← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% side effects: what 75,822 FDA adverse event reports show

Fluorouracil Cream, 0.5% · 1,291 reaction terms · 227,597 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nucleoside Metabolic Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Fluorouracil Cream, 0.5% (Fluorouracil)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

75,822 reports · 95% serious · 10,784 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Fluorouracil cream, 0.5% is indicated for the topical treatment of multiple actinic or solar keratoses of the face and anterior scalp.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Fluorouracil cream, 0.5%, contains fluorouracil for topical dermatologic use.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 2Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 34
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,251 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas108179.1
140.5–228.3ROR 179.3 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
106.4 EB05 90.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=108not reported in cached trials
Colorectal cancer metastatic56189.9
81.7–98.9ROR 90.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
67.7 EB05 63.1 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=557 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Portal venous gas8182.5
64.3–105.8ROR 82.6 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
62.6 EB05 52.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=81 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Oesophageal fistula7078.0
59.8–101.7ROR 78.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
59.9 EB05 49.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension7774.2
57.7–95.5ROR 74.3 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
57.7 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · ♀ 76% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mucosal toxicity5569.9
52.0–94.0ROR 69.9 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
54.8 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tumour perforation5559.3
44.3–79.4ROR 59.4 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
48.1 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rectal cancer metastatic5046.6
34.5–62.8ROR 46.6 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
39.3 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Arteriospasm coronary54944.6
40.8–48.8ROR 44.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
38.4 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=548 · 99% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Gastrointestinal anastomotic leak5242.1
31.4–56.3ROR 42.1 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
36.1 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anastomotic complication4338.6
28.0–53.1ROR 38.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.5 EB05 25.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=43 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Acute promyelocytic leukaemia12538.5
31.9–46.4ROR 38.6 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
33.7 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=108 · ♀ 83% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Anastomotic leak8437.9
30.1–47.6ROR 37.9 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
33.1 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=81 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Xeroderma3237.0
25.6–53.6ROR 37.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.1 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dermatitis acneiform68835.4
32.7–38.3ROR 35.7 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.4 EB05 29.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=653 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Focal nodular hyperplasia5834.1
26.0–44.8ROR 34.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.2 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hepatectomy3333.5
23.3–48.1ROR 33.5 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.5 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33not reported in cached trials
Bacterial translocation3433.1
23.2–47.3ROR 33.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.2 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia7532.5
25.6–41.3ROR 32.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.0 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rectal perforation5531.3
23.7–41.4ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.9 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54not reported in cached trials
Metastases to ovary3231.0
21.5–44.6ROR 31.0 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.5 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy16128.6
24.3–33.7ROR 28.7 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
25.9 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=161 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cholinergic syndrome6028.4
21.8–37.1ROR 28.4 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
25.6 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rectal adenocarcinoma5528.0
21.2–36.9ROR 28.0 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.2 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Gastrointestinal toxicity42027.0
24.4–29.9ROR 27.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
24.6 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=417 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Device related thrombosis8626.5
21.2–33.1ROR 26.5 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.1 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=85 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Toxic leukoencephalopathy6024.9
19.1–32.4ROR 24.9 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.7 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Paronychia35724.8
22.3–27.6ROR 24.9 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
22.8 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=350 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adenocarcinoma of colon15424.7
20.9–29.1ROR 24.7 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.7 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=154 · 97% clinicianNCT00847912: 3/464 (0.6%) control (serious AE)
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 increased4224.3
17.7–33.3ROR 24.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.2 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=39 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Steatohepatitis4324.0
17.5–32.7ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.9 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Colon cancer metastatic12723.7
19.8–28.4ROR 23.7 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
21.8 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=126not reported in cached trials
Neutropenic colitis16023.2
19.8–27.3ROR 23.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.4 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=160 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ileal perforation5122.9
17.2–30.4ROR 22.9 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.0 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Radiation skin injury8722.3
18.0–27.8ROR 22.4 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.6 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 66% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Myocardial injury7321.9
17.2–27.7ROR 21.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.2 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intravascular haemolysis4021.3
15.5–29.4ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.7 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Interleukin level increased3821.1
15.2–29.4ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.5 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6,9233.0
2.9–3.1ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.565
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1 · 92% clinicianNCT00847912: 1/468 (0.2%) on Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5%; 2/464 (0.4%) control (serious AE)
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))5,17010.9
10.6–11.2ROR 11.7 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
10.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.5 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nausea4,9391.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.822
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0 · 91% clinicianNCT00847912: 1/468 (0.2%) on Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% (serious AE)
Vomiting3,9622.3
2.3–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.847
2.3 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 92% clinicianNCT00847912: 1/468 (0.2%) on Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,5351.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.395
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials
Neuropathy peripheral (nerve damage in hands/feet)3,36410.2
9.8–10.5ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
9.8 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disease progression3,2397.8
7.5–8.1ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.064
7.6 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.2 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)3,1551.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.392
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2NCT00847912: 3/468 (0.6%) on Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5%
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)2,9557.5
7.2–7.8ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.073
7.3 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)2,5441.9
1.8–2.0ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.892
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6NCT00847912: 1/464 (0.2%) control (serious AE)
Anaemia (low red blood cells)2,5353.7
3.6–3.9ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.416
3.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4 · 93% clinicianNCT00847912: 2/468 (0.4%) on Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5%; 1/464 (0.2%) control (serious AE)
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,1990.5
0.4–0.5ROR 0.4 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
0.5 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -1.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Malignant neoplasm progression2,1626.0
5.7–6.2ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.142
5.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Fluorouracil ↔ Neutropenia.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5%?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% are diarrhoea, neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy peripheral, fatigue. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Fluorouracil Cream and 0.5% causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.