Pegfilgrastim side effects: what 98,102 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Neulasta
Who reports
98,102 reports · 29% serious · 5,274 with death outcome · 66% female
Used for
Neulasta is a leukocyte growth factor indicated in adult and pediatric patients to Decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia.
What it is
Pegfilgrastim is a covalent conjugate of recombinant methionyl human G-CSF (filgrastim) and monomethoxypolyethylene glycol. Filgrastim is a water-soluble 175 amino acid protein with a molecular weight of approximately 19 kilodaltons (kD). Filgrastim is obtained from the bacterial fermentation of a strain of E.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,149 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device adhesion issue | 11,734 | 751.9 723.7–781.2ROR 853.9 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓ | 164.8 EB05 162.4 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14,118.9 (7,595.7–26,244.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=62 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Unintentional medical device removal | 8,992 | 742.6 710.9–775.7ROR 817.4 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓ | 164.4 EB05 161.5 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27,049.1 (10,150.5–72,080.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=74 · 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Computerised tomogram thorax | 39 | 389.9 229.4–662.7ROR 390.0 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 128.6 EB05 98.2 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 12.0 (7.7–18.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=39 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device electrical finding | 407 | 291.6 251.0–338.8ROR 292.8 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 121.9 EB05 112.3 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Magnetic resonance imaging | 70 | 272.1 190.8–388.1ROR 272.3 · calibrated p 9e-11 ✓ | 115.4 EB05 94.4 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site extravasation | 40 | 239.9 152.4–377.6ROR 240.0 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓ | 106.9 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site haemorrhage | 1,397 | 220.8 204.9–238.0ROR 224.0 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 108.0 EB05 103.3 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=55 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device monitoring procedure not performed | 36 | 139.9 91.8–213.4ROR 140.0 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 80.9 EB05 61.0 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Aortic wall hypertrophy | 15 | 126.0 66.4–238.9ROR 126.0 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 72.1 EB05 46.4 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Colony stimulating factor therapy | 73 | 116.1 87.2–154.5ROR 116.2 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓ | 73.7 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27.4 (18.1–41.6) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=72 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Basal ganglion degeneration | 33 | 111.7 73.2–170.4ROR 111.8 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 70.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging | 55 | 104.0 75.3–143.7ROR 104.1 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 68.3 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site bruise | 277 | 85.4 74.3–98.2ROR 85.6 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 60.7 EB05 55.0 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Computerised tomogram | 37 | 77.7 53.3–113.2ROR 77.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 55.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device occlusion | 3,334 | 67.3 64.8–70.0ROR 69.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 51.2 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,114.3 (802.6–1,547.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=37 · 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site discomfort | 417 | 64.2 57.6–71.7ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 49.3 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Occupational exposure to product | 1,412 | 59.6 56.2–63.3ROR 60.5 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 46.6 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | ♀ 90% (drug 66%) · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Aortitis | 134 | 52.2 43.2–63.1ROR 52.3 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 41.8 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 26.0 (19.3–35.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=133 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device physical property issue | 1,387 | 48.5 45.8–51.4ROR 49.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 39.6 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 725.6 (480.7–1,095.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device use error | 6,048 | 46.0 44.8–47.3ROR 49.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 37.9 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 2,425.8 (1,694.9–3,471.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=78 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device power source issue | 486 | 43.6 39.6–48.1ROR 43.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 36.3 EB05 33.6 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site injury | 27 | 35.9 23.9–54.0ROR 35.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.2 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intercepted product preparation error | 1,574 | 31.6 30.0–33.3ROR 32.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 27.6 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 4,734.8 (1,775.0–12,630.3) | Not in label — unassessed | 99% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site mass | 35 | 30.7 21.6–43.8ROR 30.8 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.6 EB05 20.0 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Investigation | 392 | 30.0 27.0–33.3ROR 30.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.3 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=392 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Tissue infiltration | 36 | 29.9 21.1–42.3ROR 29.9 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 26.0 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device alarm issue | 206 | 27.5 23.8–31.8ROR 27.5 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 24.4 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuroblastoma recurrent | 23 | 27.4 17.8–42.4ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 23.9 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 5.5 (3.4–9.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Incorrect disposal of product | 359 | 26.9 24.1–30.0ROR 27.0 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 23.9 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal | 74 | 25.3 19.9–32.2ROR 25.3 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 22.6 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 11.9 (8.6–16.