← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Gentamicin side effects: what 13,004 FDA adverse event reports show

Gentamicin · 1,119 reaction terms · 50,450 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

13,004 reports · 94% serious · 2,405 with death outcome · 48% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of gentamicin injection and other antibacterial drugs, gentamicin injection should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Gentamicin sulfate, a water-soluble antibiotic of the aminoglycoside group, is derived by the growth of Micromonospora purpurea , an actinomycete. It has the following structural formula. Structural Formula Gentamicin Injection, USP is a sterile, nonpyrogenic aqueous solution for parenteral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Patients treated with aminoglycosides should be under close clinical observation because of the potential toxicity associated with their use. As with other aminoglycosides, gentamicin injection is potentially nephrotoxic. The risk of nephrotoxicity is greater in patients with impaired renal function and in those who receive high dosage of prolonged therapy.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 11Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,079 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Normal labour963,550.6
2,479.0–5,085.4ROR 3,577.0 · χ² 104,291 / p <1e-300
900.2 EB05 758.9 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=96 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neonatal candida infection12615.6
316.2–1,198.5ROR 616.2 · χ² 4,875 / p <1e-300
260.3 EB05 158.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12not reported in cached trials
Bartter's syndrome10568.0
276.0–1,169.1ROR 568.4 · χ² 3,763 / p <1e-300
233.0 EB05 135.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation14454.4
250.9–822.8ROR 454.9 · χ² 4,580 / p <1e-300
238.7 EB05 151.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Endocarditis candida13338.9
186.3–616.6ROR 339.3 · χ² 3,337 / p <1e-300
198.5 EB05 123.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=13not reported in cached trials
Polyglandular disorder11312.4
163.7–596.1ROR 312.7 · χ² 2,599 / p <1e-300
180.2 EB05 107.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Delivery103297.3
241.1–366.7ROR 299.7 · χ² 25,377 / p <1e-300
239.5 EB05 203.1 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=103 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Delusion of grandeur61254.6
194.4–333.5ROR 255.8 · χ² 13,066 / p <1e-300
205.5 EB05 165.8 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)not reported in cached trials
Persistent genital arousal disorder21159.8
102.1–250.2ROR 160.1 · χ² 2,869 / p <1e-300
128.6 EB05 88.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aminoaciduria14154.6
89.3–267.6ROR 154.8 · χ² 1,810 / p <1e-300
118.6 EB05 75.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Oropharyngeal oedema12145.7
80.7–263.0ROR 145.8 · χ² 1,450 / p <1e-300
110.6 EB05 67.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Spinal muscular atrophy21136.3
87.3–212.8ROR 136.5 · χ² 2,475 / p <1e-300
113.0 EB05 78.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antimicrobial susceptibility test resistant21116.4
74.7–181.2ROR 116.6 · χ² 2,132 / p <1e-300
99.0 EB05 68.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=21not reported in cached trials
Oscillopsia16105.6
63.7–175.1ROR 105.7 · χ² 1,458 / p <1e-300
88.9 EB05 58.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Intraventricular haemorrhage neonatal30105.6
73.0–152.7ROR 105.8 · χ² 2,816 / p <1e-300
93.3 EB05 68.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=30 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antibiotic level above therapeutic24102.9
68.1–155.4ROR 103.1 · χ² 2,180 / p <1e-300
90.0 EB05 63.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=24 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anaemia folate deficiency11100.5
54.7–184.9ROR 100.6 · χ² 928 / p 4e-204
81.7 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Procedural hypertension1199.4
54.1–182.7ROR 99.5 · χ² 918 / p 6e-202
80.9 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11NCT00600483: 1/743 (0.1%) on Gentamicin; 3/759 (0.4%) control
Geotrichum infection1296.4
53.8–172.6ROR 96.5 · χ² 980 / p 2e-215
79.8 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Positive airway pressure therapy1394.8
54.2–165.9ROR 94.9 · χ² 1,052 / p 4e-231
79.5 EB05 49.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Ototoxicity9486.1
70.0–105.9ROR 86.7 · χ² 7,422 / p <1e-300
80.5 EB05 67.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=91not reported in cached trials
Cardiac valve vegetation2484.6
56.2–127.6ROR 84.8 · χ² 1,805 / p <1e-300
75.7 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Lymphocyte count abnormal4973.1
54.9–97.3ROR 73.4 · χ² 3,263 / p <1e-300
68.2 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=49 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 92% clinicianNCT00600483: 12/743 (1.6%) on Gentamicin; 7/759 (0.9%) control
Stoma closure1372.5
41.6–126.4ROR 72.6 · χ² 810 / p 2e-178
