Etonogestrel side effects: what 47,442 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Nexplanon
Who reports
47,442 reports · 29% serious · 109 with death outcome · 100% female
Used for
NEXPLANON ® is indicated for prevention of pregnancy in women of reproductive potential for up to 5 years. NEXPLANON is a progestin indicated for prevention of pregnancy in women of reproductive potential for up to 5 years. ( 1 )
What it is
NEXPLANON is a radiopaque, progestin-only, soft, flexible implant preloaded in a sterile, disposable applicator for subdermal use. The implant is white/off-white, non-biodegradable and 4 cm in length with a diameter of 2 mm (see Figure 19 ).
Boxed warning
RISK OF COMPLICATIONS DUE TO IMPROPER INSERTION and REMOVAL Improper insertion of NEXPLANON increases the risk of complications [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Proper training prior to first use of NEXPLANON can minimize the risk of improper NEXPLANON insertion [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 990 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implant site hypoaesthesia | 158 | 3,437.6 2,159.1–5,473.2ROR 3,449.1 · calibrated p 4e-22 ✓ | 369.8 EB05 323.8 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site bruising | 516 | 1,902.8 1,558.2–2,323.6ROR 1,923.7 · calibrated p 2e-20 ✓ | 350.3 EB05 325.7 · IC025 +7.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=116 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site injury | 52 | 1,885.6 1,006.6–3,532.1ROR 1,887.7 · calibrated p 1e-17 ✓ | 313.5 EB05 248.3 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=31 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site urticaria | 64 | 1,856.6 1,058.2–3,257.4ROR 1,859.1 · calibrated p 4e-18 ✓ | 319.5 EB05 259.1 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site paraesthesia | 104 | 1,810.2 1,169.9–2,800.8ROR 1,814.2 · calibrated p 6e-19 ✓ | 330.2 EB05 280.3 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=20 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site pruritus | 625 | 1,743.4 1,463.2–2,077.2ROR 1,766.6 · calibrated p 4e-20 ✓ | 345.3 EB05 323.2 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=106 | not reported in cached trials |
| Difficulty removing drug implant | 144 | 1,740.6 1,208.2–2,507.6ROR 1,745.9 · calibrated p 4e-19 ✓ | 333.4 EB05 290.2 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=29 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site papules | 14 | 1,523.0 501.3–4,626.8ROR 1,523.4 · calibrated p 9e-13 ✓ | 232.1 EB05 146.9 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Migration of implanted drug | 408 | 1,491.9 1,216.6–1,829.5ROR 1,504.8 · calibrated p 4e-19 ✓ | 332.4 EB05 306.2 · IC025 +7.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=100 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site irritation | 268 | 1,457.7 1,135.8–1,870.9ROR 1,466.0 · calibrated p 8e-19 ✓ | 328.0 EB05 296.3 · IC025 +7.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=45 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site pustules | 39 | 1,414.2 740.5–2,700.7ROR 1,415.4 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓ | 286.6 EB05 218.8 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=17 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site discolouration | 94 | 1,239.5 833.8–1,842.6ROR 1,241.9 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 302.9 EB05 254.9 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 | not reported in cached trials |
| Pregnancy with implant contraceptive | 3,339 | 1,155.0 1,083.1–1,231.5ROR 1,242.3 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓ | 316.2 EB05 307.3 · IC025 +8.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 41.1 (33.2–50.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=3,218 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site rash | 229 | 1,071.5 842.1–1,363.3ROR 1,076.7 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 302.3 EB05 270.9 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=24 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site erythema | 649 | 984.0 856.6–1,130.3ROR 997.6 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 299.7 EB05 280.9 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=155 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site fibrosis | 290 | 978.2 795.1–1,203.5ROR 984.2 · calibrated p 6e-17 ✓ | 296.0 EB05 268.5 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=94 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site vesicles | 94 | 973.9 677.0–1,401.0ROR 975.8 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓ | 284.0 EB05 239.0 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device embolisation | 195 | 922.3 719.9–1,181.6ROR 926.1 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓ | 288.0 EB05 255.6 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=195 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site pain | 2,590 | 922.3 862.1–986.6ROR 975.5 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 295.7 EB05 286.2 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=632 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site scar | 395 | 774.2 657.0–912.4ROR 780.7 · calibrated p 7e-16 ✓ | 275.5 EB05 253.4 · IC025 +7.