← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Theophylline Anhydrous side effects: what 12,326 FDA adverse event reports show

Theophylline Anhydrous · 1,156 reaction terms · 72,255 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

12,326 reports · 82% serious · 1,787 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Theophylline extended-release tablets are indicated for the treatment of the symptoms and reversible airflow obstruction associated with chronic asthma and other chronic lung diseases, e.g., emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Theophylline, USP is structurally classified as a methylxanthine. It occurs as a white, odorless, crystalline powder with a bitter taste. Anhydrous theophylline has the chemical na.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 7Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,116 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Amyloid arthropathy5919,797.8
7,947.2–49,319.9ROR 19,893.1 · χ² 89,706 / p <1e-300
1,027.3 EB05 825.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Right atrial hypertrophy886,711.1
4,207.7–10,704.1ROR 6,759.4 · χ² 116,742 / p <1e-300
1,037.4 EB05 867.8 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Antasthmatic drug level above therapeutic174,074.6
1,690.0–9,823.9ROR 4,080.2 · χ² 19,022 / p <1e-300
507.1 EB05 335.3 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Heart sounds612,924.1
1,930.5–4,429.3ROR 2,938.7 · χ² 63,925 / p <1e-300
797.7 EB05 643.4 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Decreased bronchial secretion151,094.2
571.1–2,096.5ROR 1,095.5 · χ² 9,265 / p <1e-300
358.8 EB05 230.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=15not reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy44984.3
678.7–1,427.5ROR 987.8 · χ² 26,624 / p <1e-300
488.3 EB05 378.8 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=44 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Occupational asthma21952.3
557.6–1,626.3ROR 953.9 · χ² 12,130 / p <1e-300
390.8 EB05 269.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Bronchial neoplasm46867.2
607.7–1,237.3ROR 870.4 · χ² 25,669 / p <1e-300
461.7 EB05 360.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=46 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Rhinitis perennial26807.8
506.1–1,289.3ROR 809.5 · χ² 13,603 / p <1e-300
389.0 EB05 279.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy53678.8
493.6–933.5ROR 681.7 · χ² 25,058 / p <1e-300
411.5 EB05 326.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=53 · ♀ 13% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Prolonged expiration62522.7
393.3–694.8ROR 525.4 · χ² 24,220 / p <1e-300
355.0 EB05 286.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Product administration issue18511.9
302.1–867.4ROR 512.6 · χ² 6,646 / p <1e-300
277.0 EB05 185.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy60414.3
312.5–549.2ROR 416.3 · χ² 19,508 / p <1e-300
300.6 EB05 242.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=60 · ♀ 31% (drug 60%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adulterated product34365.7
252.4–529.7ROR 366.7 · χ² 9,855 / p <1e-300
257.1 EB05 192.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicolith67365.0
280.4–475.1ROR 367.0 · χ² 19,677 / p <1e-300
276.3 EB05 225.1 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · ♀ 28% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug therapy56361.4
270.9–482.1ROR 363.0 · χ² 16,263 / p <1e-300
270.1 EB05 215.8 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=56 · ♀ 31% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchial haemorrhage49313.8
231.4–425.5ROR 315.0 · χ² 12,608 / p <1e-300
239.8 EB05 188.6 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy41295.2
211.9–411.3ROR 296.2 · χ² 9,975 / p <1e-300
224.9 EB05 172.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=41 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchial wall thickening98266.1
215.1–329.0ROR 268.2 · χ² 22,108 / p <1e-300
220.0 EB05 185.8 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=98 · ♀ 6% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal oedema237259.4
226.5–297.1ROR 264.4 · χ² 52,614 / p <1e-300
220.8 EB05 198.2 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=237 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Endometrial ablation45247.5
181.1–338.3ROR 248.4 · χ² 9,415 / p <1e-300
197.8 EB05 153.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy47243.4
179.3–330.3ROR 244.3 · χ² 9,697 / p <1e-300
195.8 EB05 153.2 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Vital capacity decreased45188.8
138.8–256.7ROR 189.4 · χ² 7,386 / p <1e-300
158.5 EB05 123.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45not reported in cached trials
Right ventricular hypertrophy88182.1
146.2–226.7ROR 183.4 · χ² 14,132 / p <1e-300
158.7 EB05 132.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Airway peak pressure increased14172.7
99.7–299.3ROR 172.9 · χ² 2,014 / p <1e-300
