← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Haloperidol Lactate side effects: what 24,613 FDA adverse event reports show

Haloperidol Lactate · 1,184 reaction terms · 101,621 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

24,613 reports · 93% serious · 4,091 with death outcome · 44% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Haloperidol injection is indicated for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Haloperidol is the first of the butyrophenone series of major antipsychotics. The chemical designation is 4-[4-(p-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidino]-4'-fluorobutyrophenone and it has the following structural formula: Haloperidol, USP is a white or slightly yellowish crystalline powder.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 7Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,144 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Myocardial reperfusion injury16746.5
380.7–1,463.7ROR 747.0 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
268.7 EB05 175.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Paroxysmal perceptual alteration27687.1
413.2–1,142.5ROR 687.9 · calibrated p 7e-14 ✓
298.4 EB05 215.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Encephalitis toxic19261.6
156.3–437.7ROR 261.8 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
166.6 EB05 112.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Antipsychotic drug level below therapeutic158251.3
210.5–300.0ROR 252.9 · calibrated p 6e-11 ✓
189.2 EB05 165.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=158 · ♀ 7% (drug 44%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Malignant catatonia57241.8
180.1–324.5ROR 242.3 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
176.9 EB05 141.6 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Delusion of grandeur80185.6
145.7–236.4ROR 186.2 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
146.9 EB05 121.8 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=80 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Refusal of examination21161.8
101.4–258.1ROR 161.9 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
121.1 EB05 83.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Spasmodic dysphonia46157.7
115.1–216.0ROR 158.0 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
126.1 EB05 98.3 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome1,661138.5
131.6–145.6ROR 148.4 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
118.8 EB05 114.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 73.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Waxy flexibility23127.9
82.5–198.3ROR 128.0 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
102.0 EB05 71.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cogwheel rigidity10594.3
77.1–115.3ROR 94.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
83.6 EB05 71.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=100 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Disinhibition15389.4
75.7–105.5ROR 89.9 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
80.1 EB05 70.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=151 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%)no trial data cached
Catatonia44880.0
72.7–88.1ROR 81.5 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
73.0 EB05 67.5 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=437 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Echolalia2572.1
48.0–108.5ROR 72.2 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
63.4 EB05 45.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 67% (drug 44%)no trial data cached
Colonic pseudo-obstruction2064.8
41.2–102.2ROR 64.9 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
57.2 EB05 39.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Oscillopsia1863.2
39.2–102.1ROR 63.3 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
55.6 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Oromandibular dystonia4962.1
46.4–82.9ROR 62.2 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
56.7 EB05 44.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Neglect of personal appearance1659.7
36.0–99.1ROR 59.8 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
52.5 EB05 34.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Breathing-related sleep disorder1556.7
33.6–95.7ROR 56.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
50.0 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Grandiosity2152.2
33.6–81.1ROR 52.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
47.2 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Visceral congestion2851.1
34.9–74.8ROR 51.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.8 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Resting tremor3650.0
35.7–69.9ROR 50.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.1 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 21% (drug 44%)no trial data cached
Schizophrenia, paranoid type2049.4
31.5–77.5ROR 49.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
44.9 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=20no trial data cached
Protrusion tongue3148.2
33.6–69.2ROR 48.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
44.5 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28no trial data cached
Drug-genetic interaction1746.5
28.5–75.8ROR 46.5 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
42.2 EB05 27.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Oculogyric crisis10846.0
37.9–55.9ROR 46.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.4 EB05 36.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=104no trial data cached
Water intoxication2645.7
30.8–67.8ROR 45.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
42.1 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26no trial data cached
Extrapyramidal disorder1,25544.8
42.4–47.4ROR 47.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
42.6 EB05 40.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 28.0 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Sexually inappropriate behaviour2242.8
27.9–65.6ROR 42.8 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
39.5 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Schizoaffective disorder8542.4
34.1–52.7ROR 42.5 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
40.0 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=82no trial data cached
Emotional poverty8241.8
33.5–52.1ROR 41.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
39.5 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=81 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%)no trial data cached
Lymphocyte count abnormal5241.1
31.1–54.3ROR 41.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
38.7 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=52 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Akathisia (inner restlessness)62540.9
37.7–44.2ROR 41.9 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
39.0 EB05 36.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 32.8no trial data cached
Mutism6640.8
31.8–52.2ROR 40.9 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
38.5 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Parkinsonian gait2840.1
27.5–58.6ROR 40.2 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
37.5 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28no trial data cached
Blunted affect3138.1
26.6–54.5ROR 38.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
35.7 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31no trial data cached
Schizophrenia51637.7
34.6–41.2ROR 38.5 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
36.1 EB05 33.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 22.9no trial data cached
Parkinsonism41037.4
33.9–41.2ROR 38.0 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
35.8 EB05 33.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 24.5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,1641.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.602
1.4 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Drug interaction1,7139.3
8.9–9.7ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
9.2 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome1,661138.5
131.6–145.6ROR 148.4 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
118.8 EB05 114.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 73.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,4261.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.592
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Extrapyramidal disorder1,25544.8
42.4–47.4ROR 47.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
42.6 EB05 40.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 28.0 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Weight increased (weight gain)1,2284.7
4.5–5.0ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.244
4.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents1,1135.7
5.4–6.0ROR 5.9 · calibrated p 0.157
5.6 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Agitation88910.4
9.7–11.1ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)8423.6
3.3–3.8ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.445
3.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)8242.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.980
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Condition aggravated8212.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.872
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Delirium78819.9
18.5–21.3ROR 20.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.4 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.1 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Confusional state (confusion)7644.0
3.8–4.3ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.354
4.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Vomiting7361.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.541
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Death7340.7
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.140
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 0.4no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Haloperidol ↔ QT prolongation / torsades.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Haloperidol Lactate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Haloperidol Lactate are neuroleptic malignant syndrome, extrapyramidal disorder, weight increased, toxicity to various agents, agitation, somnolence. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Haloperidol Lactate have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

Do FAERS signals prove that Haloperidol Lactate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.