← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pegfilgrastim side effects: what 98,102 FDA adverse event reports show

Pegfilgrastim · Neulasta · 1,189 reaction terms · 208,973 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Leukocyte Growth Factor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Neulasta

openFDA label

Who reports

98,102 reports · 29% serious · 5,274 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Neulasta is a leukocyte growth factor indicated in adult and pediatric patients to Decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pegfilgrastim is a covalent conjugate of recombinant methionyl human G-CSF (filgrastim) and monomethoxypolyethylene glycol. Filgrastim is a water-soluble 175 amino acid protein with a molecular weight of approximately 19 kilodaltons (kD). Filgrastim is obtained from the bacterial fermentation of a strain of E.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 5Reporting / coding artifact 15Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 13
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,149 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device adhesion issue11,734751.9
723.7–781.2ROR 853.9 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓
164.8 EB05 162.4 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14,118.9 (7,595.7–26,244.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=62 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Unintentional medical device removal8,992742.6
710.9–775.7ROR 817.4 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓
164.4 EB05 161.5 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27,049.1 (10,150.5–72,080.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Computerised tomogram thorax39389.9
229.4–662.7ROR 390.0 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
128.6 EB05 98.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 12.0 (7.7–18.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device electrical finding407291.6
251.0–338.8ROR 292.8 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
121.9 EB05 112.3 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Magnetic resonance imaging70272.1
190.8–388.1ROR 272.3 · calibrated p 9e-11 ✓
115.4 EB05 94.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Application site haemorrhage1,397220.8
204.9–238.0ROR 224.0 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
108.0 EB05 103.3 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=55no trial arm names this drug
Device monitoring procedure not performed36139.9
91.8–213.4ROR 140.0 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
80.9 EB05 61.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial arm names this drug
Aortic wall hypertrophy15126.0
66.4–238.9ROR 126.0 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
72.1 EB05 46.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial arm names this drug
Colony stimulating factor therapy73116.1
87.2–154.5ROR 116.2 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
73.7 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27.4 (18.1–41.6)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=72 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Basal ganglion degeneration33111.7
73.2–170.4ROR 111.8 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
70.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging55104.0
75.3–143.7ROR 104.1 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
68.3 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Application site bruise27785.4
74.3–98.2ROR 85.6 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
60.7 EB05 55.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Computerised tomogram3777.7
53.3–113.2ROR 77.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
55.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessed100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device occlusion3,33467.3
64.8–70.0ROR 69.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
51.2 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,114.3 (802.6–1,547.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=37 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Application site discomfort41764.2
57.6–71.7ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
49.3 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
–no trial arm names this drug
Aortitis13452.2
43.2–63.1ROR 52.3 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
41.8 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 26.0 (19.3–35.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=133 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device physical property issue1,38748.5
45.8–51.4ROR 49.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
39.6 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 725.6 (480.7–1,095.4)
Reporting / coding artifact93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device use error6,04846.0
44.8–47.3ROR 49.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
37.9 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 2,425.8 (1,694.9–3,471.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=78 · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device power source issue48643.6
39.6–48.1ROR 43.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
36.3 EB05 33.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact98% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Intercepted product preparation error1,57431.6
30.0–33.3ROR 32.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.6 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 4,734.8 (1,775.0–12,630.3)
Not in label — unassessed99% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Investigation39230.0
27.0–33.3ROR 30.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.3 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=392 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Tissue infiltration3629.9
21.1–42.3ROR 29.9 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Device alarm issue20627.5
23.8–31.8ROR 27.5 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
24.4 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial arm names this drug
Neuroblastoma recurrent2327.4
17.8–42.4ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 5.5 (3.4–9.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Incorrect disposal of product35926.9
24.1–30.0ROR 27.0 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial arm names this drug
Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal7425.3
19.9–32.2ROR 25.3 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 11.9 (8.6–16.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device battery issue7025.0
19.5–32.1ROR 25.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.4 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device malfunction6,90124.4
23.8–25.0ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
21.9 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 97.6 (91.0–104.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3no trial arm names this drug
Neutrophil count abnormal27723.2
20.5–26.2ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.9 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 42.2 (32.9–54.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=160no trial arm names this drug
Bone marrow necrosis1918.6
11.7–29.8ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.7 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Arteritis4917.8
13.3–23.8ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.3 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=49 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anaesthesia2717.2
11.6–25.5ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.7 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Nail bed inflammation2316.6
10.9–25.4ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
15.0 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 12.6 (7.0–22.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Intentional medical device removal by patient6515.0
11.6–19.3ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.9 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Not in label — unassessed–no trial arm names this drug
Device placement issue19814.4
12.5–16.7ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Pegfilgrastim only as a background or rescue medication (NCT00070564, NCT00063999); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device adhesion issue11,734751.9
723.7–781.2ROR 853.9 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓
164.8 EB05 162.4 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14,118.9 (7,595.7–26,244.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=62 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Wrong technique in product usage process10,25511.4
11.2–11.6ROR 12.6 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
10.9 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,121.8 (930.0–1,353.0)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6no trial arm names this drug
Unintentional medical device removal8,992742.6
710.9–775.7ROR 817.4 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓
164.4 EB05 161.5 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 27,049.1 (10,150.5–72,080.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device malfunction6,90124.4
23.8–25.0ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
21.9 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 97.6 (91.0–104.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3no trial arm names this drug
Device use error6,04846.0
44.8–47.3ROR 49.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
37.9 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 2,425.8 (1,694.9–3,471.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=78 · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device issue5,15013.4
13.0–13.7ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
12.6 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 484.1 (406.4–576.6)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6no trial arm names this drug
Accidental exposure to product4,99911.2
10.9–11.5ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
10.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 626.6 (512.2–766.5)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,7870.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.261
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 14.5 (13.8–15.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1 · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Febrile neutropenia3,78012.9
12.5–13.3ROR 13.4 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
12.2 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 10.0 (9.6–10.4)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 24.0 · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device occlusion3,33467.3
64.8–70.0ROR 69.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
51.2 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 1,114.3 (802.6–1,547.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=37 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Bone pain2,94411.3
10.8–11.7ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
10.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 29.4 (27.5–31.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.8no trial arm names this drug
Death2,7870.7
0.7–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.121
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 11.5 (11.0–12.1)
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))2,6684.3
4.1–4.4ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.316
4.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 8.7 (8.3–9.1)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 8.5 · 90% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)2,6410.7
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.140
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Leukocyte Growth Factors: PRR 17.2 (16.3–18.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pegfilgrastim?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pegfilgrastim are unintentional medical device removal, febrile neutropenia, bone pain, neutropenia, fatigue, pyrexia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pegfilgrastim have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Pegfilgrastim has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pegfilgrastim causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.