← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Elexacaftor and Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor side effects: what 12,353 FDA adverse event reports show

Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor, And Ivacaftor · 998 reaction terms · 31,427 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Combination of ivacaftor, a cftr potentiator, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor, And Ivacaftor (Trikafta)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

12,353 reports · 42% serious · 241 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

TRIKAFTA is indicated for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) in adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older who have a clinical diagnosis of CF and who have at least one variant in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator ( CF.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

TRIKAFTA is a co-package of elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor fixed-dose combination tablets or granules and ivacaftor tablets or granules. Both tablets and granules are for oral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY AND LIVER FAILURE TRIKAFTA can cause serious and potentially fatal drug-induced liver injury. Cases of liver failure leading to transplantation and death have been reported in patients with and without a history of liver disease taking TRIKAFTA, in both clinical trials and the postmarketing setting [see Adverse Reactions (6) ].

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 28
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 958 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cystic fibrosis related diabetes601,205.7
865.4–1,679.9ROR 1,211.6 · χ² 41,223 / p <1e-300
571.8 EB05 460.3 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=30no trial data cached
Sweat test abnormal16567.8
322.1–1,001.0ROR 568.5 · χ² 6,337 / p <1e-300
281.4 EB05 183.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4no trial data cached
Vitamin a increased11470.4
241.0–918.3ROR 470.9 · χ² 3,661 / p <1e-300
224.5 EB05 133.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=7no trial data cached
Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome51298.5
221.7–401.9ROR 299.7 · χ² 12,574 / p <1e-300
231.4 EB05 182.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42no trial data cached
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis812294.4
273.8–316.5ROR 314.9 · χ² 201,588 / p <1e-300
248.9 EB05 234.8 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=624no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis502167.8
153.4–183.6ROR 174.9 · χ² 75,506 / p <1e-300
151.7 EB05 140.9 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=478 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Pulmonary function test decreased21687.3
76.2–100.0ROR 88.8 · χ² 17,431 / p <1e-300
82.4 EB05 73.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=119no trial data cached
Increased viscosity of bronchial secretion3084.2
58.4–121.5ROR 84.4 · χ² 2,270 / p <1e-300
76.5 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Body dysmorphic disorder1781.0
49.8–131.8ROR 81.1 · χ² 1,206 / p 2e-264
71.4 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Sputum increased9276.9
62.4–94.7ROR 77.4 · χ² 6,515 / p <1e-300
72.5 EB05 60.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Defiant behaviour1269.5
39.0–123.8ROR 69.6 · χ² 713 / p 2e-157
60.6 EB05 37.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Pseudomonas test positive2552.8
35.5–78.7ROR 53.0 · χ² 1,183 / p 2e-259
49.4 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Lung transplant rejection1539.0
23.4–65.0ROR 39.0 · χ² 506 / p 3e-112
36.5 EB05 23.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Morning sickness1238.3
21.6–67.9ROR 38.4 · χ² 391 / p 3e-87
35.6 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Paranasal sinus hypersecretion7533.6
26.8–42.2ROR 33.8 · χ² 2,297 / p <1e-300
32.7 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Hordeolum7731.5
25.1–39.4ROR 31.7 · χ² 2,201 / p <1e-300
30.7 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 81% (drug 58%)no trial data cached
Pancreatic failure3131.2
21.9–44.5ROR 31.3 · χ² 861 / p 2e-189
30.2 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder7531.1
–ROR 31.3 · χ² –
–Not in label — unassessedserious n=28no trial data cached
Behaviour disorder9129.5
24.0–36.3ROR 29.7 · χ² 2,434 / p <1e-300
28.8 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25no trial data cached
Bronchial secretion retention2128.5
18.6–43.9ROR 28.6 · χ² 522 / p 7e-116
27.5 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Intensive care2328.3
18.8–42.8ROR 28.4 · χ² 570 / p 3e-126
27.3 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Weight gain poor3828.2