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=195 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site induration | 63 | 761.5 505.7–1,146.7ROR 762.5 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓ | 256.0 EB05 207.2 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=22 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site cellulitis | 134 | 757.3 572.2–1,002.1ROR 759.4 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓ | 266.5 EB05 230.7 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=63 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site nerve injury | 20 | 725.2 354.6–1,483.5ROR 725.5 · calibrated p 7e-13 ✓ | 216.4 EB05 148.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site hypersensitivity | 59 | 693.9 460.1–1,046.5ROR 694.7 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓ | 246.7 EB05 198.2 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=11 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device kink | 1,997 | 676.8 631.3–725.5ROR 706.5 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓ | 264.8 EB05 255.2 · IC025 +7.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=216 | not reported in cached trials |
| Contraceptive implant | 18 | 652.7 314.4–1,355.0ROR 653.0 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓ | 205.0 EB05 137.2 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site mass | 102 | 591.8 439.3–797.2ROR 593.1 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓ | 240.1 EB05 203.4 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=14 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site swelling | 512 | 513.3 451.9–583.2ROR 518.9 · calibrated p 5e-14 ✓ | 234.0 EB05 217.5 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=123 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site warmth | 74 | 503.1 360.1–703.0ROR 503.9 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓ | 220.6 EB05 181.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | not reported in cached trials |
| General anaesthesia | 238 | 497.9 413.5–599.6ROR 500.4 · calibrated p 9e-14 ✓ | 228.5 EB05 205.1 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=232 | not reported in cached trials |
| False negative pregnancy test | 15 | 466.2 225.1–965.8ROR 466.4 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓ | 175.6 EB05 112.9 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site nodule | 15 | 466.2 225.1–965.8ROR 466.4 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓ | 175.6 EB05 112.9 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site haemorrhage | 179 | 403.6 329.4–494.5ROR 405.1 · calibrated p 8e-13 ✓ | 205.3 EB05 181.3 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=52 | not reported in cached trials |
| Menstruation normal | 149 | 390.6 313.1–487.2ROR 391.8 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓ | 201.0 EB05 175.3 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=34 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site abscess | 85 | 381.3 285.0–510.1ROR 382.0 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓ | 194.8 EB05 162.5 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=44 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site cyst | 12 | 373.0 172.5–806.4ROR 373.1 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓ | 152.9 EB05 93.2 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site oedema | 43 | 366.9 244.5–550.4ROR 367.2 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓ | 183.4 EB05 141.8 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=22 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site inflammation | 113 | 298.0 234.6–378.5ROR 298.7 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 172.2 EB05 147.1 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=52 | not reported in cached trials |
| Complication associated with device | 5,304 | 298.0 288.1–308.2ROR 335.4 · calibrated p 3e-12 ✓ | 177.2 EB05 173.2 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 14.4 (13.0–15.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 254.6 | not reported in cached trials |
| Medical device site discomfort | 255 | 278.8 238.3–326.2ROR 280.3 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 168.2 EB05 151.6 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 4.2 (3.2–5.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=74 | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Etonogestrel as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT02616146 — Efficacy and Safety of Etonogestrel + 17β-Estradiol Vaginal Ring and Levonorgestrel-Ethinyl Estradiol Combined (N=2016, PHASE3; 13 AE terms posted; arms: ENG-E2 125 μg/300 μg; LNG-EE 150 μg/30 μg)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No adverse event | 9,911 | 26.1 25.6–26.6ROR 32.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 24.7 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 11.4 (10.6–12.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 56.5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Product quality issue | 5,555 | 19.0 18.5–19.4ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 18.2 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 16.6 (14.9–18.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Complication associated with device | 5,304 | 298.0 288.1–308.2ROR 335.4 · calibrated p 3e-12 ✓ | 177.2 EB05 173.2 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 14.4 (13.0–15.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 254.6 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device difficult to use | 4,563 | 32.7 31.8–33.7ROR 36.1 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓ | 30.5 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 35.7 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device breakage | 4,517 | 57.4 55.7–59.1ROR 63.3 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 50.8 EB05 49.6 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 28.0 | not reported in cached trials |
