Midazolam Hydrochloride side effects: what 26,764 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Nayzilam
Who reports
26,764 reports · 93% serious · 5,139 with death outcome · 48% female
Used for
NAYZILAM is indicated for the acute treatment of intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (i.e., seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures) that are distinct from a patient's usual seizure pattern in patients with epilepsy 12 years of age and older.
What it is
NAYZILAM contains midazolam, a compound of the benzodiazepine class. Midazolam is chemically designated as 8-Chloro-6-(ο-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine, and it has the following structure:
Boxed warning
RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death . Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs for patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,162 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaginal flatulence | 175 | 1,063.9 846.8–1,336.5ROR 1,070.9 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓ | 427.0 EB05 376.5 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 247.8 (209.7–292.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=175 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Mitochondrial dna mutation | 38 | 624.2 407.1–957.1ROR 625.1 · calibrated p 7e-14 ✓ | 294.4 EB05 223.9 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 243.7 (165.5–358.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| New onset refractory status epilepticus | 40 | 475.1 320.5–704.3ROR 475.8 · calibrated p 7e-13 ✓ | 258.2 EB05 197.8 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 315.0 (211.9–468.3) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=40 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Trigemino-cardiac reflex | 27 | 386.0 243.3–612.6ROR 386.4 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓ | 218.1 EB05 157.4 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 448.9 (264.9–760.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Chest wall rigidity | 20 | 350.9 206.9–595.3ROR 351.2 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓ | 196.5 EB05 134.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 498.7 (265.1–938.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Myoglobin urine present | 62 | 258.7 194.1–344.9ROR 259.3 · calibrated p 9e-11 ✓ | 183.2 EB05 148.0 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 299.2 (219.2–408.6) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=61 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Negative pressure pulmonary oedema | 22 | 242.6 150.3–391.7ROR 242.8 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓ | 159.5 EB05 111.0 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 448.9 (249.9–806.2) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=22 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intra-abdominal pressure increased | 35 | 225.2 154.6–328.1ROR 225.5 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓ | 159.5 EB05 119.9 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 604.3 (366.0–997.5) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Propofol infusion syndrome | 156 | 222.6 186.4–265.9ROR 223.9 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓ | 169.5 EB05 148.3 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 355.5 (292.6–431.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=156 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Csf oligoclonal band present | 25 | 201.1 129.5–312.2ROR 201.2 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓ | 142.6 EB05 101.5 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 244.0 (150.9–394.5) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Burkholderia test positive | 23 | 177.6 112.9–279.4ROR 177.7 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓ | 129.3 EB05 90.7 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 516.2 (285.0–935.0) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=23 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intensive care unit acquired weakness | 61 | 149.0 113.3–196.0ROR 149.4 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓ | 120.4 EB05 97.1 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 355.6 (256.5–492.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=61 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Anal prolapse | 19 | 148.2 90.7–242.1ROR 148.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 110.9 EB05 75.0 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 448.9 (238.8–843.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial data cached |
| Airway peak pressure increased | 23 | 139.8 89.7–218.0ROR 139.9 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 108.1 EB05 75.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 573.6 (311.1–1,057.4) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=23 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Necrosis ischaemic | 60 | 116.7 89.0–153.0ROR 116.9 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓ | 98.4 EB05 79.2 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 598.5 (410.0–873.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=60 | no trial data cached |
| Unwanted awareness during anaesthesia | 39 | 105.7 75.6–147.6ROR 105.8 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 89.1 EB05 68.0 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 473.1 (303.9–736.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Myocardial depression | 28 | 103.4 69.7–153.4ROR 103.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 86.1 EB05 62.5 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 196.4 (126.9–304.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Neuromuscular block prolonged | 42 | 99.8 72.4–137.6ROR 99.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 85.2 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 523.7 (337.9–811.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Female genital tract fistula | 190 | 97.2 83.6–113.0ROR 97.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 85.7 EB05 76.0 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 241.6 (206.4–282.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=190 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Anaesthetic complication neurological | 95 | 91.1 73.7–112.7ROR 91.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 80.3 EB05 67.7 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 453.7 (344.9–596.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=94 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hepatic ischaemia | 32 | 89.5 62.1–129.1ROR 89.6 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 76.8 EB05 56.9 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 495.3 (301.6–813.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Postoperative delirium | 19 | 87.8 54.7–141.2ROR 87.9 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 73.4 EB05 49.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 501.7 (262.0–960.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple-drug resistance | 303 | 85.0 75.6–95.7ROR 86.0 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 76.3 EB05 69.4 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 84.2 (76.6–92.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=238 · 98% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hyperthermia malignant | 138 | 80.7 67.8–96.1ROR 81.1 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 72.5 EB05 62.9 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 472.9 (377.4–592.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=135 · ♀ 20% (drug 48%) · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Neuromuscular blockade | 21 | 79.5 50.7–124.5ROR 79.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 67.9 EB05 46.8 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 471.3 (256.8–865.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial data cached |
| Airway complication of anaesthesia | 23 | 76.2 49.7–116.9ROR 76.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 65.8 EB05 46.2 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 491.6 (273.5–883.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=22 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Delayed recovery from anaesthesia | 82 | 74.1 59.1–93.0ROR 74.4 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 66.7 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 557.7 (407.3–763.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=80 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Carcinoid crisis | 17 | 63.1 38.5–103.4ROR 63.1 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 55.0 EB05 36.4 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 448.9 (230.2–875.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=17 | no trial data cached |
