← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Coding artifact: the indication reported back as the "reaction"

Tocilizumab and Rheumatoid Arthritis: is the FAERS signal real?

n=22,731 co-reports · PRR 46.4 · ROR 57.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Coding artifact: the indication reported back as the "reaction"

Tocilizumab ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis

n=22,731 co-reports · PRR 46.4 · ROR 57.8

Cannabis (medical) is used for various indications. Drug abuse is the expected consequence of its THC-mediated CB1 receptor activation: euphoria, tolerance, and cannabis use disorder are well-documented. 3,569 co-reports (PRR 15.0) reflect both medical and recreational use. The label carries a boxed warning for abuse, dependence, and misuse.

Boxed warning: cannabis label (abuse/dependence/misuse). DEA scheduling (Schedule I).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metDocumented in label
StrengthmetPRR 15.0 with 3,569 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across CB1 agonists
SpecificitypartialSpecific to cannabinoid receptor activation
Biological gradientmetTolerance documented
PlausibilitymetKnown CB1 mechanism
CoherencemetCannabis withdrawal recognised
Experimentn/aNot an RCT endpoint
AnalogymetOther cannabinoids class-wide

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for Tocilizumab captured rheumatoid arthritis as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Medical cannabis trials are short-term; abuse liability assessed in epidemiological studies.