monohydrochloride monohydrate salt of 1-cyclopropyl- 6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)- 3-quinolinecarboxylic acid.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS INCLUDING TENDINITIS, TENDON RUPTURE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM EFFECTS AND EXACERBATION OF MYASTHENIA GRAVIS • Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been assoc.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 2Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,194 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence96135.0
106.0–171.9ROR 135.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
90.8 EB05 76.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=96 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Geotrichum infection56105.3
77.6–143.0ROR 105.4 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
75.6 EB05 60.4 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder16352.5
44.5–62.0ROR 52.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
44.4 EB05 39.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=163not reported in cached trials
Dysbiosis11348.3
39.6–58.9ROR 48.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
41.3 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=113not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia64847.3
43.6–51.4ROR 47.7 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
40.8 EB05 38.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=648not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary35047.2
42.1–52.8ROR 47.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
40.6 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=350not reported in cached trials
Tendon disorder83042.8
39.8–46.0ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
37.4 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=769not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion38442.1
37.8–46.8ROR 42.3 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
36.8 EB05 33.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=384 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Crystal nephropathy6939.2
30.5–50.4ROR 39.2 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
34.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tendonitis1,75237.3
35.5–39.2ROR 38.2 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
33.2 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 25.5not reported in cached trials
Nasal oedema19736.3
31.3–42.1ROR 36.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.3 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=197 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Small fibre neuropathy7835.1
27.8–44.4ROR 35.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.2 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Joint noise16928.1
24.0–32.8ROR 28.1 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
25.6 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=160 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Female genital tract fistula13725.4
21.3–30.2ROR 25.5 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=137 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Joint crepitation15524.5
20.8–28.9ROR 24.6 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=148not reported in cached trials
Chronic fatigue syndrome10423.8
19.5–29.0ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
22.0 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=103 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tendon rupture (torn tendon)89422.9
21.4–24.5ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
21.3 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 14.6not reported in cached trials
Connective tissue disorder10022.2
18.1–27.2ROR 22.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.6 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98not reported in cached trials
Pouchitis5921.6
16.6–28.1ROR 21.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.0 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease1,24321.3
20.1–22.5ROR 21.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.9 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9not reported in cached trials
Epicondylitis9419.5
15.9–24.1ROR 19.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
18.3 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=94 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pseudomembranous colitis13218.4
15.4–21.9ROR 18.4 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.3 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=132 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vanishing bile duct syndrome6117.1
13.2–22.1ROR 17.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.1 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Radiculopathy13716.1
13.5–19.1ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.3 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=137 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Acinetobacter infection5616.0
12.2–21.0ROR 16.0 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.1 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Clostridium test positive10815.3
12.6–18.6ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.5 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=108 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tubulointerstitial nephritis89414.7
13.8–15.7ROR 14.9 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.0 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 11.5 · serious PRR 9.2not reported in cached trials
Pathogen resistance43014.6
13.2–16.0ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.9 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.5 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Proctitis13114.4
12.1–17.1ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.7 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=131 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Fistula discharge5914.3
11.0–18.6ROR 14.3 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.5 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Plantar fasciitis15314.0
11.9–16.4ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.3 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=149 · 70% consumernot reported in cached trials
Weight bearing difficulty12213.9
11.6–16.6ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.2 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=119not reported in cached trials
Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder7213.7
10.9–17.4ROR 13.8 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.0 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Linear iga disease7313.5
10.7–17.0ROR 13.5 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.8 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Tendon disorder4,34737.836.7–39.0signal
Severe cutaneous reaction1,8787.67.3–8.0signal
Kidney injury7,3794.84.7–4.9signal
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis2,6543.23.1–3.3signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy8012.92.7–3.1signal
Hyponatraemia7272.72.5–2.9signal
Arrhythmia / qt1,7132.62.5–2.7signal
Serious infection6,7552.62.5–2.6signal
Depression2,2932.42.3–2.5signal
Liver injury2,4172.42.3–2.5signal
Thrombocytopenia1,6932.32.2–2.4signal
Anaemia2,2912.32.2–2.4signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema8402.01.9–2.1raised
Opportunistic infection8211.81.7–1.9raised
Interstitial lung disease5621.71.6–1.9raised
Gi bleeding1,0291.71.6–1.8raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Ciprofloxacin Tablets as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)4,3231.6
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.759
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Pain4,2102.0
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.990
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.0NCT03354598: 1/833 (0.1%) on Ciprofloxacin Tablets (serious AE)
Nausea4,1301.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.692
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4,1301.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.918
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.0NCT03354598: 1/827 (0.1%) on Ciprofloxacin Tablets (serious AE)
Arthralgia (joint pain)4,0452.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.624
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 3.2not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,9540.9
0.9–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.229
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,4331.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.422
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3,3301.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.815
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.6 · serious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Vomiting3,1192.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.950
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Anxiety3,0053.1
3.0–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.559
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 3.3 · serious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Headache2,8501.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.546
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.3 · serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolones) ↔ Tendon rupture / tendinitis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ciprofloxacin Tablets?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ciprofloxacin Tablets are fatigue, pain, acute kidney injury, nausea, diarrhoea, arthralgia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ciprofloxacin Tablets have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS INCLUDING TENDINITIS, TENDON RUPTURE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM EFFECTS AND EXACERBATION OF MYASTHENIA GRAVIS • Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been assoc.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ciprofloxacin Tablets causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.