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=74 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device battery issue | 70 | 25.0 19.5–32.1ROR 25.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓ | 22.4 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device malfunction | 6,901 | 24.4 23.8–25.0ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 21.9 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 97.6 (91.0–104.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutrophil count abnormal | 277 | 23.2 20.5–26.2ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.9 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 42.2 (32.9–54.2) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=160 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site haematoma | 18 | 23.0 14.2–37.5ROR 23.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 20.4 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bone marrow necrosis | 19 | 18.6 11.7–29.8ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Arteritis | 49 | 17.8 13.3–23.8ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.3 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=49 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anaesthesia | 27 | 17.2 11.6–25.5ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 15.7 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nail bed inflammation | 23 | 16.6 10.9–25.4ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 15.0 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 12.6 (7.0–22.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intentional medical device removal by patient | 65 | 15.0 11.6–19.3ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 13.9 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device placement issue | 198 | 14.4 12.5–16.7ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 13.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device adhesion issue | 11,734 | 751.9 723.7–781.2ROR 853.9 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓ | 164.8 EB05 162.4 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14,118.9 (7,595.7–26,244.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=62 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wrong technique in product usage process | 10,255 | 11.4 11.2–11.6ROR 12.6 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 10.9 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,121.8 (930.0–1,353.0) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Unintentional medical device removal | 8,992 | 742.6 710.9–775.7ROR 817.4 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓ | 164.4 EB05 161.5 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27,049.1 (10,150.5–72,080.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=74 · 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device malfunction | 6,901 | 24.4 23.8–25.0ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 21.9 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 97.6 (91.0–104.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device use error | 6,048 | 46.0 44.8–47.3ROR 49.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 37.9 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 2,425.8 (1,694.9–3,471.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=78 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device issue | 5,150 | 13.4 13.0–13.7ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓ | 12.6 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 484.1 (406.4–576.6) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Accidental exposure to product | 4,999 | 11.2 10.9–11.5ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓ | 10.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 626.6 (512.2–766.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.4 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 3,787 | 0.9 0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.261 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14.5 (13.8–15.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.1 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Febrile neutropenia | 3,780 | 12.9 12.5–13.3ROR 13.4 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓ | 12.2 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 10.0 (9.6–10.4) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 24.0 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device occlusion | 3,334 | 67.3 64.8–70.0ROR 69.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 51.2 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,114.3 (802.6–1,547.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=37 · 97% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bone pain | 2,944 | 11.3 10.8–11.7ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 10.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 29.4 (27.5–31.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 14.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Death | 2,787 | 0.7 0.7–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.121 | 0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 11.5 (11.0–12.1) | Outcome field, not a reaction | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells)) | 2,668 | 4.3 4.1–4.4ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.316 | 4.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 8.7 (8.3–9.1) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 8.5 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 2,641 | 0.7 0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.140 | 0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 17.2 (16.3–18.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 2,507 | 1.6 1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.685 | 1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 10.4 (9.9–10.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 3.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Unintentional medical device removal — n=8,992, PRR 742.6
- Computerised tomogram thorax — n=39, PRR 389.9
- Basal ganglion degeneration — n=33, PRR 111.7
- Computerised tomogram — n=37, PRR 77.7
- Intercepted product preparation error — n=1,574, PRR 31.6
- Tissue infiltration — n=36, PRR 29.9
- Neuroblastoma recurrent — n=23, PRR 27.4
- Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal — n=74, PRR 25.3
- Anaesthesia — n=27, PRR 17.2
- Nail bed inflammation — n=23, PRR 16.6
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Pegfilgrastim?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pegfilgrastim are unintentional medical device removal, febrile neutropenia, bone pain, neutropenia, fatigue, pyrexia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Pegfilgrastim have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Pegfilgrastim has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Pegfilgrastim causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID fdfe5d72-6b80-435a-afa4-c5d74dd852ce, effective 20260810; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"PEGFILGRASTIM") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,189 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
PEGFILGRASTIM, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.