| Incorrect product administration duration | 3,678 | 97.9 94.6–101.3ROR 106.0 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 80.1 EB05 77.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 169.2 (112.3–254.9) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1,026 | not reported in cached trials |
| Unintended pregnancy | 3,645 | 237.4 228.3–247.0ROR 257.1 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓ | 153.8 EB05 149.7 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 51.4 (40.9–64.6) | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 323.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device deployment issue | 3,377 | 173.5 166.9–180.4ROR 186.7 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓ | 124.2 EB05 120.8 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 3.5 (3.3–3.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=733 | NCT02616146: 1/1,504 (0.1%) on Etonogestrel (serious AE) |
| Pregnancy with implant contraceptive | 3,339 | 1,155.0 1,083.1–1,231.5ROR 1,242.3 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓ | 316.2 EB05 307.3 · IC025 +8.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 41.1 (33.2–50.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=3,218 | not reported in cached trials |
| Complication of device removal | 3,308 | 107.2 103.3–111.2ROR 115.1 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 86.1 EB05 83.7 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 1.3 (1.2–1.4) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 86.5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Complication of device insertion | 3,253 | 94.1 90.7–97.6ROR 100.9 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 77.5 EB05 75.3 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 0.6 (0.6–0.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=246 | not reported in cached trials |
| Device dislocation | 2,680 | 29.0 28.0–30.2ROR 30.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 27.3 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 0.1 (0.1–0.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 58.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Implant site pain | 2,590 | 922.3 862.1–986.6ROR 975.5 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 295.7 EB05 286.2 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=632 | not reported in cached trials |
| Menorrhagia (heavy periods) | 2,443 | 61.7 59.2–64.3ROR 65.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 54.2 EB05 52.4 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 0.5 (0.5–0.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Vaginal haemorrhage | 2,319 | 25.4 24.4–26.5ROR 26.7 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 24.1 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Progestins: PRR 0.2 (0.2–0.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 44.1 | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Implant site hypoaesthesia — n=158, PRR 3,437.6
- Migration of implanted drug — n=408, PRR 1,491.9
- Implant site pustules — n=39, PRR 1,414.2
- Implant site discolouration — n=94, PRR 1,239.5
- Implant site vesicles — n=94, PRR 973.9
- Implant site induration — n=63, PRR 761.5
- Implant site cellulitis — n=134, PRR 757.3
- Implant site mass — n=102, PRR 591.8
- Implant site warmth — n=74, PRR 503.1
- General anaesthesia — n=238, PRR 497.9
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Etonogestrel?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Etonogestrel are complication associated with device, unintended pregnancy, pregnancy with implant contraceptive, complication of device removal, complication of device insertion, implant site pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Etonogestrel have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF COMPLICATIONS DUE TO IMPROPER INSERTION and REMOVAL Improper insertion of NEXPLANON increases the risk of complications [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Proper training prior to first use of NEXPLANON can minimize the risk of improper NEXPLANON insertion [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .
Do FAERS signals prove that Etonogestrel causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 487f8a62-e142-457c-97cc-2e398fde7594, effective 20260528; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"ETONOGESTREL") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,030 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
ETONOGESTREL, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.