129.5 EB05 82.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Intubation22162.6
105.0–251.8ROR 162.9 · χ² 3,076 / p <1e-300
131.6 EB05 91.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22not reported in cached trials
Reversible airways obstruction41147.3
107.1–202.6ROR 147.8 · χ² 5,343 / p <1e-300
127.6 EB05 98.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%) · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bronchial secretion retention97141.4
115.0–173.8ROR 142.5 · χ² 12,342 / p <1e-300
127.3 EB05 107.4 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=97 · ♀ 6% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Oligoarthritis15141.4
83.5–239.4ROR 141.6 · χ² 1,801 / p <1e-300
112.2 EB05 72.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage 013131.4
74.7–231.0ROR 131.5 · χ² 1,441 / p <1e-300
103.8 EB05 64.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Chronic obstructive airways disease exacerbated25130.7
87.0–196.2ROR 130.9 · χ² 2,865 / p <1e-300
111.2 EB05 79.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=25 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Status asthmaticus33126.1
88.6–179.6ROR 126.5 · χ² 3,694 / p <1e-300
110.1 EB05 82.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32not reported in cached trials
Congenital hiatus hernia15123.4
73.0–208.3ROR 123.5 · χ² 1,584 / p <1e-300
100.6 EB05 64.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary function test abnormal90104.0
84.1–128.6ROR 104.8 · χ² 8,548 / p <1e-300
96.0 EB05 80.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=90 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Breast conserving surgery29102.2
70.3–148.6ROR 102.5 · χ² 2,645 / p <1e-300
90.8 EB05 66.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Aortic valve stenosis9898.6
80.5–120.8ROR 99.4 · χ² 8,849 / p <1e-300
91.5 EB05 77.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · ♀ 9% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Nikolsky's sign1098.1
51.9–185.6ROR 98.2 · χ² 819 / p 2e-180
79.2 EB05 46.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Trisomy 182093.5
59.6–146.6ROR 93.6 · χ² 1,647 / p <1e-300
81.9 EB05 56.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Rhonchi7191.8
72.4–116.6ROR 92.4 · χ² 5,963 / p <1e-300
85.2 EB05 69.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70not reported in cached trials
Oesophageal dilatation2185.9
55.4–133.2ROR 86.1 · χ² 1,597 / p <1e-300
76.3 EB05 52.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Theophylline as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,4407.4
7.1–7.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 13,732 / p <1e-300
7.3 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3not reported in cached trials
Asthma2,10032.5
31.2–33.8ROR 38.9 · χ² 63,135 / p <1e-300
31.9 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 30.3not reported in cached trials
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,4687.8
7.4–8.1ROR 8.7 · χ² 8,729 / p <1e-300
7.7 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6NCT01794780: 2/276 (0.7%) on Theophylline (serious AE)
Wheezing1,41841.8
39.7–43.9ROR 47.1 · χ² 55,165 / p <1e-300
40.8 EB05 39.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.2not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,2314.5
4.2–4.7ROR 4.9 · χ² 3,386 / p <1e-300
4.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5 · ♀ 84% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Cough1,1186.8
6.4–7.2ROR 7.4 · χ² 5,600 / p <1e-300
6.8 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)8253.2
3.0–3.4ROR 3.4 · χ² 1,268 / p 6e-278
3.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5 · ♀ 87% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8051.0
1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 1 / p 0.128
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials
Oedema77024.5
22.9–26.3ROR 26.1 · χ² 17,155 / p <1e-300
24.2 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.2 · ♀ 95% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Pain7652.1
2.0–2.3ROR 2.2 · χ² 463 / p 7e-103
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2 · ♀ 85% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Chest pain6866.3
5.9–6.8ROR 6.6 · χ² 3,075 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6 · ♀ 86% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Nausea6681.4
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
1.4 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)5051.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 5 / p 0.011
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Theophylline?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Theophylline are dyspnoea, asthma, pneumonia, wheezing, vomiting, cough. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Theophylline have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Theophylline has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Theophylline causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.