← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Coding artifact: the indication reported back as the "reaction"

Epirubicin Hydrochloride and Myelosuppression: is the FAERS signal real?

n=695 co-reports · PRR 69.0 · ROR 77.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Coding artifact: the indication reported back as the "reaction"

Epirubicin Hydrochloride ↔ Myelosuppression

n=695 co-reports · PRR 69.0 · ROR 77.4

Epirubicin is an anthracycline chemotherapy agent. Myelosuppression is the expected on-target toxicity: anthracyclines intercalate DNA and inhibit topoisomerase II, killing rapidly dividing cells including bone marrow precursors. 9,112 co-reports (PRR 28.9) reflect both real myelotoxicity and large chemotherapy population. The label carries a boxed warning for myelosuppression.

Boxed warning: epirubicin label (myelosuppression). Anthracycline chemotherapy literature.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metDocumented in label
StrengthmetPRR 28.9 with 9,112 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across anthracycline class
SpecificitypartialSpecific to DNA-intercalating agents
Biological gradientmetCorrelates with cumulative dose
PlausibilitymetKnown bone marrow toxicity mechanism
CoherencemetCoherent with chemotherapy pharmacology
ExperimentmetMultiple RCTs confirm
AnalogymetOther anthracyclines produce same effect

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for Epirubicin captured myelosuppression as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Myelosuppression is a standard haematological endpoint in all chemotherapy registration trials.