← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Isoniazid side effects: what 16,105 FDA adverse event reports show

Isoniazid · 1,128 reaction terms · 61,806 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Antimycobacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

16,105 reports · 91% serious · 2,199 with death outcome · 50% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Isoniazid is recommended for all forms of tuberculosis in which organisms are susceptible. However, active tuberculosis must be treated with multiple concomitant anti-tuberculosis medications to prevent the emergence of drug resistance. Single-drug treatment of active tuberculosis with isoniazid, or any other medication is inadequate therapy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Isoniazid is an antibacterial available as 100 mg and 300 mg tablets for oral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Severe and sometimes fatal hepatitis associated with isoniazid therapy has been reported and may occur or may develop even after many months of treatment. The risk of developing hepatitis is age related. Approximate .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 16Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,088 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Tuberculoma of central nervous system981,515.7
1,131.9–2,029.6ROR 1,525.0 · χ² 67,332 / p <1e-300
611.9 EB05 516.8 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=98 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Serpiginous choroiditis241,283.7
729.2–2,259.9ROR 1,285.6 · χ² 14,745 / p <1e-300
424.3 EB05 300.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 26% (drug 50%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vaginal flatulence89536.4
419.0–686.6ROR 539.4 · χ² 33,168 / p <1e-300
350.1 EB05 293.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=89 · ♀ 100% (drug 50%)not reported in cached trials
Tuberculosis of eye18453.1
264.8–775.2ROR 453.6 · χ² 5,672 / p <1e-300
247.3 EB05 165.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=18NCT01404312: 1/1,504 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Interferon gamma release assay positive34338.3
231.9–493.5ROR 339.1 · χ² 8,785 / p <1e-300
233.0 EB05 174.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=34not reported in cached trials
Pyelonephritis fungal12256.7
138.2–477.1ROR 256.9 · χ² 2,339 / p <1e-300
160.1 EB05 97.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Meningitis tuberculous92254.5
203.6–318.2ROR 256.0 · χ² 19,178 / p <1e-300
203.6 EB05 171.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=92 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diaphragmatic injury12252.5
136.0–468.9ROR 252.7 · χ² 2,306 / p <1e-300
158.5 EB05 96.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Paradoxical drug reaction554231.7
211.9–253.3ROR 239.9 · χ² 107,603 / p <1e-300
195.1 EB05 181.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=547 · 99% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Demodicidosis13214.0
119.0–384.8ROR 214.1 · χ² 2,183 / p <1e-300
144.9 EB05 90.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Haemodilution13196.3
109.5–351.9ROR 196.5 · χ² 2,025 / p <1e-300
136.7 EB05 85.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Tuberculosis of genitourinary system11190.8
101.3–359.4ROR 191.0 · χ² 1,647 / p <1e-300
129.5 EB05 77.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=11not reported in cached trials
Nicotinic acid deficiency14185.3
105.8–324.4ROR 185.4 · χ² 2,084 / p <1e-300
133.1 EB05 84.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Hemianopia heteronymous10180.8
93.3–350.5ROR 180.9 · χ² 1,414 / p <1e-300
122.3 EB05 71.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Tuberculosis skin test positive10178.3
92.0–345.4ROR 178.4 · χ² 1,396 / p <1e-300
121.1 EB05 70.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
–not reported in cached trials
Pericarditis tuberculous11158.7
84.8–296.8ROR 158.8 · χ² 1,397 / p <1e-300
113.9 EB05 67.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=11not reported in cached trials
Tuberculosis gastrointestinal34156.4
109.6–223.3ROR 156.8 · χ² 4,543 / p <1e-300
129.6 EB05 97.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=34 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Splenic embolism11141.2
75.8–263.1ROR 141.3 · χ² 1,256 / p 2e-275
104.7 EB05 62.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Acid fast bacilli infection15136.6
80.2–232.5ROR 136.7 · χ² 1,704 / p <1e-300
107.1 EB05 68.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Peritoneal tuberculosis39128.0
92.2–177.9ROR 128.4 · χ² 4,355 / p <1e-300
110.4 EB05 84.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=39 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Immune reconstitution syndrome116126.7
104.8–153.3ROR 127.6 · χ² 13,056 / p <1e-300
113.3 EB05 97.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=115not reported in cached trials
Choroiditis33125.3
87.7–179.1ROR 125.6 · χ² 3,596 / p <1e-300
107.3 EB05 80.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intestinal tuberculosis15121.1
71.3–205.6ROR 121.2 · χ² 1,525 / p <1e-300
97.4 EB05 62.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=15not reported in cached trials
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis25119.7
79.5–180.4ROR 119.9 · χ² 2,585 / p <1e-300
