← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Timolol side effects: what 12,011 FDA adverse event reports show

Timolol · Betimol · 1,039 reaction terms · 34,760 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Betimol

openFDA label

Who reports

12,011 reports · 47% serious · 575 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Betimol ® is indicated in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Betimol ® (timolol ophthalmic solution), 0.25% and 0.5%, is a non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist for ophthalmic use.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 5Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 999 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Total lung capacity increased26183.5
122.5–274.8ROR 183.9 · χ² 4,100 / p <1e-300
148.1 EB05 106.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Conjunctival scar13168.3
95.2–297.4ROR 168.5 · χ² 1,820 / p <1e-300
125.6 EB05 78.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Treatment failure3,04867.3
65.2–69.5ROR 89.9 · χ² 192,330 / p <1e-300
64.8 EB05 62.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Hypotony of eye1564.9
38.8–108.6ROR 65.0 · χ² 849 / p 7e-187
58.2 EB05 37.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure decreased1964.6
40.9–102.2ROR 64.7 · χ² 1,087 / p 1e-238
58.8 EB05 39.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=9no trial data cached
Floppy iris syndrome1363.2
36.4–109.9ROR 63.3 · χ² 709 / p 2e-156
56.3 EB05 35.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Peak expiratory flow rate decreased1457.1
33.5–97.2ROR 57.2 · χ² 694 / p 3e-153
51.7 EB05 32.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14no trial data cached
Product dropper issue2454.2
36.1–81.3ROR 54.3 · χ² 1,163 / p 3e-255
50.6 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Lung diffusion test decreased1149.8
27.4–90.7ROR 49.9 · χ² 465 / p 2e-103
45.0 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Iris adhesions1449.7
29.2–84.5ROR 49.8 · χ² 603 / p 2e-133
45.5 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Choroidal effusion1942.5
27.0–66.9ROR 42.5 · χ² 711 / p 6e-157
40.0 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure test abnormal1640.4
24.6–66.3ROR 40.4 · χ² 563 / p 1e-124
37.9 EB05 24.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)28239.2
34.9–44.0ROR 40.1 · χ² 10,229 / p <1e-300
38.2 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 45.6no trial data cached
Forced vital capacity decreased1438.5
22.7–65.4ROR 38.5 · χ² 464 / p 3e-103
36.0 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Haemangioma congenital1037.3
19.9–69.7ROR 37.3 · χ² 311 / p 7e-70
34.3 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Choroidal detachment1135.3
19.5–64.2ROR 35.4 · χ² 327 / p 2e-73
32.8 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Reaction to preservatives1226.0
14.7–46.0ROR 26.0 · χ² 260 / p 7e-59
24.7 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Growth of eyelashes1124.4
13.5–44.3ROR 24.5 · χ² 221 / p 2e-50
23.1 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Punctate keratitis1122.0
12.2–39.9ROR 22.0 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45
20.8 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Cystoid macular oedema2321.8
14.5–32.9ROR 21.9 · χ² 431 / p 5e-96
21.2 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Glaucoma23521.5
19.0–24.5ROR 22.0 · χ² 4,530 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 25.7no trial data cached
Optic nerve injury1319.9
11.5–34.4ROR 19.9 · χ² 213 / p 2e-48
18.9 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Vitamin b12 decreased3219.6
13.9–27.8ROR 19.7 · χ² 541 / p 5e-120
19.2 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%)no trial data cached
Ocular hypertension2119.3
12.6–29.7ROR 19.4 · χ² 343 / p 7e-77
18.7 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=18no trial data cached
Conjunctival hyperaemia3919.3
14.1–26.4ROR 19.3 · χ² 651 / p 7e-144
18.9 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Angle closure glaucoma2718.6
12.7–27.1ROR 18.6 · χ² 427 / p 3e-95
18.1 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=26no trial data cached
Eyelid margin crusting2918.1
12.6–26.1ROR 18.2 · χ² 448 / p 1e-99
17.7 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Forced expiratory volume decreased2817.4
12.0–25.2ROR 17.4 · χ² 412 / p 6e-92
17.0 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Iridocyclitis2916.3
11.3–23.5ROR 16.4 · χ² 398 / p 6e-89
15.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28no trial data cached
Eye allergy1416.0
9.5–27.1ROR 16.0 · χ² 181 / p 2e-41
15.0 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Corneal opacity1012.9
6.9–24.1ROR 12.9 · χ² 98 / p 2e-23
10.9 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Ulcerative keratitis1912.2
7.8–19.2ROR 12.2 · χ² 184 / p 4e-42
11.2 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Product container issue5511.5
8.8–14.9ROR 11.5 · χ² 511 / p 2e-113
11.1 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11no trial data cached
Vitreous haemorrhage1811.4
7.2–18.1ROR 11.4 · χ² 159 / p 8e-37
10.3 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Eye irritation34310.8
9.7–12.0ROR 11.1 · χ² 3,030 / p <1e-300
10.7 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Treatment failure3,04867.3
65.2–69.5ROR 89.9 · χ² 192,330 / p <1e-300
64.8 EB05 62.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8061.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · χ² 4 / p 0.027
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Hypersensitivity (allergic reaction)4614.4
4.0–4.8ROR 4.5 · χ² 1,194 / p 7e-262
4.3 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Dizziness4111.4
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)4090.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 16 / p 3e-5
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4001.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 3 / p 0.050
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3661.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 5 / p 0.010
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Nausea3600.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 19 / p 6e-6
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Eye irritation34310.8
9.7–12.0ROR 11.1 · χ² 3,030 / p <1e-300
10.7 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Fall3251.7
1.5–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 96 / p 6e-23
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Headache3120.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 6 / p 0.007
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Eye pain2949.3
8.3–10.5ROR 9.5 · χ² 2,174 / p <1e-300
9.2 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)28239.2
34.9–44.0ROR 40.1 · χ² 10,229 / p <1e-300
38.2 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 45.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Timolol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Timolol are fatigue, hypersensitivity, dizziness, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Timolol have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Timolol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Timolol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.