Estradiol Transdermal side effects: what 44,854 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Estradiol
Who reports
44,854 reports · 49% serious · 886 with death outcome · 98% female
Used for
Estradiol gel, 0.1% is an estrogen indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause (1.1) . 1.1 Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms due to Menopause
What it is
Estradiol gel 0.1%, is a clear, colorless gel, which is odorless when dry. It is designed to deliver sustained circulating concentrations of estradiol, USP when applied once daily to the skin. The gel is applied to a small area (200 cm 2 ) of the thigh in a thin layer.
Boxed warning
ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH UNOPPOSED ESTROGEN IN WOMEN WITH A UTERUS There is an increased risk of endometrial cancer in a woman with a uterus who uses unopposed estrogens. Adding a progestogen to estrogen-only therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia, which may be a precursor to endometrial cancer.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,147 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salpingo-oophorectomy unilateral | 42 | 288.0 195.8–423.5ROR 288.2 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓ | 164.3 EB05 126.6 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.5–15.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=42 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Adhesive tape use | 83 | 135.7 106.2–173.3ROR 135.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 102.6 EB05 85.3 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (7.4–13.5) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dermal absorption impaired | 39 | 76.6 54.6–107.4ROR 76.6 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 63.8 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.4–15.5) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood oestrogen decreased | 78 | 60.3 47.6–76.4ROR 60.4 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓ | 52.8 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 6.6 (5.0–8.8) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=27 · 71% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Menopausal symptoms | 234 | 53.3 46.5–61.0ROR 53.5 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓ | 47.7 EB05 42.8 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 7.5 (6.3–8.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=143 · 73% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sinus rhythm | 42 | 49.3 35.9–67.8ROR 49.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 43.8 EB05 33.8 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (3.4–7.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=42 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Schizoaffective disorder | 152 | 43.2 36.6–50.9ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 39.4 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.6 (3.8–5.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=152 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product ineffective | 58 | 42.6 32.6–55.8ROR 42.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 38.6 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.9–14.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal injury | 46 | 42.2 31.2–57.0ROR 42.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 38.2 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.6–15.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=39 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood oestrogen increased | 47 | 41.1 30.5–55.4ROR 41.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 37.3 EB05 29.2 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 8.8 (6.0–13.1) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=22 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device adhesion issue | 1,161 | 38.5 36.3–40.9ROR 39.5 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 35.6 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 5.0 (4.7–5.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | 94% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Breast cancer female | 1,709 | 31.6 30.1–33.2ROR 32.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 29.6 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 34.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sinusitis fungal | 47 | 29.5 22.0–39.7ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 27.5 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.7–14.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=47 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oestrogen receptor assay positive | 67 | 28.9 22.6–37.0ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 27.1 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=67 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Circumstance or information capable of leading to device use error | 135 | 28.4 23.8–33.7ROR 28.4 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 26.7 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (7.9–12.7) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Progesterone receptor assay positive | 51 | 26.6 20.0–35.2ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 25.0 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=51 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product design issue | 36 | 26.0 18.6–36.4ROR 26.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓ | 24.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.3–15.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Postmenopausal haemorrhage | 119 | 22.5 18.7–27.1ROR 22.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.5 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.7 (3.8–5.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=100 · 74% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product adhesion issue | 1,468 | 20.1 19.1–21.2ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.3 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (4.6–5.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=88 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Epidermal necrosis | 38 | 18.7 13.6–25.9ROR 18.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.4–15.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Breast cancer in situ | 48 | 18.0 13.5–24.1ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.3 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=47 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal discomfort | 164 | 18.0 15.4–21.0ROR 18.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.3 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.5 (3.0–4.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=30 · 86% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product packaging issue | 340 | 17.7 15.9–19.7ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.1 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.7 (4.2–5.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | 79% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Exposure via direct contact | 35 | 17.7 12.6–24.8ROR 17.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.9 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.2–15.9) | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site hypersensitivity | 42 | 16.8 12.3–22.8ROR 16.8 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.1 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.5–15.3) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Atrophic vulvovaginitis | 25 | 16.5 11.1–24.7ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓ | 15.7 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 2.2 (1.4–3.4) | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal dryness | 110 | 16.5 13.6–19.9ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 15.