← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Phytonadione side effects: what 8,433 FDA adverse event reports show

Phytonadione · 1,116 reaction terms · 47,803 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Vitamin K, Warfarin Reversal Agent

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

8,433 reports · 80% serious · 1,581 with death outcome · 53% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Phytonadione injectable emulsion is a vitamin K replacement indicated for the treatment of the following coagulation disorders which are due to faulty formation of factors II, VII, IX and X when caused by vitamin K deficiency or interference with vitamin K activity.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Phytonadione is a vitamin K replacement, which is a clear, yellow to amber, viscous, odorless or nearly odorless liquid. It is insoluble in water, soluble in chloroform and slightly soluble in ethanol. It has a molecular weight of 450.70. Phytonadione is 2-methyl-3-phytyl-1, 4-naphthoquinone.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

-HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS WITH INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAMUSCULAR USE Fatal hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, have occurred during and immediately after intravenous and intramuscular injection of phytonadione injectable emulsion. Reactions have occurred despite dilution to avoid rapid intravenous infusion and upon first dose.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 8Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,076 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Appendicolith2655,908.3
4,735.4–7,371.6ROR 6,099.9 · χ² 457,390 / p <1e-300
1,539.1 EB05 1,389.8 · IC025 +8.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=265 · ♀ 3% (drug 53%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Sleep disorder therapy1305,904.1
4,301.9–8,103.1ROR 5,996.5 · χ² 223,451 / p <1e-300
1,378.3 EB05 1,190.6 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=130 · ♀ 5% (drug 53%) · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Antacid therapy845,886.0
3,970.2–8,726.1ROR 5,945.2 · χ² 143,643 / p <1e-300
1,238.5 EB05 1,031.7 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=84 · ♀ 8% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Analgesic therapy1251,722.3
1,371.5–2,162.7ROR 1,748.1 · χ² 125,314 / p <1e-300
875.4 EB05 754.0 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=125 · ♀ 5% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug therapy1121,346.5
1,070.3–1,693.8ROR 1,364.6 · χ² 96,344 / p <1e-300
756.4 EB05 645.9 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=112 · ♀ 6% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Anticoagulant therapy821,047.4
809.5–1,355.3ROR 1,057.7 · χ² 59,339 / p <1e-300
626.2 EB05 520.5 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=82 · ♀ 8% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Congenital hiatus hernia56842.6
622.4–1,140.6ROR 848.2 · χ² 34,412 / p <1e-300
516.1 EB05 412.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Malignant melanoma stage 043775.4
550.7–1,091.9ROR 779.4 · χ² 24,683 / p <1e-300
466.5 EB05 360.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Bacteroides infection39440.8
313.7–619.4ROR 442.8 · χ² 14,135 / p <1e-300
315.8 EB05 241.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hyperphosphataemia164208.6
178.1–244.3ROR 212.7 · χ² 31,041 / p <1e-300
188.1 EB05 165.2 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=164 · ♀ 7% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic63183.5
142.2–236.8ROR 184.9 · χ² 10,470 / p <1e-300
162.5 EB05 131.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood phosphorus increased183179.0
154.3–207.7ROR 183.0 · χ² 30,030 / p <1e-300
164.1 EB05 145.1 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=183 · ♀ 4% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Factor v inhibition13176.1
100.4–309.1ROR 176.4 · χ² 1,952 / p <1e-300
132.8 EB05 82.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=13no trial data cached
Cutaneous mucormycosis11163.5
88.8–300.9ROR 163.7 · χ² 1,517 / p <1e-300
121.6 EB05 72.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Vitamin k deficiency18117.7
73.4–188.8ROR 118.0 · χ² 1,878 / p <1e-300
100.7 EB05 67.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=17no trial data cached
Total lung capacity decreased68110.2
86.5–140.4ROR 111.1 · χ² 6,940 / p <1e-300
102.6 EB05 83.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=68 · ♀ 10% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Restrictive cardiomyopathy1192.7
50.8–169.2ROR 92.8 · χ² 875 / p 1e-192
77.7 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged15377.2
65.8–90.5ROR 78.6 · χ² 11,082 / p <1e-300
74.2 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=152 · ♀ 12% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Appendicitis27575.8
67.3–85.3ROR 78.3 · χ² 19,623 / p <1e-300
73.2 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 53.4 · ♀ 3% (drug 53%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Iron deficiency13074.9
63.0–89.0ROR 76.0 · χ² 9,123 / p <1e-300
71.9 EB05 62.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=128 · ♀ 11% (drug 53%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis14165.6
55.6–77.4ROR 66.7 · χ² 8,674 / p <1e-300
63.4 EB05 55.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=134no trial data cached
Blood uric acid increased14765.0
55.3–76.5ROR 66.1 · χ² 8,965 / p <1e-300
62.9 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=147 · ♀ 5% (drug 53%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Necrotising enterocolitis neonatal1063.4
33.8–118.7ROR 63.4 · χ² 539 / p 1e-119
55.6 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10no trial data cached
