← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lithium side effects: what 25,059 FDA adverse event reports show

Lithium · 1,221 reaction terms · 111,487 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Mood-stabilizing agent

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

25,059 reports · 78% serious · 2,094 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Lithium oral solution is a mood-stabilizing agent indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of bipolar I disorder: Treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes in patients 7 years and older . Maintenance treatment in patients 7 years and older .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Each 5 mL of solution for oral administration contains lithium ion (Li + ), 8 mEq (equivalent to amount of lithium in 300 mg of lithium carbonate, USP), and the following other inactive ingred.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

LITHIUM TOXICITY Lithium toxicity is closely related to serum lithium concentrations, and can occur at doses close to therapeutic concentrations. Facilities for prompt and accurate serum lithium determinations should be available before initiating treatment [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.3 ), Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 3Lab value / disease marker 5Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,181 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hypokinetic dysarthria161,884.7
775.4–4,580.9ROR 1,885.9 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
340.3 EB05 222.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Paroxysmal perceptual alteration25589.0
352.6–983.9ROR 589.6 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
272.4 EB05 194.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 36% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Total lung capacity increased97462.3
360.7–592.6ROR 464.1 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
280.2 EB05 236.5 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus304301.3
264.4–343.4ROR 305.0 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
217.9 EB05 198.1 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=302 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dystonic tremor17203.2
119.5–345.3ROR 203.3 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
138.2 EB05 91.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome97191.8
153.8–239.1ROR 192.5 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
151.2 EB05 127.6 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Delusion of grandeur82187.8
147.8–238.6ROR 188.4 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
147.9 EB05 123.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=82 · ♀ 17% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Antipsychotic drug level below therapeutic123180.1
148.3–218.9ROR 181.0 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
144.7 EB05 124.5 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=114 · ♀ 22% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Schizoaffective disorder bipolar type27110.8
74.1–165.5ROR 110.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
91.6 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=27not reported in cached trials
Antipsychotic drug level above therapeutic104109.7
89.4–134.5ROR 110.1 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
95.3 EB05 80.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=90 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Camptocormia27106.5
71.4–159.0ROR 106.6 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
88.7 EB05 64.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rebound psychosis2191.6
58.4–143.8ROR 91.7 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
77.0 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Grandiosity3589.1
62.9–126.2ROR 89.2 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
77.2 EB05 58.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34not reported in cached trials
Postural tremor2786.3
58.1–128.3ROR 86.4 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
74.3 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypomania33483.3
74.5–93.2ROR 84.4 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
75.4 EB05 68.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=315 · ♀ 80% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Adulterated product1781.0
49.2–133.3ROR 81.1 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
68.4 EB05 45.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Oppositional defiant disorder3580.4
56.8–113.7ROR 80.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
70.6 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Schizoaffective disorder15780.3
68.2–94.5ROR 80.8 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
72.6 EB05 63.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=156not reported in cached trials
Antipsychotic drug level increased24178.3
68.6–89.3ROR 79.0 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
71.2 EB05 64.0 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=220not reported in cached trials
Oscillopsia2173.4
47.0–114.6ROR 73.4 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
63.7 EB05 44.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antipsychotic drug level decreased4169.8
50.8–96.1ROR 70.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
62.7 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pleurothotonus6261.0
47.1–78.9ROR 61.2 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
55.9 EB05 45.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism13458.2
48.8–69.3ROR 58.5 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
54.0 EB05 46.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=131 · ♀ 83% (drug 58%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bipolar ii disorder2254.5
35.4–83.9ROR 54.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
49.1 EB05 34.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=20not reported in cached trials
Soft tissue injury4552.8
39.1–71.3ROR 52.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
48.7 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Bipolar i disorder11948.1
40.0–57.8ROR 48.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
45.2 EB05 38.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=109not reported in cached trials
Post-traumatic neck syndrome4447.8
35.3–64.8ROR 47.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
44.4 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome62046.0
42.5–49.8ROR 47.1 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.6 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 32.4not reported in cached trials
Oromandibular dystonia3745.2
32.5–62.9ROR 45.3 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
42.0 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35not reported in cached trials
Echolalia1644.0
26.6–72.7ROR 44.0 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
40.0 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Diabetes insipidus12144.0
36.6–52.8ROR 44.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
41.5 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=119not reported in cached trials
Somatic symptom disorder5444.0
33.4–57.8ROR 44.0 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
41.2 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Mania78141.7
38.9–44.8ROR 43.0 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
39.7 EB05 37.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.2not reported in cached trials
Flight of ideas2541.6
27.9–62.2ROR 41.7 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
38.6 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25not reported in cached trials
Disinhibition7641.4
32.9–52.1ROR 41.5 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
39.1 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Lymphocyte count abnormal5341.2
31.2–54.2ROR 41.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
38.7 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=53 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Lithium as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,2971.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.646
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials
Toxicity to various agents2,26711.4
11.0–11.9ROR 12.5 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
11.3 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,6041.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.697
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Drug interaction1,5828.4
8.0–8.8ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.047 ✓
8.3 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4not reported in cached trials
Tremor (shaking)1,5097.7
7.3–8.0ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.065
7.6 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 7.0NCT02960763: 34/127 (26.8%) on Lithium
Nausea1,4061.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.655
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6NCT02960763: 12/127 (9.4%) on Lithium
Fatigue (tiredness)1,0821.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.422
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,0691.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.917
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8NCT02960763: 12/127 (9.4%) on Lithium
Anxiety9902.9
2.7–3.1ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.630
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Somnolence (drowsiness)9363.9
3.7–4.2ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.374
3.9 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 3.8not reported in cached trials
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)9302.9
2.7–3.1ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.627
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Suicidal ideation (thoughts of suicide)9148.4
7.9–9.0ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.051
8.3 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3not reported in cached trials
Dizziness8421.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.596
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3NCT02960763: 28/127 (22.0%) on Lithium

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Lithium ↔ Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lithium?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lithium are toxicity to various agents, tremor, nausea, weight increased, fatigue, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lithium have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: LITHIUM TOXICITY Lithium toxicity is closely related to serum lithium concentrations, and can occur at doses close to therapeutic concentrations. Facilities for prompt and accurate serum lithium determinations should be available before initiating treatment [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.3 ), Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Lithium causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.