Oxaliplatin side effects: what 73,749 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
73,749 reports · 97% serious · 10,724 with death outcome · 41% female
Used for
Oxaliplatin injection USP, in combination with infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin, is indicated for: adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in patients who have undergone complete resection of the primary tumor. treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
What it is
Oxaliplatin is a platinum-based drug with the molecular formula C 8 H 14 N 2 O 4 Pt and the chemical name of cis -[(1 R ,2 R )-1,2-cyclohexanediamine- N , N ′] [oxalato(2-)- O , O ′] platinum..
Boxed warning
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS, INCLUDING ANAPHYLAXIS Serious and fatal hypersensitivity adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, can occur with oxaliplatin injection within minutes of administration and during any cycle.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,187 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 increased | 33 | 4,612.8 1,106.9–19,223.4ROR 4,614.9 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓ | 229.5 EB05 171.0 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=33 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Stomal varices | 50 | 698.9 416.1–1,173.8ROR 699.4 · calibrated p 6e-14 ✓ | 186.2 EB05 146.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dysaesthesia pharynx | 115 | 554.3 404.3–760.0ROR 555.2 · calibrated p 7e-14 ✓ | 180.9 EB05 154.8 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=115 · ♀ 69% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Type ii hypersensitivity | 56 | 260.9 181.3–375.5ROR 261.1 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 129.6 EB05 103.5 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=56 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas | 110 | 189.8 149.0–241.8ROR 190.1 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 111.3 EB05 94.9 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=110 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension | 144 | 187.2 151.6–231.2ROR 187.6 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 110.9 EB05 96.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=144 · ♀ 65% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Alpha tumour necrosis factor increased | 33 | 153.8 100.6–235.1ROR 153.8 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 94.3 EB05 70.2 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=33 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Tumour perforation | 91 | 117.8 92.2–150.5ROR 117.9 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓ | 81.8 EB05 68.6 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=91 · 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Colorectal cancer metastatic | 525 | 84.7 76.8–93.4ROR 85.3 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 65.1 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=523 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastrointestinal anastomotic leak | 82 | 74.9 58.7–95.6ROR 75.0 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 58.5 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=81 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency | 43 | 71.1 50.9–99.4ROR 71.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 55.6 EB05 43.0 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=43 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anastomotic leak | 123 | 61.0 50.2–74.1ROR 61.1 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓ | 49.9 EB05 42.9 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 2.9 (2.2–3.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=123 · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rectal cancer metastatic | 60 | 59.5 45.0–78.6ROR 59.5 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓ | 48.5 EB05 39.1 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=60 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Mucosal toxicity | 45 | 56.2 40.8–77.4ROR 56.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 46.1 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=45 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hepatectomy | 50 | 55.7 41.1–75.4ROR 55.7 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 45.8 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=50 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nodular regenerative hyperplasia | 114 | 54.2 44.4–66.2ROR 54.3 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 45.2 EB05 38.7 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=112 · ♀ 64% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Evans syndrome | 75 | 52.4 41.0–67.1ROR 52.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 43.8 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=75 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Focal nodular hyperplasia | 81 | 51.6 40.7–65.4ROR 51.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 43.3 EB05 35.9 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=81 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Arteriospasm coronary | 591 | 50.0 45.8–54.6ROR 50.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 42.5 EB05 39.7 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 12.8 (10.3–16.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=591 · 99% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Laryngospasm | 392 | 48.3 43.4–53.8ROR 48.6 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 41.3 EB05 38.0 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 13.8 (10.4–18.2) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=390 · ♀ 75% (drug 41%) · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Skin toxicity | 694 | 40.3 37.2–43.6ROR 40.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 35.3 EB05 33.2 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 2.2 (2.0–2.5) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=689 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Xeroderma | 32 | 38.1 26.3–55.1ROR 38.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 33.0 EB05 24.5 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anastomotic complication | 41 | 37.6 27.1–52.1ROR 37.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.8 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rectal perforation | 62 | 36.8 28.2–48.0ROR 36.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=62 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma recurrent | 238 | 35.4 30.9–40.4ROR 35.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 31.4 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=238 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Portal venous gas | 39 | 35.3 25.3–49.2ROR 35.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 31.0 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 1.9 (1.2–2.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Venoocclusive liver disease | 540 | 35.0 32.0–38.3ROR 35.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 31.2 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 2.6 (2.3–3.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=539 · 99% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | 592 | 32.0 29.4–34.8ROR 32.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 28.8 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 1.9 (1.7–2.1) | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious n=563 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Metastases to ovary | 32 | 31.8 22.1–45.9ROR 31.8 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 28.3 EB05 21.0 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dermatitis acneiform | 603 | 31.4 28.9–34.1ROR 31.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 28.3 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 3.3 (2.9–3.