← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Expected pharmacological effect

Hydroxyurea and Febrile neutropenia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=426 co-reports · PRR 6.5 · ROR 6.6
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Expected pharmacological effect

Hydroxyurea ↔ Febrile neutropenia

n=426 co-reports · PRR 6.5 · ROR 6.6

Hydroxyurea suppresses the marrow and can cause neutropenia with fever, which is dose-limiting in some regimens; 426 co-reports give PRR 6.5. The label advises regular blood-count monitoring and interruption for marked cytopenia.

Regulatory basis: hydroxyurea prescribing information — myelosuppression; blood-count monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWeeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 6.5 with 426 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across cohorts
Specificitynot establishedNeutropenic fever has many causes
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown ribonucleotide-reductase inhibition
CoherencemetFits hydroxyurea myelosuppression
Experimentn/aOften coded in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antimetabolite cytopenias

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — A Phase 1/2 Study of CPI-0610 With and Without Ruxolitinib in Patients With Hematologic and Myeloproliferative Malignancies (NCT02158858)

Adverse eventPhase 1 (24 mg Capsule PO Daily) (n=3) · Phase 1 (48 mg Capsule PO Daily) (n=5) · Phase 1 (120 mg Capsule PO Daily) (n=5) · Phase 1 (170 mg Capsule PO Daily) (n=3)
Febrile neutropenia1/32/51/50/3

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →