← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pimavanserin side effects: what 54,981 FDA adverse event reports show

Pimavanserin Tartrate · 1,008 reaction terms · 149,240 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Atypical antipsychotic

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

54,981 reports · 51% serious · 14,132 with death outcome · 39% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Pimavanserin capsule is indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis . Pimavanserin capsule is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis. (1)

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pimavanserin capsule contains pimavanserin, an atypical antipsychotic, which is present as pimavanserin tartrate salt with the chemical name, urea, N-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-N-(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)-N’-[[4-(2-methylpropoxy)phenyl]methyl]-,(2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioate (2:1).

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Pimavanserin is not approve.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 3Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 3Not in label — unassessed 30
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 968 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Speech-language therapy11825.8
286.9–2,376.7ROR 826.0 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
179.0 EB05 106.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7not reported in cached trials
Occupational therapy18250.2
137.8–454.3ROR 250.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
130.1 EB05 87.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9not reported in cached trials
Dementia with lewy bodies413243.4
215.1–275.4ROR 245.2 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
147.0 EB05 135.5 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=365 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Patient elopement104166.8
132.4–210.1ROR 167.1 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
113.4 EB05 96.3 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=68 · 85% consumernot reported in cached trials
Nonspecific reaction1,156104.2
97.7–111.2ROR 106.4 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
81.7 EB05 77.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=517 · 72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Delusion2,77083.1
79.8–86.5ROR 87.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
68.2 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 47.4 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Physiotherapy9081.2
64.7–102.0ROR 81.3 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
66.0 EB05 55.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hallucination (hallucinations)12,70277.8
76.5–79.2ROR 100.9 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
64.6 EB05 63.7 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 48.8 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder5662.2
46.9–82.5ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
52.6 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Metabolic function test abnormal4459.2
43.1–81.3ROR 59.2 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
50.2 EB05 39.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hallucination, visual2,32247.4
45.4–49.5ROR 49.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
42.2 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 32.6 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hallucination, tactile7246.7
36.5–59.6ROR 46.7 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
41.2 EB05 33.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=42 · 86% consumernot reported in cached trials
Medical device battery replacement1239.2
21.6–71.0ROR 39.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
33.8 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Belligerence3937.7
27.1–52.4ROR 37.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.9 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Confusional arousal1436.7
21.2–63.6ROR 36.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
32.2 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Hallucinations, mixed35334.9
31.3–38.9ROR 35.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.9 EB05 29.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=202 · 91% consumernot reported in cached trials
Patient uncooperative3228.1
19.6–40.3ROR 28.1 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.9 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Feeding tube user2528.0
18.7–42.1ROR 28.0 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.7 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Deep brain stimulation3927.4
19.8–37.9ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.3 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 87% consumernot reported in cached trials
Prescribed underdose1,18424.0
22.7–25.5ROR 24.5 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.4not reported in cached trials
Posture abnormal18723.2
20.0–26.9ROR 23.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.9 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=75not reported in cached trials
Sleep talking9221.7
17.6–26.7ROR 21.7 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.5 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Defiant behaviour1621.1
12.8–35.0ROR 21.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
19.5 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Adult failure to thrive1121.0
11.4–38.5ROR 21.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
18.9 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Freezing phenomenon18420.5
17.7–23.8ROR 20.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.5 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=87 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dementia1,39320.0
19.0–21.1ROR 20.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.1 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 18.0 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Stubbornness2119.3
12.5–30.0ROR 19.3 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
18.0 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8 · 90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Multiple system atrophy1719.3
11.8–31.4ROR 19.3 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.9 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Hallucination, olfactory2018.6
11.9–29.1ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.3 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12 · 90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Suture insertion2517.2
11.5–25.6ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.1 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Soliloquy3717.1
12.3–23.8ROR 17.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.2 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17 · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Trance1415.1
8.8–25.7ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.5 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Abnormal behaviour1,50114.9
14.1–15.7ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
14.3 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9not reported in cached trials
Medical device change2014.8
9.5–23.1ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.6 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15 · 90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Resting tremor2414.6
9.7–22.0ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.6 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Paranoia63914.6
13.5–15.8ROR 14.7 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.1 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4 · 73% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drooling23113.2
11.6–15.1ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.8 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=94not reported in cached trials
Bradykinesia19112.9
11.2–14.9ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.4 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=102 · 94% consumernot reported in cached trials
Illusion5412.7
9.7–16.7ROR 12.7 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
12.1 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Slow speech7712.6
10.0–15.8ROR 12.6 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
12.1 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 94% consumernot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Pimavanserin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hallucination (hallucinations)12,70277.8
76.5–79.2ROR 100.9 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
64.6 EB05 63.7 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 48.8 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Death10,8284.8
4.8–4.9ROR 5.8 · calibrated p 0.165
4.8 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 5.4not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)6,3531.8
1.8–1.9ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.919
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8 · 70% consumernot reported in cached trials
Product dose omission issue4,3545.9
5.7–6.1ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.130
5.8 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.0 · 88% consumernot reported in cached trials
Confusional state (confusion)4,28710.3
10.1–10.7ROR 11.1 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.1 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.3 · 71% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fall4,0054.6
4.5–4.8ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.243
4.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3 · 72% consumerNCT03575052: 1/392 (0.3%) on Pimavanserin; 1/392 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Delusion2,77083.1
79.8–86.5ROR 87.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
68.2 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 47.4 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated2,4303.1
3.0–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.570
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4 · 86% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hallucination, visual2,32247.4
45.4–49.5ROR 49.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
42.2 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 32.6 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Gait disturbance2,1924.4
4.2–4.6ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.291
4.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Urinary tract infection (bladder infection)1,8094.1
3.9–4.3ROR 4.2 · calibrated p 0.343
4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5 · 73% consumerNCT03575052: 25/392 (6.4%) on Pimavanserin; 16/392 (4.1%) control
Somnolence (drowsiness)1,7333.3
3.2–3.5ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.514
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Adverse drug reaction1,6627.2
6.9–7.6ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.084
7.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5 · 72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Product use issue1,6073.3
3.1–3.5ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.519
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 87% consumernot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Pimavanserin Tartrate ↔ Hallucination.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pimavanserin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pimavanserin are hallucination, confusional state, fall, delusion, hallucination, visual, gait disturbance. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pimavanserin have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Pimavanserin is not approve.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pimavanserin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.