← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Dalfampridine side effects: what 71,315 FDA adverse event reports show

Dalfampridine · 1,182 reaction terms · 229,939 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Potassium Channel Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

71,315 reports · 28% serious · 1,759 with death outcome · 74% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Dalfampridine extended-release tablets are indicated as a treatment to improve walking in adult patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This was demonstrated by an increase in walking speed . Dalfampridine is a potassium channel blocker indicated to improve walking in adult patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This was demonstrated by an increase in walking speed ( 1 , 14 ).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Dalfampridine is a potassium channel blocker, available in a 10 mg tablet strength.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 11Not in label — unassessed 15
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,142 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gait spastic123161.7
129.7–201.6ROR 161.9 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
102.4 EB05 88.1 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=102 · ♀ 28% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials
Needle fatigue8768.9
54.6–87.1ROR 69.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
55.2 EB05 46.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · ♀ 17% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials
Social problem68758.4
53.8–63.4ROR 59.0 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
48.7 EB05 45.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Jc virus test positive12449.9
41.3–60.4ROR 50.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
42.5 EB05 36.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=52 · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Peroneal nerve palsy64137.3
34.4–40.5ROR 37.6 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
33.1 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=279 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Upper motor neurone lesion2537.3
24.6–56.5ROR 37.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.4 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
T-lymphocyte count increased2137.0
23.5–58.3ROR 37.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
32.1 EB05 22.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cd8 lymphocytes decreased2235.9
23.1–56.0ROR 36.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
31.3 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Haemoglobin urine present2031.8
20.0–50.4ROR 31.8 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
28.0 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Cd4 lymphocytes increased2230.1
19.4–46.8ROR 30.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
26.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Walking aid user60229.3
27.0–31.9ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 25.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=219 · 89% consumernot reported in cached trials
Therapy cessation4,51028.4
27.6–29.3ROR 30.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 28.9 · 93% consumernot reported in cached trials
Urine leukocyte esterase positive6127.6
21.3–35.9ROR 27.7 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.1 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Orthosis user2427.3
18.0–41.5ROR 27.3 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
24.6 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
B-lymphocyte count decreased11026.1
21.5–31.7ROR 26.1 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=41not reported in cached trials
Urine analysis abnormal23224.5
21.4–28.0ROR 24.6 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=59not reported in cached trials
Wheelchair user33924.1
21.6–26.9ROR 24.2 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.3 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=230 · 88% consumernot reported in cached trials
Muscle spasticity87722.3
20.8–23.9ROR 22.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.8 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.4not reported in cached trials
Multiple sclerosis relapse4,77421.8
21.1–22.4ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
20.3 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 32.5 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sars-cov-2 antibody test negative3220.9
14.6–29.9ROR 20.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.3 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=23 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Jc polyomavirus test positive7720.5
16.3–25.9ROR 20.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.1 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=43not reported in cached trials
Multiple sclerosis3,12720.4
19.7–21.1ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.1 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 27.9 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Neurogenic bladder13219.5
16.3–23.2ROR 19.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
18.3 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97not reported in cached trials
Decreased vibratory sense2018.4
11.7–28.9ROR 18.4 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.9 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Gait disturbance10,97617.8
17.5–18.1ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
16.8 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.8 · 84% consumerNCT02271217: 1/126 (0.8%) on Dalfampridine (serious AE)
Balance disorder4,90017.6
17.1–18.1ROR 18.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.6 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.1 · 82% consumerNCT01328379: 2/142 (1.4%) on Dalfampridine; 6/143 (4.2%) control
T-lymphocyte count decreased3817.3
12.5–24.0ROR 17.3 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.2 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vitamin b12 increased4316.8
12.4–22.9ROR 16.9 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.8 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Central nervous system lesion72616.2
15.1–17.5ROR 16.4 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.4 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.7 · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bladder dysfunction5115.3
11.5–20.3ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.4 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33not reported in cached trials
Trigeminal neuralgia19715.1
13.1–17.4ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.4 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=112not reported in cached trials
Culture urine positive6814.8
11.6–18.9ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.0 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypertonic bladder13614.5
12.2–17.3ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.8 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=103 · ♀ 44% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials
Monoparesis8414.2
11.4–17.6ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.5 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=81 · ♀ 0% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Dalfampridine as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (2 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gait disturbance10,97617.8
17.5–18.1ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
16.8 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.8 · 84% consumerNCT02271217: 1/126 (0.8%) on Dalfampridine (serious AE)
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8,3091.9
1.8–1.9ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.930
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fall7,3356.6
6.5–6.8ROR 7.3 · calibrated p 0.089
6.5 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.2 · 81% consumerNCT01328379: 3/142 (2.1%) on Dalfampridine; 7/143 (4.9%) control
Balance disorder4,90017.6
17.1–18.1ROR 18.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.6 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.1 · 82% consumerNCT01328379: 2/142 (1.4%) on Dalfampridine; 6/143 (4.2%) control
Multiple sclerosis relapse4,77421.8
21.1–22.4ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
20.3 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 32.5 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Therapy cessation4,51028.4
27.6–29.3ROR 30.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 28.9 · 93% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dizziness3,9892.4
2.3–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.836
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2 · 79% consumerNCT01328379: 15/142 (10.6%) on Dalfampridine; 3/143 (2.1%) control
Urinary tract infection (bladder infection)3,7416.6
6.4–6.8ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.103
6.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.8NCT01328379: 14/142 (9.9%) on Dalfampridine; 8/143 (5.6%) control
Condition aggravated3,4843.4
3.3–3.5ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.474
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0 · 88% consumernot reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)3,4612.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.691
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2 · 79% consumerNCT02271217: 4/126 (3.2%) on Dalfampridine
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)3,3063.7
3.6–3.8ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.415
3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9 · 80% consumerNCT01328379: 11/142 (7.7%) on Dalfampridine; 6/143 (4.2%) control
Headache3,2661.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.682
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7 · 80% consumerNCT01328379: 18/142 (12.7%) on Dalfampridine; 16/143 (11.2%) control
Multiple sclerosis3,12720.4
19.7–21.1ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.1 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 27.9 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Mobility decreased2,99812.8
12.4–13.3ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
12.3 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5 · 86% consumernot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Dalfampridine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Dalfampridine are gait disturbance, fall, fatigue, balance disorder, multiple sclerosis relapse, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Dalfampridine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Dalfampridine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Dalfampridine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.