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=580 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Portal hypertension | 306 | 31.2 27.7–35.1ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 28.1 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=304 · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma refractory | 88 | 29.6 23.8–36.9ROR 29.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.8 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.6 (0.4–0.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=88 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Metastases to peritoneum | 235 | 29.4 25.7–33.6ROR 29.5 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.6 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=235 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastrointestinal toxicity | 440 | 29.2 26.5–32.2ROR 29.4 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.5 EB05 24.5 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=438 · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy | 159 | 29.0 24.6–34.2ROR 29.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.3 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 6.6 (4.8–9.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=159 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Colon cancer metastatic | 145 | 28.2 23.7–33.4ROR 28.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 25.6 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=144 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intravascular haemolysis | 50 | 28.0 20.9–37.4ROR 28.0 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 25.3 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=50 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pseudocirrhosis | 29 | 27.5 18.8–40.2ROR 27.5 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 24.8 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=29 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rectal adenocarcinoma | 52 | 27.0 20.3–35.9ROR 27.0 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 24.5 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=52 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Paronychia | 368 | 26.4 23.7–29.3ROR 26.5 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 24.1 EB05 22.1 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 3.5 (2.9–4.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=360 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 6,870 | 3.1 3.0–3.1ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.545 | 3.0 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.1 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 5,480 | 2.0 1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.977 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.9 (0.9–0.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.2 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 4,668 | 1.5 1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.686 | 1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.6 (0.6–0.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vomiting | 4,415 | 2.7 2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.694 | 2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.9 (0.9–0.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuropathy peripheral (nerve damage in hands/feet) | 4,317 | 13.6 13.2–14.0ROR 14.3 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 13.0 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 2.2 (2.1–2.3) | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 8.9 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Disease progression | 4,314 | 10.8 10.4–11.1ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 10.4 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.8 (0.8–0.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 7.0 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells)) | 4,206 | 9.1 8.8–9.4ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓ | 8.8 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.7 (0.7–0.7) | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 5.4 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Thrombocytopenia (low platelets) | 3,525 | 9.3 9.0–9.6ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓ | 9.0 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.7 (0.7–0.8) | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 5.5 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 3,084 | 1.6 1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.692 | 1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.8 (0.8–0.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.2 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 2,871 | 2.4 2.3–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.846 | 2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.7 (0.7–0.7) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 1.7 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 2,822 | 1.0 1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.329 | 1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.8 (0.7–0.8) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anaemia (low red blood cells) | 2,425 | 3.6 3.5–3.8ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.430 | 3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.4 (0.4–0.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Asthenia (weakness) | 2,360 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.839 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.8 (0.8–0.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.5 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Death | 2,314 | 0.8 0.7–0.8ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.159 | 0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.7 (0.6–0.7) | Outcome field, not a reaction boxed warning mentions mortality | serious PRR 0.5 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 2,147 | 0.5 0.4–0.5ROR 0.4 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓ | 0.5 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -1.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Platinum-based Drugs: PRR 0.6 (0.5–0.6) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 0.8 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Stomal varices — n=50, PRR 698.9
- Dysaesthesia pharynx — n=115, PRR 554.3
- Type ii hypersensitivity — n=56, PRR 260.9
- Ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas — n=110, PRR 189.8
- Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension — n=144, PRR 187.2
- Tumour perforation — n=91, PRR 117.8
- Gastrointestinal anastomotic leak — n=82, PRR 74.9
- Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency — n=43, PRR 71.1
- Anastomotic leak — n=123, PRR 61.0
- Rectal cancer metastatic — n=60, PRR 59.5
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Oxaliplatin ↔ Peripheral neuropathy.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Oxaliplatin?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Oxaliplatin are diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy peripheral, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Oxaliplatin have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS, INCLUDING ANAPHYLAXIS Serious and fatal hypersensitivity adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, can occur with oxaliplatin injection within minutes of administration and during any cycle.
Do FAERS signals prove that Oxaliplatin causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 1ac38523-480b-4c0f-97a1-7dfa1432923c, effective 20260414; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"OXALIPLATIN") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,227 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
OXALIPLATIN, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.