← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ranitidine Hydrochloride side effects: what 54,034 FDA adverse event reports show

Ranitidine Hydrochloride · 1,128 reaction terms · 147,645 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

54,034 reports · 95% serious · 4,399 with death outcome · 51% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Ranitidine Tablets are indicated in: Short- term treatment of active duodenal ulcer. Most patients heal within 4 weeks. Studies available to date have not assessed the safety of Ranitidine in uncomplicated duodenal ulcer for periods of more than 8 weeks. Maintenance therapy for duodenal ulcer patients at reduced dosage after healing of acute ulcers.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Ranitidine Tablets USP are available for oral administration containing 150 mg or 300 mg of ranitidine. The active ingredient in Ranitidine Tablets USP, 150 mg and 300 mg is Ranitidine hydrochloride (HCl), USP, a histamine H 2 -receptor antagonist.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 1Not in label — unassessed 36
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,088 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Computerised tomogram thorax26292.1
175.3–486.7ROR 292.2 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
148.1 EB05 106.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Junctional ectopic tachycardia20206.5
119.8–355.7ROR 206.5 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
119.3 EB05 81.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Synovial fluid analysis25156.5
98.3–249.3ROR 156.6 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
102.8 EB05 73.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Haemorrhage foetal15146.9
81.0–266.5ROR 146.9 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
94.0 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Hepatic enzyme37139.9
96.0–203.9ROR 140.0 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
97.6 EB05 74.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia75125.1
96.4–162.3ROR 125.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
92.3 EB05 76.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=75 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nasal cavity cancer17087.6
74.2–103.5ROR 87.9 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
70.9 EB05 62.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=170 · ♀ 30% (drug 51%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Foramen magnum stenosis1363.7
35.4–114.5ROR 63.7 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
50.9 EB05 31.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer stage i, with cancer in situ3061.6
41.9–90.6ROR 61.6 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
51.5 EB05 37.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Temperature regulation disorder29761.0
54.0–68.9ROR 61.3 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
52.6 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=297 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Neoplasm of appendix1561.0
35.3–105.1ROR 61.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
49.6 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Osteoporosis postmenopausal1960.5
37.3–98.1ROR 60.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
49.9 EB05 33.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Foetal anaemia1549.8
29.1–85.3ROR 49.8 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
42.0 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Small intestine carcinoma25449.3
43.2–56.1ROR 49.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.6 EB05 39.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=254 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sinobronchitis1749.2
29.7–81.5ROR 49.2 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
41.8 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Colorectal cancer5,10245.7
44.5–47.0ROR 50.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
40.9 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.7 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Airway remodelling1345.1
25.4–80.2ROR 45.2 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
38.4 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Renal cancer4,84643.3
42.1–44.5ROR 47.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
39.0 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.8 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Oesophageal carcinoma2,99843.0
41.4–44.6ROR 45.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
38.7 EB05 37.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 23.4 · ♀ 27% (drug 51%) · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hepatic cancer2,34341.4
39.7–43.2ROR 43.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
37.4 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.7 · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Gallbladder cancer13639.4
33.0–46.9ROR 39.5 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
35.6 EB05 30.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=136 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Gastric cancer2,32138.6
37.0–40.3ROR 40.3 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
35.1 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 21.2 · 98% consumerNCT00401752: 2/107 (1.9%) on Ranitidine Hydrochloride (serious AE)
Gastrointestinal carcinoma81037.5
34.9–40.3ROR 38.1 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
34.2 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Prostate cancer7,12637.3
36.4–38.1ROR 42.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
34.0 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.6 · ♀ 1% (drug 51%) · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer5,17336.8
35.9–37.9ROR 40.6 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
33.7 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.4 · ♀ 26% (drug 51%) · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer7,73434.7
34.0–35.5ROR 40.4 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
31.9 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.4 · ♀ 98% (drug 51%) · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome25834.5
30.4–39.2ROR 34.7 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.7 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=258 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendix cancer7634.1
27.0–43.1ROR 34.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
31.2 EB05 25.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Paranasal sinus inflammation1733.0
20.1–54.1ROR 33.0 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
29.5 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Carbuncle2232.7
21.2–50.5ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
29.5 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Throat cancer32932.5
29.0–36.3ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.0 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=329 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pancreatic carcinoma2,24432.4
31.1–33.8ROR 33.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.0 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.1 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Splenic neoplasm malignancy unspecified1031.6
16.6–60.2ROR 31.6 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
27.7 EB05 15.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Overlap syndrome5030.3
22.7–40.4ROR 30.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.9 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease28229.4
26.1–33.2ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.4 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=282 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Oesophageal polyp1328.4
16.2–49.8ROR 28.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
25.5 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=13not reported in cached trials
Urethral cancer1426.5
15.4–45.5ROR 26.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
24.0 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Renal cancer stage i16926.3
22.5–30.8ROR 26.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
24.6 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=169not reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii40325.9
23.4–28.6ROR 26.1 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.3 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=403 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Schizoaffective disorder11225.8
21.3–31.2ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.1 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=112 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Ranitidine Hydrochloride as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Breast cancer7,73434.7
34.0–35.5ROR 40.4 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
31.9 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.4 · ♀ 98% (drug 51%) · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Prostate cancer7,12637.3
36.4–38.1ROR 42.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
34.0 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.6 · ♀ 1% (drug 51%) · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer5,17336.8
35.9–37.9ROR 40.6 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
33.7 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.4 · ♀ 26% (drug 51%) · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Colorectal cancer5,10245.7
44.5–47.0ROR 50.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
40.9 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.7 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Renal cancer4,84643.3
42.1–44.5ROR 47.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
39.0 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.8 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Oesophageal carcinoma2,99843.0
41.4–44.6ROR 45.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
38.7 EB05 37.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 23.4 · ♀ 27% (drug 51%) · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Neoplasm malignant2,74916.6
16.0–17.3ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.0 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hepatic cancer2,34341.4
39.7–43.2ROR 43.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
37.4 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.7 · 97% consumernot reported in cached trials
Gastric cancer2,32138.6
37.0–40.3ROR 40.3 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
35.1 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 21.2 · 98% consumerNCT00401752: 2/107 (1.9%) on Ranitidine Hydrochloride (serious AE)
Pancreatic carcinoma2,24432.4
31.1–33.8ROR 33.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.0 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.1 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Lung neoplasm malignant1,96319.3
18.5–20.2ROR 20.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
18.4 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Injury1,78010.0
9.6–10.5ROR 10.3 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
9.8 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.5not reported in cached trials
Pain1,5411.0
0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.288
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 0.9 · ♀ 90% (drug 51%)NCT00401752: 2/110 (1.8%) on Ranitidine Hydrochloride
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,4440.6
0.6–0.7ROR 0.6 · calibrated p 0.100
0.6 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.6 · ♀ 89% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,2540.4
0.3–0.4ROR 0.4 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
0.4 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -1.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.5 · ♀ 83% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Ranitidine (Zantac) ↔ Cancer (breast, prostate, bladder, colorectal, renal).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ranitidine Hydrochloride?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ranitidine Hydrochloride are breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, renal cancer, oesophageal carcinoma. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ranitidine Hydrochloride have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Ranitidine Hydrochloride has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ranitidine Hydrochloride causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.