← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Vancomycin side effects: what 57,457 FDA adverse event reports show

Vancomycin · 1,312 reaction terms · 214,225 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Glycopeptide Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

57,457 reports · 92% serious · 11,333 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Vancomycin Injection is a glycopeptide antibacterial indicated in adult and pediatric patients (1 month and older) for the treatment of: Septicemia ( 1.1 ) Infective Endocarditis ( 1.2 ) Skin and Skin Structure Infections ( 1.3 ) Bone Infections ( 1.4 .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Vancomycin Injection, USP, in single-dose flexible bags contain vancomycin as vancomycin hydrochloride. It is a tricyclic glycopeptide antibacterial drug derived from Amycolatopsis orientalis (formerly Nocardia orientalis ).

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

POTENTIAL RISK OF EXPOSURE TO EXCIPIENTS DURING THE FIRST OR SECOND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY If use of vancomycin is needed during the first or second trimester of pregnancy, use other available formulations of vancomycin.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 2Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 9Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,272 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vancomycin infusion reaction204472.7
383.6–582.4ROR 474.3 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
200.8 EB05 178.7 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=201 · ♀ 69% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Red man syndrome393289.8
253.8–330.9ROR 291.8 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
159.6 EB05 146.8 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=313not reported in cached trials
Linear iga disease592202.3
183.0–223.7ROR 204.4 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
129.2 EB05 120.7 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=586 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antibiotic level above therapeutic135186.5
151.5–229.5ROR 186.9 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
121.0 EB05 104.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=124 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Geotrichum infection61147.0
109.2–198.0ROR 147.2 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
101.4 EB05 81.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Choroiditis6779.2
60.8–103.1ROR 79.2 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
63.9 EB05 52.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Trichosporon infection5558.8
44.2–78.2ROR 58.8 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
49.8 EB05 39.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinal vasculitis16056.8
48.1–67.1ROR 57.0 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
48.9 EB05 42.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=160 · ♀ 67% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disseminated mucormycosis5256.4
42.1–75.6ROR 56.5 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
48.1 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rhinocerebral mucormycosis4251.0
36.9–70.4ROR 51.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.9 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fungal endocarditis3549.3
34.6–70.2ROR 49.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
42.5 EB05 32.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cardiac valve vegetation5143.2
32.3–57.8ROR 43.2 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.2 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Acinetobacter infection10940.8
33.5–49.7ROR 40.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
36.5 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=107 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fungaemia15740.7
34.5–47.9ROR 40.8 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
36.5 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=157 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bacterial disease carrier7139.3
30.8–50.3ROR 39.4 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
35.3 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=71 · ♀ 100% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Enterococcus test positive6338.9
30.0–50.5ROR 39.0 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
34.9 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=62not reported in cached trials
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms2,38637.5
36.0–39.1ROR 39.1 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
34.1 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.2 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dysbiosis7236.0
28.2–45.8ROR 36.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.5 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72 · ♀ 73% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Stenotrophomonas infection11734.9
28.8–42.2ROR 34.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.7 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=117 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Systemic candida21234.2
29.7–39.4ROR 34.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.3 EB05 27.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=212 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Septic embolus6832.3
25.2–41.5ROR 32.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.5 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=68 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sepsis syndrome4031.3
22.7–43.2ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fusarium infection5431.2
23.7–41.2ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
28.6 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54not reported in cached trials
Enterococcal infection37630.7
27.6–34.1ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.3 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=373 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nephropathy toxic81828.9
26.9–31.0ROR 29.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.8 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.6 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Clostridium test positive16028.8
24.5–33.9ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 23.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=158not reported in cached trials
Corynebacterium infection3626.4
18.8–37.0ROR 26.4 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
24.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rash morbilliform18626.2
22.6–30.4ROR 26.3 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.4 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=184 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Enterococcal sepsis5425.8
19.6–34.0ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
24.0 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=54 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pseudomembranous colitis14525.2
21.3–29.8ROR 25.2 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.5 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=145 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pseudomonal bacteraemia5324.6
18.6–32.4ROR 24.6 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
22.9 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=53 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Megacolon9824.3
19.8–29.8ROR 24.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
22.8 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Enterococcal bacteraemia6624.3
18.9–31.2ROR 24.3 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
22.7 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=64not reported in cached trials
Clostridium difficile colitis66224.2
22.4–26.2ROR 24.5 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.7 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 14.0not reported in cached trials
Staphylococcal bacteraemia26924.1
21.3–27.3ROR 24.2 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=268not reported in cached trials
Crystal nephropathy3623.8
17.0–33.4ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.2 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pneumonia necrotising3923.5
17.0–32.5ROR 23.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.9 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Vancomycin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)6,4431.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.882
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)4,34410.7
10.4–11.0ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
10.4 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.5 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)4,2341.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.857
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms2,38637.5
36.0–39.1ROR 39.1 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
34.1 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.2 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Renal failure (kidney failure)2,2286.2
5.9–6.4ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.128
6.1 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 3.8not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)2,1011.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.440
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials
Sepsis (blood infection)2,0937.0
6.7–7.3ROR 7.2 · calibrated p 0.092
6.8 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3not reported in cached trials
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,9432.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.930
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials
Hypotension (low blood pressure)1,9223.5
3.4–3.7ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.458
3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated1,9062.3
2.2–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.876
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rash1,8641.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.700
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,6401.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.346
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Septic shock1,61314.1
13.4–14.8ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.6 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 8.4 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nausea1,5760.7
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.141
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.8not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Vancomycin ↔ Acute kidney injury.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Vancomycin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Vancomycin are acute kidney injury, pyrexia, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, renal failure, diarrhoea, sepsis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Vancomycin have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: POTENTIAL RISK OF EXPOSURE TO EXCIPIENTS DURING THE FIRST OR SECOND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY If use of vancomycin is needed during the first or second trimester of pregnancy, use other available formulations of vancomycin.

Do FAERS signals prove that Vancomycin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.