← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Expected pharmacological effect

Docetaxel (taxanes) and Alopecia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=16,970 co-reports · PRR 29.5 · ROR 39.1
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Expected pharmacological effect

Docetaxel (taxanes) ↔ Alopecia

n=16,970 co-reports · PRR 29.5 · ROR 39.1

Reporting over time (stimulated-reporting check)

2004: 1 reports (0.32% of the drug's reports)2005: 10 reports (2.38% of the drug's reports)2006: 1 reports (0.27% of the drug's reports)2007: 3 reports (0.68% of the drug's reports)2008: 1 reports (0.16% of the drug's reports)2009: 4 reports (0.46% of the drug's reports)2010: 9 reports (0.95% of the drug's reports)2011: 12 reports (0.87% of the drug's reports)2012: 18 reports (1.01% of the drug's reports)2013: 36 reports (2.18% of the drug's reports)2014: 17 reports (1.08% of the drug's reports)2015: 56 reports (2.78% of the drug's reports)2016: 136 reports (5.96% of the drug's reports)2017: 2,470 reports (51.33% of the drug's reports)2018: 7,608 reports (70.10% of the drug's reports)2019: 3,855 reports (49.89% of the drug's reports)2020: 1,806 reports (32.03% of the drug's reports)2021: 411 reports (9.07% of the drug's reports)2022: 170 reports (4.11% of the drug's reports)2023: 121 reports (2.93% of the drug's reports)2024: 118 reports (2.56% of the drug's reports)2025: 72 reports (1.74% of the drug's reports)05081114172023

Reporting spiked in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 — 68% of all 16,935 reports arrived in two years (2018–2019). A burst like this usually follows a regulatory communication, media coverage or litigation advertising rather than a change in the drug's effect; it inflates disproportionality for those years.

Bars: reports per year as a share of all FAERS reports for this drug, 2004–2025; amber = spike year (>3× the median share, ≥50 reports). Source: openFDA count=receivedate, retrieved 2026-10-09.

Docetaxel is a taxane chemotherapy, and hair loss is a near-universal, mechanistically direct consequence of its action on rapidly dividing cells — including the hair-follicle matrix. In a randomized trial, alopecia was recorded in roughly a third of patients on docetaxel versus under 2% on pembrolizumab, a striking and entirely expected difference. Alopecia is not merely cosmetic; it is among the most distressing chemotherapy side effects, and its severity is dose- and schedule-dependent.

Regulatory basis: docetaxel prescribing information (alopecia among the most common adverse reactions); confirmed by a randomized comparator arm (trial data below). A class effect of the taxanes and most cytotoxic chemotherapies.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHair loss begins weeks after the first cycle, after exposure
StrengthmetPRR 30, and ~36% incidence in a randomized comparator arm
ConsistencymetReproduced in every taxane trial and cohort
SpecificitypartialA class effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy, not molecule-unique
Biological gradientpartialSeverity varies with dose, schedule, and agent
PlausibilitymetDirect cytotoxicity to rapidly dividing follicle cells — named mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the drug's antimitotic action
ExperimentmetHair regrows after treatment stops — a clean dechallenge/rechallenge
AnalogymetShared with other taxanes and anthracyclines

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✓ Trial evidence found — docetaxel vs pembrolizumab in NSCLC (NCT01905657, KEYNOTE-010)

Term (as recorded)Docetaxel (n=309)Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (n=339)Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (n=343)
Alopecia (other events)11065

About 36% of docetaxel patients had alopecia recorded versus ~1.5–1.8% on pembrolizumab — a large, randomized, textbook-consistent contrast that directly confirms the expected effect. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →