← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Sotatercept-Csrk side effects: what 4,929 FDA adverse event reports show

Sotatercept-Csrk · 214 reaction terms · 11,377 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

No validated FDA label found

Who reports

4,929 reports · 57% serious · 208 with death outcome · 77% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

—

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 10Lab value / disease marker 3No label text to screen 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 174 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infusion site pain13344.0
37.2–52.1ROR 45.2 · χ² 5,496 / p <1e-300
43.3 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=53 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Pericardial effusion14927.3
23.3–32.0ROR 28.1 · χ² 3,724 / p <1e-300
27.0 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 28.2no trial data cached
Dyspnoea exertional22325.0
22.0–28.4ROR 26.1 · χ² 5,095 / p <1e-300
24.8 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 24.2no trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)44324.9
22.8–27.2ROR 27.2 · χ² 10,105 / p <1e-300
24.7 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 18.8no trial data cached
Pain in jaw16324.2
20.8–28.2ROR 25.0 · χ² 3,585 / p <1e-300
24.0 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 25.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Complication associated with device7323.2
18.5–29.2ROR 23.6 · χ² 1,523 / p <1e-300
23.0 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Pulmonary arterial hypertension7220.8
16.5–26.2ROR 21.1 · χ² 1,331 / p 1e-291
20.6 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 22.0no trial data cached
Therapy change3816.6
12.1–22.7ROR 16.7 · χ² 538 / p 3e-119
16.3 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=34no trial data cached
Pulmonary hypertension8116.3
13.1–20.2ROR 16.5 · χ² 1,142 / p 1e-250
16.1 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 16.1no trial data cached
Dermatitis contact4315.9
11.8–21.4ROR 16.0 · χ² 584 / p 3e-129
15.7 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=18 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Decreased activity4015.7
11.5–21.4ROR 15.8 · χ² 533 / p 3e-118
15.4 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 19.5 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Seasonal allergy5014.9
11.3–19.6ROR 15.0 · χ² 631 / p 1e-139
14.7 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=24 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Weight fluctuation3012.1
8.5–17.3ROR 12.1 · χ² 293 / p 5e-66
11.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=22 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Dizziness postural2611.4
7.7–16.7ROR 11.4 · χ² 235 / p 3e-53
10.6 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=18 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Oxygen saturation decreased15011.3
9.6–13.2ROR 11.6 · χ² 1,395 / p <1e-300
11.2 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 11.5 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Device occlusion3711.2
8.1–15.4ROR 11.2 · χ² 331 / p 2e-74
10.7 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=23no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding319.5
6.7–13.5ROR 9.6 · χ² 227 / p 1e-51
8.8 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Fluid retention1109.1
7.5–10.9ROR 9.3 · χ² 782 / p 2e-172
8.9 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 11.3 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Blood test abnormal309.0
6.3–12.8ROR 9.0 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
8.2 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Haemoptysis548.1
6.2–10.6ROR 8.2 · χ² 329 / p 9e-74
7.7 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 7.2no trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal568.0
6.1–10.3ROR 8.0 · χ² 334 / p 7e-75
7.6 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Internal haemorrhage217.7
5.0–11.8ROR 7.7 · χ² 115 / p 3e-27
6.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 7.7no trial data cached
Therapy non-responder807.5
6.1–9.4ROR 7.6 · χ² 446 / p 2e-99
7.3 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.0 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Brain fog236.6
4.4–9.9ROR 6.6 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
5.9 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 7.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy partial responder236.4
4.3–9.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
5.7 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.8 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Blood iron decreased186.4
4.0–10.1ROR 6.4 · χ² 77 / p 1e-18
5.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted1046.3
5.2–7.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 461 / p 1e-102
6.2 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.0no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue306.2
4.3–8.8ROR 6.2 · χ² 125 / p 3e-29
5.7 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Flushing1476.0
5.1–7.1ROR 6.2 · χ² 614 / p 7e-136
5.9 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 9.2 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Hypoxia (low oxygen)506.0
4.5–7.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 202 / p 3e-46
5.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Device leakage595.8
4.5–7.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 232 / p 1e-52
5.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=20 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Syringe issue235.5
3.7–8.3ROR 5.5 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.0 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=3no trial data cached
Device dislocation565.4
4.2–7.0ROR 5.5 · χ² 197 / p 5e-45
5.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Sinus congestion175.3
3.3–8.5ROR 5.3 · χ² 54 / p 8e-14
4.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=10no trial data cached
Nasal congestion (stuffy nose)735.2
4.2–6.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 246 / p 1e-55
5.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 6.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage1045.2
4.3–6.3ROR 5.3 · χ² 348 / p 7e-78
5.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Iron deficiency anaemia115.0
2.8–9.1ROR 5.0 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
4.2 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Ear discomfort124.9
2.8–8.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
4.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=10no trial data cached
Platelet count decreased1234.8
4.1–5.8ROR 4.9 · χ² 372 / p 3e-83
4.8 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Injection site irritation144.6
2.7–7.8ROR 4.6 · χ² 36 / p 8e-10
4.1 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Headache6684.5
4.2–4.8ROR 5.0 · χ² 1,849 / p <1e-300
4.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.2 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5444.0
3.7–4.4ROR 4.4 · χ² 1,269 / p 4e-278
4.0 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5213.4
3.1–3.7ROR 3.7 · χ² 904 / p 8e-199
3.4 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.6 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)44324.9
22.8–27.2ROR 27.2 · χ² 10,105 / p <1e-300
24.7 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 18.8no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)4162.2
2.0–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 296 / p 1e-66
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Nausea4042.1
2.0–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 255 / p 1e-57
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screenserious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Dizziness4023.4
3.1–3.7ROR 3.6 · χ² 688 / p 7e-152
3.4 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Dyspnoea exertional22325.0
22.0–28.4ROR 26.1 · χ² 5,095 / p <1e-300
24.8 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 24.2no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue2002.9
2.6–3.4ROR 3.0 · χ² 258 / p 3e-58
2.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Cough1942.9
2.5–3.3ROR 3.0 · χ² 243 / p 4e-55
2.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Hypotension (low blood pressure)1914.0
3.5–4.6ROR 4.1 · χ² 429 / p 1e-95
4.0 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Pain in extremity1872.7
2.3–3.1ROR 2.7 · χ² 194 / p 3e-44
2.6 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Weight decreased (weight loss)1832.7
2.4–3.2ROR 2.8 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Peripheral swelling1654.5
3.9–5.2ROR 4.6 · χ² 449 / p 6e-100
4.4 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.1 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Pain in jaw16324.2
20.8–28.2ROR 25.0 · χ² 3,585 / p <1e-300
24.0 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 25.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Sotatercept-Csrk?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Sotatercept-Csrk are headache, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, epistaxis, fatigue, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Sotatercept-Csrk have an FDA boxed warning?

No validated FDA label could be retrieved for this product name, so this page cannot say.

Do FAERS signals prove that Sotatercept-Csrk causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.