← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ipratropium side effects: what 35,447 FDA adverse event reports show

Ipratropium Bromide · 1,221 reaction terms · 203,893 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Anticholinergic

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Ipratropium Bromide (Atrovent Hfa)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

35,447 reports · 76% serious · 4,692 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ATROVENT HFA Inhalation Aerosol is indicated as a bronchodilator for maintenance treatment of bronchospasm associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. ATROVENT HFA is an anticholinergic indicated for the maintenance treatment of bronchospasm associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and emphysema ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

The active ingredient in ATROVENT HFA is ipratropium bromide (monohydrate). It is an anticholinergic bronchodilator chemically described as 8-azoniabicyclo[3.2.1]octane, 3-(3-hydroxy-1-oxo-2-p.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 9Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,181 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Heart sounds711,654.1
1,048.7–2,609.0ROR 1,657.4 · calibrated p 3e-18 ✓
386.4 EB05 316.7 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=71 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Appendicolith2731,558.9
1,242.0–1,956.5ROR 1,571.0 · calibrated p 3e-19 ✓
412.4 EB05 373.0 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=273 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy821,290.8
875.7–1,902.7ROR 1,293.8 · calibrated p 2e-17 ✓
367.5 EB05 305.4 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=82 · ♀ 22% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide increased1121,105.6
806.8–1,515.2ROR 1,109.1 · calibrated p 4e-17 ✓
358.7 EB05 306.3 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=112 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy1181,041.3
770.6–1,407.2ROR 1,044.8 · calibrated p 7e-17 ✓
352.7 EB05 302.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=118 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Total lung capacity increased168959.3
750.2–1,226.6ROR 963.9 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
348.6 EB05 306.5 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=168 · ♀ 92% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome277680.7
572.5–809.4ROR 686.1 · calibrated p 3e-15 ✓
307.7 EB05 278.5 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=277not reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy132449.6
358.3–564.1ROR 451.3 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
245.2 EB05 212.0 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=132 · ♀ 13% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug therapy125381.2
304.3–477.5ROR 382.5 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
222.9 EB05 192.0 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=125 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchial neoplasm50342.6
241.6–485.8ROR 343.1 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
199.7 EB05 157.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy82248.7
192.1–322.1ROR 249.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
167.8 EB05 139.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=82 · ♀ 22% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Prolonged expiration74230.5
176.1–301.6ROR 231.0 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
158.7 EB05 130.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage 045195.6
139.6–274.1ROR 195.8 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
138.2 EB05 107.5 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Congenital hiatus hernia46154.9
111.9–214.3ROR 155.1 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
116.7 EB05 91.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic167131.8
111.5–155.9ROR 132.4 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
106.4 EB05 93.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=167not reported in cached trials
Bronchial haemorrhage51114.2
84.6–154.2ROR 114.4 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
92.5 EB05 73.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=51 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Respiratory gas exchange disorder60114.2
86.6–150.6ROR 114.4 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
92.9 EB05 74.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Rib deformity41112.6
80.6–157.3ROR 112.8 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
90.7 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy57105.7
79.7–140.2ROR 105.9 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
87.1 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Ventricular failure46100.7
73.7–137.7ROR 100.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
83.1 EB05 64.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Bacteroides infection3798.4
69.5–139.4ROR 98.5 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
80.9 EB05 61.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Reversible airways obstruction7397.7
76.3–125.2ROR 97.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
82.1 EB05 67.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=73not reported in cached trials
Endometrial ablation5097.1
72.0–130.9ROR 97.2 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
80.9 EB05 63.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Chronic obstructive airways disease exacerbated4382.7
60.1–113.7ROR 82.8 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
70.3 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=42 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Obstructive airways disorder1,34881.2
76.8–85.9ROR 84.4 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
71.3 EB05 68.2 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 55.8NCT00400153: 1/486 (0.2%) on Ipratropium (serious AE)
Total lung capacity decreased16467.4
57.4–79.2ROR 67.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.1 EB05 52.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=161not reported in cached trials
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome13764.3
53.9–76.7ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
57.6 EB05 49.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=136 · ♀ 29% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Breast conserving surgery4759.8
44.3–80.7ROR 59.8 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
53.2 EB05 41.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Venous pressure jugular increased3256.3
39.2–80.9ROR 56.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
50.0 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Status asthmaticus4155.4
40.2–76.3ROR 55.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
49.6 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hyperphosphataemia18155.2
47.4–64.2ROR 55.4 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
50.2 EB05 44.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=181 · ♀ 16% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rhonchi11754.5
45.1–65.8ROR 54.6 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
49.5 EB05 42.4 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=116not reported in cached trials
Eosinophil count abnormal6253.6
41.3–69.5ROR 53.7 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
48.5 EB05 39.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=61not reported in cached trials
Lung hyperinflation6951.3
40.1–65.6ROR 51.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.6 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67not reported in cached trials
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease5150.9
38.2–67.7ROR 50.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.1 EB05 36.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=51 · 100% clinicianNCT00400153: 1/486 (0.2%) on Ipratropium (serious AE)
Forced vital capacity decreased5150.4
37.9–67.1ROR 50.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
45.8 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50not reported in cached trials
Myoglobin blood increased11849.2
40.8–59.4ROR 49.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
45.2 EB05 38.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=118 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Vital capacity decreased3448.2
34.0–68.3ROR 48.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.6 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Restrictive pulmonary disease8848.1
38.7–59.8ROR 48.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
44.1 EB05 36.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Ipratropium as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (2 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)6,0516.4
6.2–6.5ROR 7.5 · calibrated p 0.081
6.3 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.7NCT00400153: 2/491 (0.4%) on Ipratropium (serious AE)
Asthma4,04022.1
21.4–22.7ROR 24.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
21.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.3not reported in cached trials
Cough3,0496.5
6.3–6.7ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.098
6.4 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.1not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,6891.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.457
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Wheezing2,67027.9
26.9–29.0ROR 30.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.3not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)2,2401.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.803
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Nausea1,9981.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.660
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1,85421.8
20.8–22.8ROR 22.9 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.0 EB05 20.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 17.8NCT00400153: 8/483 (1.7%) on Ipratropium (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,7471.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.440
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,6961.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.699
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,6962.3
2.2–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.879
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,6832.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.960
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2not reported in cached trials
Headache1,6271.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.683
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Dizziness1,5181.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.854
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ipratropium?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ipratropium are dyspnoea, asthma, pneumonia, cough, wheezing, fatigue. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ipratropium have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Ipratropium has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ipratropium causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.