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (2.5–3.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=43 · 70% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Periorbital pain | 27 | 16.2 11.0–23.8ROR 16.2 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 15.4 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (5.8–17.0) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal burning sensation | 203 | 16.0 14.0–18.4ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 15.5 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (2.7–3.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=22 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Retinal pigmentation | 26 | 15.8 10.7–23.3ROR 15.8 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.9 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (5.8–17.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=26 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal erythema | 27 | 15.6 10.7–23.0ROR 15.6 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.8 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.5 (2.3–5.5) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dry age-related macular degeneration | 35 | 15.2 10.9–21.3ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.5 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.2–15.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Female genital tract fistula | 54 | 15.1 11.5–19.8ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.5 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.8–14.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=54 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Incorrect dose administered by product | 45 | 14.2 10.6–19.1ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 13.6 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.6–15.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Butterfly rash | 29 | 13.9 9.6–20.1ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 13.1 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.0–16.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=28 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome | 59 | 12.0 9.3–15.6ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓ | 11.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (7.0–14.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=58 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Application site rash | 331 | 11.4 10.3–12.8ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 11.1 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.8 (4.2–5.5) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=30 · 78% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal swelling | 43 | 11.3 8.3–15.3ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓ | 10.6 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.1 (2.9–5.8) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sputum increased | 50 | 11.3 8.5–14.9ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓ | 10.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 10.0 (6.7–14.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=49 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hormone level abnormal | 108 | 10.7 8.8–12.9ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓ | 10.3 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.5 (3.6–5.7) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=46 | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 3,665 | 1.3 1.3–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.525 | 1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 2,777 | 1.6 1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.761 | 1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 2,754 | 2.1 2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.989 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 2,751 | 1.7 1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.767 | 1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.4 (3.2–3.5) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 2,318 | 1.2 1.2–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.481 | 1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.1–3.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 2,008 | 1.5 1.5–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.673 | 1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.2) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 1,889 | 1.4 1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.567 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.4 (3.2–3.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Breast cancer female | 1,709 | 31.6 30.1–33.2ROR 32.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 29.6 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 34.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dizziness | 1,647 | 1.5 1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.685 | 1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 1,587 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.841 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pruritus (itching) | 1,478 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.863 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.6 (3.4–3.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 1,475 | 1.2 1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.457 | 1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rash | 1,469 | 1.6 1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.708 | 1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.7 (3.5–3.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product adhesion issue | 1,468 | 20.1 19.1–21.2ROR 20.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.3 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Estrogens: PRR 4.9 (4.6–5.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=88 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vomiting | 1,311 | 1.3 1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.518 | 1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3 vs other Estrogens: PRR 3.3 (3.1–3.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Salpingo-oophorectomy unilateral — n=42, PRR 288.0
- Adhesive tape use — n=83, PRR 135.7
- Dermal absorption impaired — n=39, PRR 76.6
- Sinus rhythm — n=42, PRR 49.3
- Schizoaffective disorder — n=152, PRR 43.2
- Vulvovaginal injury — n=46, PRR 42.2
- Sinusitis fungal — n=47, PRR 29.5
- Postmenopausal haemorrhage — n=119, PRR 22.5
- Epidermal necrosis — n=38, PRR 18.7
- Breast cancer in situ — n=48, PRR 18.0
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol ↔ Pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism).
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Estradiol Transdermal?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Estradiol Transdermal are nausea, headache, fatigue, pain, diarrhoea, breast cancer female. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Estradiol Transdermal have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH UNOPPOSED ESTROGEN IN WOMEN WITH A UTERUS There is an increased risk of endometrial cancer in a woman with a uterus who uses unopposed estrogens. Adding a progestogen to estrogen-only therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia, which may be a precursor to endometrial cancer.
Do FAERS signals prove that Estradiol Transdermal causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 9669a0e3-27e2-4f6c-961c-7a67e9f84cc8, effective 20260219; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"ESTRADIOL TRANSDERMAL") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,187 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
ESTRADIOL TRANSDERMAL, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.