← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Letrozole Tablets side effects: what 47,818 FDA adverse event reports show

Letrozole Tablets · 1,239 reaction terms · 211,251 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Aromatase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

47,818 reports · 80% serious · 4,408 with death outcome · 98% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Letrozole tablets are an aromatase inhibitor indicated for: Adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer (1.1) Extended adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who have receiv.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Letrozole Tablets USP for oral administration contain 2.5 mg of letrozole, USP, a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (inhibitor of estrogen synthesis). It is chemically described as 4,4'-(1 H -1,2,4triazol-1-ylmethylene)dibenzonitrile, and its structural formula is: C 17 H 11 N 5 M.W.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 2Lab value / disease marker 8Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,199 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Serous cystadenocarcinoma ovary26561.2
313.3–1,005.2ROR 561.5 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
207.4 EB05 148.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26not reported in cached trials
Pik3ca-activated mutation168470.9
378.5–585.9ROR 472.6 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
220.1 EB05 193.6 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.5–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=168not reported in cached trials
Carbohydrate antigen 15-3 increased255221.5
190.5–257.5ROR 222.7 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
145.1 EB05 130.8 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.6–2.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=249not reported in cached trials
Hormone receptor positive breast cancer57121.2
90.4–162.6ROR 121.4 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
92.0 EB05 73.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.2 (1.6–3.0)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=57not reported in cached trials
Amaurosis fugax230120.2
103.9–139.1ROR 120.8 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
93.5 EB05 83.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=230 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Body surface area increased25104.8
67.7–162.2ROR 104.8 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
79.5 EB05 56.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Pleural neoplasm3097.4
65.5–144.7ROR 97.4 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
75.9 EB05 55.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.0 (1.9–4.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Carbohydrate antigen 27.29 increased2587.0
56.6–133.7ROR 87.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
68.9 EB05 49.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.0–2.7)
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Breast cancer metastatic1,67981.4
77.3–85.6ROR 84.3 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
68.6 EB05 65.9 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.8 (1.7–1.9)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 49.0not reported in cached trials
Metastases to chest wall5480.9
60.5–108.2ROR 81.0 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
66.8 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.3 (1.0–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54not reported in cached trials
Metastases to abdominal wall2874.6
50.0–111.4ROR 74.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
61.2 EB05 44.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pseudocirrhosis4671.4
52.3–97.6ROR 71.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.0 EB05 46.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tumour marker abnormal4567.9
49.6–93.0ROR 68.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
57.5 EB05 44.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.2–2.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=35not reported in cached trials
Metastases to skin13365.4
54.5–78.5ROR 65.6 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
56.5 EB05 48.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.5 (1.3–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=132not reported in cached trials
Metastases to pleura13364.1
53.5–76.9ROR 64.3 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
55.6 EB05 48.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.6 (1.3–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=133not reported in cached trials
Metastases to the mediastinum5262.7
46.9–83.9ROR 62.8 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
53.9 EB05 42.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.3 (1.0–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma6260.3
46.2–78.6ROR 60.4 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
52.2 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.6 (1.2–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60not reported in cached trials
Metastases to bone1,85055.9
53.3–58.6ROR 58.1 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
49.6 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.4 (1.4–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.9not reported in cached trials
Metastases to thorax2649.9
33.2–74.9ROR 49.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.5 EB05 31.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 0.9 (0.6–1.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26not reported in cached trials
Invasive breast carcinoma4249.5
36.0–68.2ROR 49.6 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.7 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.7 (1.8–4.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone marrow infiltration3847.8
34.2–66.9ROR 47.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
42.3 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.7 (1.8–4.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Metastases to pelvis6046.0
35.3–60.0ROR 46.1 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
41.2 EB05 33.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60not reported in cached trials
Neutrophil percentage decreased4742.4
31.5–57.3ROR 42.5 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.2 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.6 (2.4–5.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=46 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tumour marker increased41641.5
37.5–45.8ROR 41.8 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
37.8 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.4 (1.2–1.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=344not reported in cached trials
Breast cancer recurrent26940.9
36.1–46.3ROR 41.1 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
37.3 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 0.9 (0.8–1.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=268not reported in cached trials
Metastases to stomach3138.3
26.6–55.4ROR 38.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.6 EB05 25.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.1 (1.9–5.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31not reported in cached trials
Intestinal metastasis2837.9
25.8–55.8ROR 37.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.2 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28not reported in cached trials
Lymphocyte percentage increased3237.5
26.2–53.9ROR 37.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.0 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.5 (2.2–5.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=31 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Metastases to liver1,33436.1
34.1–38.1ROR 37.1 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
33.3 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.0not reported in cached trials
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma20535.7
30.9–41.1ROR 35.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.9 EB05 29.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.4–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=205not reported in cached trials
Breast conserving surgery3835.1
25.2–48.9ROR 35.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
32.1 EB05 24.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.6 (2.3–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Metastases to spine23733.3
29.2–38.0ROR 33.5 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.9 EB05 27.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=237not reported in cached trials
Neoplasm progression2,44232.7
31.4–34.1ROR 34.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.5 EB05 29.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.1not reported in cached trials
Metastases to bone marrow3431.7
22.4–44.9ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
29.2 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.3 (1.5–3.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33not reported in cached trials
Carcinoembryonic antigen increased13031.6
26.4–37.7ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.4 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.6–2.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=130not reported in cached trials
Metastases to lymph nodes44230.9
28.1–34.0ROR 31.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.9 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=442not reported in cached trials
Bone lesion23330.2
26.5–34.5ROR 30.4 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
28.2 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=226not reported in cached trials
Metastases to peritoneum15328.5
24.2–33.5ROR 28.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.6–2.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=153not reported in cached trials
Mean cell haemoglobin increased10028.1
22.9–34.4ROR 28.1 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.3 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.8 (1.4–2.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=89not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Letrozole Tablets as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)6,0453.4
3.4–3.5ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.420
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2NCT00553410: 48/2,417 (2.0%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))4,54715.2
14.8–15.6ROR 16.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
14.7 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.4 (2.3–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.9NCT00553410: 1/2,417 (0.0%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Nausea4,4132.5
2.4–2.5ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.768
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.6NCT00553410: 2/2,417 (0.1%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3,8502.6
2.6–2.7ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.703
2.6 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5NCT00553410: 5/2,417 (0.2%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Malignant neoplasm progression3,60116.0
15.5–16.6ROR 17.3 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
15.5 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.6 (1.6–1.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.3not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)2,9583.1
3.0–3.3ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.540
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2not reported in cached trials
Alopecia (hair loss)2,8286.4
6.2–6.6ROR 6.7 · calibrated p 0.111
6.3 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.3 (1.3–1.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.1not reported in cached trials
Neoplasm progression2,44232.7
31.4–34.1ROR 34.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.5 EB05 29.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.1not reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)2,3362.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.686
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4NCT00553410: 48/2,417 (2.0%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,3211.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.856
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.3 (1.3–1.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6NCT00553410: 5/2,417 (0.2%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Pain2,1961.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.703
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.2 (1.2–1.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4NCT00553410: 1/2,411 (0.0%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Vomiting2,1582.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.982
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8NCT00553410: 1/2,417 (0.0%) on Letrozole Tablets (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,9351.0
0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.291
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.6)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Letrozole Tablets?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Letrozole Tablets are fatigue, neutropenia, nausea, diarrhoea, white blood cell count decreased, arthralgia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Letrozole Tablets have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Letrozole Tablets has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Letrozole Tablets causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.