← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor side effects: what 8,519 FDA adverse event reports show

Lumacaftor And Ivacaftor · Orkambi · 588 reaction terms · 15,850 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Potentiator

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Orkambi

openFDA label

Who reports

8,519 reports · 63% serious · 158 with death outcome · 52% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ORKAMBI is indicated for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) in patients aged 1 year and older who are homozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene. If the patient's genotype is unknown, an FDA-cleared CF mutation test should be used to detect the presence of the F508del mutation on both alleles of the CFTR gene.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

The active ingredients in ORKAMBI tablets are lumacaftor, which has the following chemical name: 3-[6-({[1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropyl]carbonyl}amino)-3-methylpyridin-2-yl]b.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 3Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 548 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis1,462898.3
849.3–950.2ROR 1,084.2 · χ² 956,101 / p <1e-300
650.4 EB05 622.8 · IC025 +9.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1,282no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis lung24554.9
356.3–864.2ROR 556.5 · χ² 10,355 / p <1e-300
332.1 EB05 234.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=23no trial data cached
Pulmonary function test decreased397244.2
220.8–270.2ROR 256.1 · χ² 87,180 / p <1e-300
219.7 EB05 202.1 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=309no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis related diabetes10182.5
96.0–347.0ROR 182.7 · χ² 1,515 / p <1e-300
128.8 EB05 74.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=9no trial data cached
Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome23178.4
116.9–272.3ROR 178.9 · χ² 3,616 / p <1e-300
146.3 EB05 102.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis327153.7
137.8–171.6ROR 159.8 · χ² 46,532 / p <1e-300
143.4 EB05 130.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=303no trial data cached
Forced expiratory volume decreased120108.7
90.6–130.4ROR 110.2 · χ² 12,155 / p <1e-300
102.4 EB05 87.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=88no trial data cached
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasis12104.8
58.8–186.7ROR 104.9 · χ² 1,085 / p 3e-238
87.0 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Respiratory symptom8274.2
59.6–92.3ROR 74.9 · χ² 5,676 / p <1e-300
70.9 EB05 58.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=77 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Respiration abnormal19170.8
61.4–81.6ROR 72.4 · χ² 12,700 / p <1e-300
68.3 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=107no trial data cached
Pseudomonas test positive2267.4
44.2–103.0ROR 67.6 · χ² 1,337 / p 5e-293
62.3 EB05 43.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=9no trial data cached
Sputum increased5059.6
45.0–78.8ROR 59.9 · χ² 2,753 / p <1e-300
57.0 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=36no trial data cached
Lung infection pseudomonal1044.3
23.7–82.8ROR 44.4 · χ² 374 / p 1e-83
40.4 EB05 23.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Lung transplant6344.3
34.5–56.7ROR 44.6 · χ² 2,574 / p <1e-300
43.0 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62no trial data cached
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic1643.7
26.7–71.6ROR 43.8 · χ² 614 / p 6e-136
41.0 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Pulmonary function test abnormal2438.4
25.7–57.4ROR 38.5 · χ² 824 / p 2e-181
36.8 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=19no trial data cached
Bronchial secretion retention1835.5
22.3–56.6ROR 35.6 · χ² 562 / p 2e-124
33.9 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Sinus operation3334.6
24.6–48.8ROR 34.8 · χ² 1,030 / p 3e-226
33.6 EB05 25.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=32no trial data cached
Pseudomonas infection10029.4
24.2–35.8ROR 29.8 · χ² 2,685 / p <1e-300
28.9 EB05 24.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.0no trial data cached
Increased bronchial secretion3029.1
20.3–41.7ROR 29.2 · χ² 777 / p 3e-171
28.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Weight gain poor2021.5
13.8–33.3ROR 21.5 · χ² 367 / p 5e-82
20.9 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Pneumonia staphylococcal1620.1
12.3–32.9ROR 20.2 · χ² 270 / p 6e-61
19.4 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Gastrostomy1219.4
11.0–34.1ROR 19.4 · χ² 189 / p 2e-43
18.3 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Drug screen false positive2118.6
12.1–28.6ROR 18.7 · χ² 330 / p 5e-74
18.1 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=3no trial data cached
Pneumonia pseudomonal1117.9
9.9–32.4ROR 18.0 · χ² 158 / p 1e-36
16.7 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Steatorrhoea1917.6
11.2–27.6ROR 17.6 · χ² 279 / p 7e-63
17.0 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Staphylococcus test positive1517.5
10.5–29.1ROR 17.5 · χ² 215 / p 4e-49
16.7 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Rhinovirus infection2415.6
10.5–23.3ROR 15.7 · χ² 312 / p 3e-70
15.1 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Hospitalisation88714.4
13.5–15.3ROR 16.0 · χ² 11,068 / p <1e-300
14.3 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Haemoptysis11710.3
8.6–12.4ROR 10.5 · χ² 975 / p 3e-214
10.1 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Bronchiectasis248.9
6.0–13.3ROR 8.9 · χ² 160 / p 6e-37
8.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial data cached
Emergency care108.3
4.5–15.4ROR 8.3 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14
6.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Chest discomfort3438.3
7.5–9.2ROR 8.6 · χ² 2,199 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Pneumothorax538.3
6.3–10.8ROR 8.3 · χ² 330 / p 5e-74
7.8 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis1,462898.3
849.3–950.2ROR 1,084.2 · χ² 956,101 / p <1e-300
650.4 EB05 622.8 · IC025 +9.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1,282no trial data cached
Hospitalisation88714.4
13.5–15.3ROR 16.0 · χ² 11,068 / p <1e-300
14.3 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5572.4
2.2–2.6ROR 2.5 · χ² 478 / p 4e-106
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Pulmonary function test decreased397244.2
220.8–270.2ROR 256.1 · χ² 87,180 / p <1e-300
219.7 EB05 202.1 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=309no trial data cached
Cough3953.5
3.2–3.8ROR 3.6 · χ² 703 / p 3e-155
3.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Infection3706.3
5.7–7.0ROR 6.6 · χ² 1,662 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Chest discomfort3438.3
7.5–9.2ROR 8.6 · χ² 2,199 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis327153.7
137.8–171.6ROR 159.8 · χ² 46,532 / p <1e-300
143.4 EB05 130.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=303no trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)2692.0
1.8–2.3ROR 2.1 · χ² 146 / p 8e-34
2.0 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)2241.3
1.1–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
1.3 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Nasopharyngitis (common cold)2022.7
2.3–3.1ROR 2.7 · χ² 215 / p 6e-49
2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)2000.6
0.6–0.7ROR 0.6 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
0.6 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.5no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1940.7
0.6–0.9ROR 0.7 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.5no trial data cached
Respiration abnormal19170.8
61.4–81.6ROR 72.4 · χ² 12,700 / p <1e-300
68.3 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=107no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)1861.3
1.1–1.5ROR 1.3 · χ² 15 / p 7e-5
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor are infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis, dyspnoea, pulmonary function test decreased, cough, infection, chest discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.