20.5–38.9ROR 28.3 · χ² 955 / p 5e-210
27.4 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Mycobacterium abscessus infection1126.8
14.8–48.6ROR 26.8 · χ² 244 / p 3e-55
25.2 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Increased bronchial secretion3926.1
19.0–35.8ROR 26.2 · χ² 902 / p 2e-198
25.4 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Brain fog21325.0
21.9–28.6ROR 25.5 · χ² 4,824 / p <1e-300
24.6 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.0no trial data cached
Sinus operation3424.5
17.5–34.4ROR 24.6 · χ² 733 / p 9e-162
23.9 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=32no trial data cached
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic1324.3
14.1–42.0ROR 24.3 · χ² 264 / p 1e-59
23.1 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased1024.0
12.9–44.9ROR 24.1 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44
22.5 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=3no trial data cached
Pneumonia pseudomonal2123.7
15.4–36.4ROR 23.7 · χ² 428 / p 3e-95
22.9 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Forced expiratory volume decreased3822.9
16.7–31.6ROR 23.0 · χ² 765 / p 9e-169
22.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23no trial data cached
Testicular pain4222.7
16.8–30.8ROR 22.8 · χ² 839 / p 9e-185
22.2 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)no trial data cached
Nasal inflammation1422.7
13.4–38.5ROR 22.7 · χ² 266 / p 5e-60
21.7 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Steatorrhoea3421.7
15.5–30.5ROR 21.8 · χ² 644 / p 2e-142
21.2 EB05 15.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Lung transplant4521.6
16.1–29.0ROR 21.7 · χ² 853 / p 8e-188
21.2 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45no trial data cached
Sputum retention1221.0
11.9–37.1ROR 21.0 · χ² 206 / p 4e-47
19.9 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Pseudomonas infection9719.6
16.1–23.9ROR 19.7 · χ² 1,674 / p <1e-300
19.3 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.9 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Productive cough (cough with phlegm)53519.3
17.8–21.0ROR 20.1 · χ² 9,192 / p <1e-300
19.1 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Emergency care3319.0
13.5–26.7ROR 19.0 · χ² 538 / p 3e-119
18.6 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis812294.4
273.8–316.5ROR 314.9 · χ² 201,588 / p <1e-300
248.9 EB05 234.8 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=624no trial data cached
Headache7672.1
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 437 / p 2e-97
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Anxiety6143.6
3.4–3.9ROR 3.8 · χ² 1,190 / p 5e-261
3.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Cough5943.6
3.3–3.9ROR 3.7 · χ² 1,123 / p 2e-246
3.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Rash5692.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.3 · χ² 388 / p 1e-86
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)5371.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 13 / p 1e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Productive cough (cough with phlegm)53519.3
17.8–21.0ROR 20.1 · χ² 9,192 / p <1e-300
19.1 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Weight increased (weight gain)5113.9
3.6–4.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 1,101 / p 8e-242
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Cystic fibrosis502167.8
153.4–183.6ROR 174.9 · χ² 75,506 / p <1e-300
151.7 EB05 140.9 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=478 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal pain upper4743.9
3.6–4.3ROR 4.0 · χ² 1,031 / p 2e-226
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Depression4513.3
3.1–3.7ROR 3.4 · χ² 745 / p 3e-164
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Hospitalisation4324.8
4.4–5.3ROR 4.9 · χ² 1,304 / p 8e-286
4.8 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3851.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.414
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Elexacaftor and Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Elexacaftor and Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor are infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis, headache, anxiety, cough, rash, fatigue. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Elexacaftor and Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY AND LIVER FAILURE TRIKAFTA can cause serious and potentially fatal drug-induced liver injury. Cases of liver failure leading to transplantation and death have been reported in patients with and without a history of liver disease taking TRIKAFTA, in both clinical trials and the postmarketing setting [see Adverse Reactions (6) ].

Do FAERS signals prove that Elexacaftor and Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.