← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Estradiol Transdermal side effects: what 44,854 FDA adverse event reports show

Estradiol Transdermal · Estradiol · 1,187 reaction terms · 167,009 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Estrogen

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Estradiol

openFDA label

Who reports

44,854 reports · 49% serious · 886 with death outcome · 98% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Estradiol gel, 0.1% is an estrogen indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause (1.1) . 1.1 Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms due to Menopause

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Estradiol gel 0.1%, is a clear, colorless gel, which is odorless when dry. It is designed to deliver sustained circulating concentrations of estradiol, USP when applied once daily to the skin. The gel is applied to a small area (200 cm 2 ) of the thigh in a thin layer.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH UNOPPOSED ESTROGEN IN WOMEN WITH A UTERUS There is an increased risk of endometrial cancer in a woman with a uterus who uses unopposed estrogens. Adding a progestogen to estrogen-only therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia, which may be a precursor to endometrial cancer.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,147 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Salpingo-oophorectomy unilateral42288.0
195.8–423.5ROR 288.2 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
164.3 EB05 126.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.5–15.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Adhesive tape use83135.7
106.2–173.3ROR 135.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
102.6 EB05 85.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (7.4–13.5)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Dermal absorption impaired3976.6
54.6–107.4ROR 76.6 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
63.8 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.4–15.5)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Blood oestrogen decreased7860.3
47.6–76.4ROR 60.4 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
52.8 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 6.6 (5.0–8.8)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=27 · 71% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Sinus rhythm4249.3
35.9–67.8ROR 49.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.8 EB05 33.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (3.4–7.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Schizoaffective disorder15243.2
36.6–50.9ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
39.4 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.6 (3.8–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=152no trial arm names this drug
Product ineffective5842.6
32.6–55.8ROR 42.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.6 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.9–14.3)
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal injury4642.2
31.2–57.0ROR 42.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
38.2 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.6–15.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Blood oestrogen increased4741.1
30.5–55.4ROR 41.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
37.3 EB05 29.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 8.8 (6.0–13.1)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=22no trial arm names this drug
Device adhesion issue1,16138.5
36.3–40.9ROR 39.5 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
35.6 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 5.0 (4.7–5.3)
Reporting / coding artifact94% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Sinusitis fungal4729.5
22.0–39.7ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.5 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.7–14.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Oestrogen receptor assay positive6728.9
22.6–37.0ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.1 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.6 (0.5–0.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=67no trial arm names this drug
Progesterone receptor assay positive5126.6
20.0–35.2ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.0 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=51no trial arm names this drug
Product design issue3626.0
18.6–36.4ROR 26.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
24.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.3–15.8)
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Postmenopausal haemorrhage11922.5
18.7–27.1ROR 22.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.5 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.7 (3.8–5.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=100 · 74% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product adhesion issue1,46820.1
19.1–21.2ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.3 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (4.6–5.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=88 · 72% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Epidermal necrosis3818.7
13.6–25.9ROR 18.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.4–15.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Breast cancer in situ4818.0
13.5–24.1ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.3 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47no trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal discomfort16418.0
15.4–21.0ROR 18.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.3 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.5 (3.0–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 86% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product packaging issue34017.7
15.9–19.7ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.1 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.7 (4.2–5.4)
Reporting / coding artifact79% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Exposure via direct contact3517.7
12.6–24.8ROR 17.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.9 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.2–15.9)
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Atrophic vulvovaginitis2516.5
11.1–24.7ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.7 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 2.2 (1.4–3.4)
Not in label — unassessed–no trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal dryness11016.5
13.6–19.9ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (2.5–3.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · 70% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Periorbital pain2716.2
11.0–23.8ROR 16.2 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
15.4 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (5.8–17.0)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal burning sensation20316.0
14.0–18.4ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.5 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (2.7–3.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 89% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Retinal pigmentation2615.8
10.7–23.3ROR 15.8 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.9 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (5.8–17.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26no trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal erythema2715.6
10.7–23.0ROR 15.6 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.8 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.5 (2.3–5.5)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Dry age-related macular degeneration3515.2
10.9–21.3ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.5 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.2–15.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35no trial arm names this drug
Female genital tract fistula5415.1
11.5–19.8ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.5 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.8–14.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54no trial arm names this drug
Incorrect dose administered by product4514.2
10.6–19.1ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.6 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.6–15.1)
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial arm names this drug
Butterfly rash2913.9
9.6–20.1ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.1 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.0–16.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome5912.0
9.3–15.6ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (7.0–14.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Application site rash33111.4
10.3–12.8ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
11.1 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.8 (4.2–5.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=30 · 78% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Vulvovaginal swelling4311.3
8.3–15.3ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓
10.6 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.1 (2.9–5.8)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Sputum increased5011.3
8.5–14.9ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓
10.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.7–14.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hormone level abnormal10810.7
8.8–12.9ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.3 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.5 (3.6–5.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=46no trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Estradiol Transdermal only as a background or rescue medication (NCT02158572, NCT01181479); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,6651.3
1.3–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.525
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.3)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3no trial arm names this drug
Nausea2,7771.6
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.761
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial arm names this drug
Headache2,7542.1
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.989
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)2,7511.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.767
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.4 (3.2–3.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1no trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,3181.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.481
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.1–3.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Pain2,0081.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.673
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial arm names this drug
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,8891.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.567
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.4 (3.2–3.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6no trial arm names this drug
Dizziness1,6471.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.685
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial arm names this drug
Arthralgia (joint pain)1,5871.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.841
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3no trial arm names this drug
Pruritus (itching)1,4781.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.863
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.6 (3.4–3.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial arm names this drug
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,4751.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.457
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Rash1,4691.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.708
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.7 (3.5–3.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial arm names this drug
Product adhesion issue1,46820.1
19.1–21.2ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.3 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (4.6–5.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=88 · 72% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Vomiting1,3111.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.518
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.1–3.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol ↔ Pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Estradiol Transdermal?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Estradiol Transdermal are nausea, headache, fatigue, pain, diarrhoea, breast cancer female. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Estradiol Transdermal have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH UNOPPOSED ESTROGEN IN WOMEN WITH A UTERUS There is an increased risk of endometrial cancer in a woman with a uterus who uses unopposed estrogens. Adding a progestogen to estrogen-only therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia, which may be a precursor to endometrial cancer.

Do FAERS signals prove that Estradiol Transdermal causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.