Hypophosphataemia17661.0
52.6–70.8ROR 62.3 · χ² 10,083 / p <1e-300
59.2 EB05 52.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 44.6 · ♀ 10% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Aortic stenosis8259.9
48.2–74.5ROR 60.5 · χ² 4,581 / p <1e-300
57.8 EB05 48.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=82 · ♀ 11% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Lung opacity6059.3
46.0–76.6ROR 59.7 · χ² 3,302 / p <1e-300
56.9 EB05 45.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · ♀ 13% (drug 53%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Myasthenia gravis18158.5
50.5–67.7ROR 59.7 · χ² 9,935 / p <1e-300
56.8 EB05 50.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 41.8 · ♀ 4% (drug 53%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Hyphaema1258.2
32.8–103.1ROR 58.2 · χ² 604 / p 1e-133
52.4 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Ventricular fibrillation24956.8
50.2–64.3ROR 58.5 · χ² 13,303 / p <1e-300
55.4 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 39.9 · ♀ 3% (drug 53%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Intraventricular haemorrhage neonatal1052.0
27.8–97.2ROR 52.0 · χ² 441 / p 4e-98
46.7 EB05 27.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10no trial data cached
Cardiogenic shock27047.9
42.6–54.0ROR 49.5 · χ² 12,133 / p <1e-300
46.9 EB05 42.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.6 · ♀ 5% (drug 53%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Pleuritic pain4944.7
33.7–59.3ROR 45.0 · χ² 2,014 / p <1e-300
43.2 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis respiratory infection suppression1542.1
25.3–70.2ROR 42.2 · χ² 553 / p 2e-122
39.5 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=15no trial data cached
Jaundice neonatal2837.2
25.6–54.0ROR 37.3 · χ² 937 / p 5e-206
35.9 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=28 · ♀ 27% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Respiratory symptom4036.0
26.4–49.2ROR 36.2 · χ² 1,307 / p 1e-286
35.0 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · ♀ 0% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Enterococcal sepsis1133.9
18.7–61.5ROR 34.0 · χ² 315 / p 9e-71
31.8 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Troponin increased10033.4
27.4–40.6ROR 33.8 · χ² 3,068 / p <1e-300
32.8 EB05 27.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 24.3 · ♀ 9% (drug 53%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome35231.8
28.6–35.2ROR 33.1 · χ² 10,334 / p <1e-300
31.3 EB05 28.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.4 · ♀ 12% (drug 53%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Ascites36631.3
28.3–34.6ROR 32.7 · χ² 10,590 / p <1e-300
30.9 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.4 · ♀ 15% (drug 53%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)7052.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 378 / p 2e-84
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Nausea6792.1
2.0–2.3ROR 2.2 · χ² 427 / p 3e-95
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Vomiting5713.0
2.8–3.3ROR 3.2 · χ² 792 / p 2e-174
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)5641.8
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 210 / p 9e-48
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5442.4
2.2–2.6ROR 2.5 · χ² 451 / p 2e-100
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5201.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.342
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)48110.8
9.9–11.7ROR 11.3 · χ² 4,252 / p <1e-300
10.7 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.7 · ♀ 26% (drug 53%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Abdominal pain4624.9
4.5–5.4ROR 5.2 · χ² 1,465 / p <1e-300
4.9 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5 · ♀ 27% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4581.8
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36
1.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Constipation4435.1
4.7–5.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 1,467 / p <1e-300
5.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7 · ♀ 31% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Condition aggravated4083.4
3.1–3.7ROR 3.5 · χ² 684 / p 5e-151
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · ♀ 31% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Headache4051.6
1.5–1.8ROR 1.6 · χ² 95 / p 8e-23
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Abdominal distension (bloating)3999.6
8.7–10.5ROR 10.0 · χ² 3,059 / p <1e-300
9.5 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6 · ♀ 19% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)3845.0
4.5–5.5ROR 5.2 · χ² 1,237 / p 2e-271
5.0 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.9 · ♀ 32% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Ascites36631.3
28.3–34.6ROR 32.7 · χ² 10,590 / p <1e-300
30.9 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.4 · ♀ 15% (drug 53%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Phytonadione?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Phytonadione are nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dyspnoea, sepsis, abdominal pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Phytonadione have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: -HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS WITH INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAMUSCULAR USE Fatal hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, have occurred during and immediately after intravenous and intramuscular injection of phytonadione injectable emulsion. Reactions have occurred despite dilution to avoid rapid intravenous infusion and upon first dose.

Do FAERS signals prove that Phytonadione causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.