← All drug classes
Drug class · FAERS comparison

Leukocyte Growth Factor side effects compared: 8 drugs, 143,489 FDA adverse event reports

Class as assigned in the FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · data 2026-09-14
How to read this page. Report counts are not incidence rates: a drug with more reports is usually older, more widely used or more publicised, not more dangerous. Signals are screened against each product's FDA label on its own page; a term flagged across most of a class usually reflects the shared mechanism or the shared patient population.

Members

DrugFAERS reportsSeriousDeath outcomeBoxed warningTop labeled signalsUnlabeled (unassessed)
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta)98,10229%5,274–Occupational exposure to product; Application site haemorrhage; Application site discomfortUnintentional medical device removal; Intercepted product preparation error
Filgrastim (Releuko)37,39588%8,445–Secondary immunodeficiency; Acute myeloid leukaemia recurrent; AortitisCytomegalovirus viraemia; Staphylococcal bacteraemia
Filgrastim-Sndz (Zarxio)3,28657%740–White blood cell count decreased; Bone pain; Platelet count decreasedNeoplasm malignant; Neuropathy peripheral
Sargramostim (Leukine)1,70373%250–Hypotension; Chills; SyncopeColitis
Pegfilgrastim-Cbqv (Udenyca)1,32821%127–Neutrophil count decreased–
Filgrastim-Aafi (Nivestym)64060%112–––
Pegfilgrastim-Bmez (Ziextenzo)59883%183––Candida infection; Restlessness
Pegfilgrastim-Jmdb (Fulphila)43766%84–––

Class-wide signals (flagged in at least 4 of 8 members)

ReactionMembers flaggedMedian PRRReports (sum)In label
Needle issue4/813.0650/4 members' labels

Member-specific signals (flagged in exactly one drug)

ReactionDrugReportsPRRLabel screen
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasiaFilgrastim14540,045.7Not in label — unassessed
Thymus hypoplasiaFilgrastim1432,925.4Not in label — unassessed
Human bocavirus infectionFilgrastim1241,070.2Not in label — unassessed
Unintentional medical device removalPegfilgrastim8,992742.6Not in label — unassessed
Blood stem cell harvest failureFilgrastim66450.1Not in label — unassessed
Cystitis bacterialFilgrastim110268.8Not in label — unassessed
Application site haemorrhagePegfilgrastim1,397220.8Labeled adverse reaction
Mycobacterium chelonae infectionFilgrastim165162.2Not in label — unassessed
Disseminated aspergillosisFilgrastim100152.2Not in label — unassessed
Meningitis tuberculousFilgrastim116145.6Not in label — unassessed
Secondary immunodeficiencyFilgrastim233136.0Labeled (related wording)
Abscess bacterialFilgrastim68131.8Not in label — unassessed
Corona virus infectionFilgrastim5987.8Not in label — unassessed
Application site bruisePegfilgrastim27785.4Labeled adverse reaction
Pseudomonal sepsisFilgrastim23184.6Not in label — unassessed
Parainfluenzae virus infectionFilgrastim16265.5Not in label — unassessed
Application site discomfortPegfilgrastim41764.2Labeled adverse reaction
Occupational exposure to productPegfilgrastim1,41259.6Labeled (related wording)
Enterobacter infectionFilgrastim14854.2Not in label — unassessed
Human herpesvirus 6 infectionFilgrastim16653.5Not in label — unassessed
Acute myeloid leukaemia recurrentFilgrastim18553.3Labeled (related wording)
ViraemiaFilgrastim10646.2Not in label — unassessed
Neutropenic infectionFilgrastim7345.8Likely indication confounding
Diffuse alveolar damageFilgrastim7941.2Not in label — unassessed
Cytomegalovirus viraemiaFilgrastim25734.9Not in label — unassessed

Common questions

Which leukocyte growth factor has the most FDA adverse event reports?

Pegfilgrastim has the most FAERS co-reports in this class (98,102), followed by Filgrastim (37,395). Report volume tracks how widely and how long a drug has been used, and how much attention it has had, far more than its risk.

Which side effects are shared across leukocyte growth factor drugs?

Reaction terms flagged in at least half of the 8 members include needle issue. A term shared across a class usually reflects the shared mechanism (or the shared patient population) rather than one product.

Does a FAERS signal mean the drug causes the reaction?

No. These are disproportionality signals from voluntary reports with no denominator. Each is screened against the FDA label (known vs unlabeled) on the drug pages; causality needs temporality, dose-response, plausibility and trial or cohort evidence.

Sources: openFDA FAERS pair statistics (OpenPV build 2026-09-14), FDA labels via openFDA, seriousness and death counts from openFDA count queries. Generated 2026-10-08. Not medical advice.