101.3 EB05 72.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=25not reported in cached trials
Disseminated tuberculosis207115.2
100.0–132.7ROR 116.7 · χ² 21,408 / p <1e-300
104.8 EB05 93.4 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=206 · 94% clinicianNCT01404312: 2/1,504 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Lymph node tuberculosis60114.3
87.8–148.7ROR 114.7 · χ² 6,083 / p <1e-300
101.7 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=60 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disseminated bacillus calmette-guerin infection36108.5
77.2–152.4ROR 108.7 · χ² 3,437 / p <1e-300
95.2 EB05 71.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 50%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone tuberculosis28102.7
69.9–150.9ROR 102.9 · χ² 2,518 / p <1e-300
89.5 EB05 65.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=28 · ♀ 24% (drug 50%)NCT01404312: 1/1,504 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Tuberculous pleurisy34100.1
70.6–141.9ROR 100.3 · χ² 3,003 / p <1e-300
88.5 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=33 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Thalassaemia1297.5
54.2–175.3ROR 97.6 · χ² 977 / p 8e-215
79.6 EB05 48.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Mycobacterium kansasii infection1192.3
50.1–170.1ROR 92.4 · χ² 843 / p 1e-185
75.3 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary tuberculosis28292.2
81.8–103.9ROR 93.8 · χ² 23,645 / p <1e-300
85.6 EB05 77.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=281not reported in cached trials
Hepatic haematoma3190.2
62.7–129.8ROR 90.4 · χ² 2,473 / p <1e-300
80.3 EB05 59.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=31 · ♀ 100% (drug 50%)not reported in cached trials
Gingivitis ulcerative1385.1
48.6–149.2ROR 85.2 · χ² 936 / p 6e-206
71.8 EB05 44.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Congestive hepatopathy2680.8
54.4–120.1ROR 80.9 · χ² 1,854 / p <1e-300
72.2 EB05 51.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 50%)not reported in cached trials
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome28378.0
69.2–87.8ROR 79.4 · χ² 20,210 / p <1e-300
73.2 EB05 66.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=283 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Isoniazid as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (3 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,1831.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)1,1024.2
3.9–4.4ROR 4.4 · χ² 2,671 / p <1e-300
4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 3.2NCT00023452: 1/4,040 (0.0%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Drug interaction9357.7
7.2–8.2ROR 8.1 · χ² 5,464 / p <1e-300
7.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.3 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nausea9031.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 151 / p 6e-35
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.6 · ♀ 70% (drug 50%)NCT00023452: 1/3,759 (0.0%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)8601.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms74439.0
36.3–41.9ROR 40.9 · χ² 26,748 / p <1e-300
37.9 EB05 35.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 24.0 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vomiting6361.8
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 216 / p 4e-49
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.6NCT00023452: 2/3,759 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Headache6141.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5 · ♀ 77% (drug 50%)NCT01404312: 155/1,496 (10.4%) on Isoniazid
Paradoxical drug reaction554231.7
211.9–253.3ROR 239.9 · χ² 107,603 / p <1e-300
195.1 EB05 181.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=547 · 99% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tuberculosis54757.8
53.1–62.9ROR 59.8 · χ² 29,188 / p <1e-300
55.3 EB05 51.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 35.4NCT01404312: 1/1,504 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Arthralgia (joint pain)5461.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8 · ♀ 75% (drug 50%)not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated5082.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 332 / p 1e-74
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rash5071.5
1.4–1.7ROR 1.5 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.9NCT01404312: 2/1,496 (0.1%) on Isoniazid (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5061.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.301
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1NCT01404312: 101/1,496 (6.8%) on Isoniazid

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Isoniazid ↔ Drug-induced liver injury.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Isoniazid?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Isoniazid are pyrexia, nausea, drug-induced liver injury, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, vomiting, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Isoniazid have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Severe and sometimes fatal hepatitis associated with isoniazid therapy has been reported and may occur or may develop even after many months of treatment. The risk of developing hepatitis is age related. Approximate .

Do FAERS signals prove that Isoniazid causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.