| Pneumatosis | 33 | 62.8 44.0–89.5ROR 62.8 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 56.3 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 617.2 (367.0–1,038.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Proctitis | 204 | 61.4 53.3–70.8ROR 61.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 56.7 EB05 50.5 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 248.8 (213.8–289.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=204 · ♀ 95% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Radiculopathy | 183 | 58.4 50.3–67.8ROR 58.8 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓ | 54.1 EB05 47.8 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 177.0 (152.1–206.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=183 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity | 65 | 52.4 40.8–67.3ROR 52.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 48.5 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 463.1 (330.5–649.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=65 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Status epilepticus | 693 | 51.1 47.3–55.1ROR 52.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 47.9 EB05 45.0 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 83.2 (81.7–84.6) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 29.6 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Diabetes insipidus | 147 | 50.6 42.8–59.8ROR 50.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 47.3 EB05 41.2 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 360.6 (294.6–441.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=147 · 92% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Renal ischaemia | 32 | 49.0 34.3–70.1ROR 49.1 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 45.0 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 798.0 (450.4–1,413.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Pseudopolyp | 21 | 48.5 31.2–75.4ROR 48.6 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 44.0 EB05 30.4 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 | no trial data cached |
| Upper airway obstruction | 51 | 47.6 35.9–63.2ROR 47.7 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 44.2 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 487.1 (330.3–718.2) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=51 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Neonatal respiratory depression | 19 | 46.9 29.5–74.5ROR 46.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 42.5 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 448.9 (238.8–843.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=19 | no trial data cached |
| Po2 increased | 28 | 45.3 31.0–66.3ROR 45.4 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 41.7 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 698.2 (388.3–1,255.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Blood gases abnormal | 29 | 44.9 30.9–65.2ROR 44.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 41.4 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 241.1 (154.6–375.9) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 3,405 | 2.0 2.0–2.1ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.962 | 2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 24.7 (24.7–24.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.2 · 92% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 2,557 | 2.3 2.2–2.4ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.834 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 27.8 (27.8–27.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.4 | no trial data cached |
| Hypotension (low blood pressure) | 1,575 | 6.2 5.9–6.5ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.120 | 6.2 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 35.7 (35.7–35.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.4 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Drug interaction | 1,247 | 6.2 5.9–6.5ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.124 | 6.1 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 21.5 (21.5–21.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 4.1 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Seizure | 1,198 | 8.3 7.8–8.7ROR 8.6 · calibrated p 0.053 | 8.2 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 27.6 (27.6–27.6) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 5.2 | no trial data cached |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 960 | 2.2 2.0–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.942 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 19.4 (19.4–19.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.7 | no trial data cached |
| Toxicity to various agents | 937 | 4.4 4.1–4.7ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.295 | 4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 9.6 (9.6–9.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.8 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cardiac arrest (heart stopping) | 937 | 8.9 8.4–9.5ROR 9.2 · calibrated p 0.042 ✓ | 8.8 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 32.9 (32.9–32.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.5 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage) | 928 | 4.8 4.5–5.1ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.242 | 4.8 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 29.5 (29.5–29.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.9 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Death | 733 | 0.7 0.6–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.110 | 0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 11.3 (11.3–11.3) | Outcome field, not a reaction boxed warning mentions mortality | serious PRR 0.4 | no trial data cached |
| Respiratory failure | 704 | 7.6 7.1–8.2ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.072 | 7.5 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 47.5 (47.5–47.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Nausea | 698 | 0.7 0.6–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.123 | 0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.7 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 6.1 (6.1–6.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 0.8 · ♀ 72% (drug 48%) | no trial data cached |
| Condition aggravated | 697 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.849 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 14.9 (14.9–14.9) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.7 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Status epilepticus | 693 | 51.1 47.3–55.1ROR 52.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 47.9 EB05 45.0 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 83.2 (81.7–84.6) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 29.6 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Tachycardia (fast heart rate) | 670 | 5.9 5.5–6.4ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.146 | 5.9 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 28.0 (28.0–28.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.9 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Vaginal flatulence — n=175, PRR 1,063.9
- Mitochondrial dna mutation — n=38, PRR 624.2
- Trigemino-cardiac reflex — n=27, PRR 386.0
- Chest wall rigidity — n=20, PRR 350.9
- Propofol infusion syndrome — n=156, PRR 222.6
- Intensive care unit acquired weakness — n=61, PRR 149.0
- Necrosis ischaemic — n=60, PRR 116.7
- Unwanted awareness during anaesthesia — n=39, PRR 105.7
- Myocardial depression — n=28, PRR 103.4
- Neuromuscular block prolonged — n=42, PRR 99.8
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Oxycodone Hydrochloride ↔ Drug Dependence.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Midazolam?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Midazolam are hypotension, seizure, pyrexia, toxicity to various agents, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Midazolam have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death . Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs for patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.
Do FAERS signals prove that Midazolam causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 2b29422e-54d5-4a49-8522-e9cf752368c3, effective 20230119; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"MIDAZOLAM") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,202 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.