63.3 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Necrotising enterocolitis neonatal1771.1
43.8–115.6ROR 71.2 · χ² 1,059 / p 1e-232
63.5 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=17not reported in cached trials
Noninfectious peritonitis1069.1
36.7–130.2ROR 69.2 · χ² 580 / p 2e-128
59.2 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10not reported in cached trials
Respiratory tract infection bacterial2067.1
42.9–104.9ROR 67.2 · χ² 1,187 / p 2e-260
60.9 EB05 41.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=20not reported in cached trials
Herpes zoster reactivation1064.9
34.5–122.1ROR 65.0 · χ² 545 / p 9e-121
56.1 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Pneumococcal sepsis2461.7
41.0–92.7ROR 61.8 · χ² 1,321 / p 2e-289
56.9 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder3960.6
44.1–83.4ROR 60.8 · χ² 2,146 / p <1e-300
56.9 EB05 43.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39not reported in cached trials
Bacillus infection2258.8
38.4–90.0ROR 58.9 · χ² 1,150 / p 2e-252
54.2 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Endocarditis bacterial2757.1
38.9–83.8ROR 57.2 · χ² 1,383 / p <1e-300
53.2 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fungal endocarditis1056.8
30.2–106.7ROR 56.8 · χ² 477 / p 5e-106
50.0 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10not reported in cached trials
Hypoprothrombinaemia1055.0
29.3–103.3ROR 55.1 · χ² 462 / p 1e-102
48.6 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Motor neurone disease1654.3
33.0–89.3ROR 54.3 · χ² 758 / p 3e-167
49.6 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Sepsis syndrome1652.7
32.0–86.7ROR 52.7 · χ² 736 / p 2e-162
48.3 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=16NCT00600483: 5/743 (0.7%) on Gentamicin; 8/759 (1.1%) control (serious AE)
Pyroglutamic acidosis1252.6
29.6–93.4ROR 52.6 · χ² 539 / p 2e-119
47.4 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Anisocytosis2051.2
32.8–79.9ROR 51.3 · χ² 906 / p 2e-199
47.6 EB05 32.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Cns ventriculitis1050.8
27.1–95.3ROR 50.8 · χ² 426 / p 6e-95
45.3 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Gentamicin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (3 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,0641.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)7051.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 54 / p 1e-13
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4751.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 15 / p 6e-5
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2NCT00600483: 1/759 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Sepsis (blood infection)4376.3
5.8–6.9ROR 6.5 · χ² 1,961 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.9 · 91% clinicianNCT00600483: 5/743 (0.7%) on Gentamicin; 8/759 (1.1%) control (serious AE)
Condition aggravated4242.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 303 / p 4e-68
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypotension (low blood pressure)4133.3
3.0–3.7ROR 3.4 · χ² 676 / p 2e-149
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3NCT00600483: 1/743 (0.1%) on Gentamicin; 1/759 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Chronic kidney disease4038.5
7.7–9.4ROR 8.8 · χ² 2,662 / p <1e-300
8.4 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3not reported in cached trials
Nausea3880.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 22 / p 2e-6
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9NCT00600483: 1/743 (0.1%) on Gentamicin (serious AE)
Drug interaction3833.9
3.5–4.3ROR 4.0 · χ² 827 / p 3e-182
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Foetal exposure during pregnancy3597.2
6.5–7.9ROR 7.3 · χ² 1,893 / p <1e-300
7.1 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.4 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Renal failure acute35913.6
12.2–15.0ROR 13.9 · χ² 4,136 / p <1e-300
13.4 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1NCT00600483: 1/743 (0.1%) on Gentamicin (serious AE)
Pneumonia (lung infection)3451.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 105 / p 5e-25
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 1.1 · 90% clinicianNCT00600483: 1/759 (0.1%) control (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Gentamicin (aminoglycosides) ↔ Ototoxicity (hearing/balance).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Gentamicin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Gentamicin are acute kidney injury, pyrexia, renal failure, diarrhoea, sepsis, hypotension. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Gentamicin have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Patients treated with aminoglycosides should be under close clinical observation because of the potential toxicity associated with their use. As with other aminoglycosides, gentamicin injection is potentially nephrotoxic. The risk of nephrotoxicity is greater in patients with impaired renal function and in those who receive high dosage of prolonged therapy.

Do FAERS signals prove that Gentamicin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.