← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol side effects: what 41,254 FDA adverse event reports show

Fluticasone Propionate And Salmeterol · 1,182 reaction terms · 137,657 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Inhaled corticosteroid (ics)

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Fluticasone Propionate (Flovent Diskus)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

41,254 reports · 40% serious · 2,032 with death outcome · 67% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

FLOVENT DISKUS is indicated for the maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in patients aged 4 years and older. Important Limitation of Use FLOVENT DISKUS is NOT indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm. FLOVENT DISKUS is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) indicated for: • Maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in patients aged 4 years and older.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

FLOVENT DISKUS inhalation powder is a dry powder inhaler for oral inhalation. The active component of FLOVENT DISKUS 50 mcg, FLOVENT DISKUS 100 mcg, and FLOVENT DISKUS 250 mcg is fluticasone p.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 13Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 13
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,142 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Inhalation therapy152158.4
132.0–190.1ROR 159.0 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
118.7 EB05 103.7 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=46 · 95% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Emergency care examination8572.6
57.9–91.2ROR 72.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
62.7 EB05 52.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=36 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Intentional underdose54040.4
37.1–44.1ROR 41.0 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
37.4 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=80 · 98% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Oxygen supplementation5136.9
27.8–49.1ROR 37.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.1 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · 82% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Lung lobectomy1828.9
18.0–46.5ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial arm names this drug
Lung operation4327.4
20.1–37.2ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.7 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=42 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Device use error1,46022.6
21.5–23.8ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
21.7 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=136 · 98% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Intercepted drug administration error1821.3
13.3–34.1ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
20.0 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial arm names this drug
Investigation12420.5
17.1–24.5ROR 20.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.7 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=122 · 92% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Peak expiratory flow rate decreased1720.2
12.4–32.8ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.9 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–no trial arm names this drug
Life support2018.6
11.9–29.1ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.6 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial arm names this drug
Product complaint87018.2
17.1–19.5ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.6 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=56 · 95% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Increased viscosity of bronchial secretion2218.2
11.9–27.9ROR 18.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.2 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial arm names this drug
Oropharyngeal candidiasis3118.0
12.6–25.7ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.2 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=22 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Wrong technique in device usage process1,50817.2
16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=107 · 98% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product confusion2416.1
10.7–24.2ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
15.2 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Device misuse3413.2
9.4–18.5ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Total lung capacity decreased4012.9
9.4–17.7ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
12.3 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · ♀ 44% (drug 67%) · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Increased upper airway secretion12312.3
10.3–14.7ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓
11.9 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · 79% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Inability to afford medication22812.0
10.5–13.7ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · 97% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product label confusion13211.7
9.9–13.9ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
11.4 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Sputum increased4811.7
8.8–15.6ROR 11.7 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓
11.2 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 87% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Dysphonia1,27711.3
10.7–11.9ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
11.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · 92% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Vocal cord disorder4211.0
8.1–14.9ROR 11.0 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.3 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Cataract operation12010.4
8.7–12.5ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
10.1 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=118 · 89% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Cancer surgery1910.2
6.5–16.1ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓
9.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Product quality issue2,66510.2
9.8–10.6ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.0 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7 · 93% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Asthma2,19910.1
9.7–10.5ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 11.3 · 78% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Wheezing1,1429.9
9.4–10.5ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
9.7 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.2 · 80% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Rehabilitation therapy749.9
7.8–12.4ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=66 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Emergency care569.7
7.4–12.6ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.039 ✓
9.2 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 89% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Expired product administered6199.6
8.9–10.4ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.4 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=129 · 97% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Bronchial hyperreactivity229.4
6.2–14.3ROR 9.4 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓
8.3 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21no trial arm names this drug
Osteosclerosis289.1
6.3–13.3ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.051
8.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

No completed trial with posted adverse-event results was found on ClinicalTrials.gov for Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol (searched FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)6,3925.8
5.6–5.9ROR 6.6 · calibrated p 0.114
5.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.1 · 86% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)4,9041.9
1.8–1.9ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.948
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9 · 89% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product quality issue2,66510.2
9.8–10.6ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.0 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7 · 93% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Cough2,5624.7
4.5–4.8ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.245
4.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.7 · 84% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Product dose omission issue2,4454.4
4.2–4.5ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.285
4.3 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 87% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Asthma2,19910.1
9.7–10.5ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 11.3 · 78% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Pneumonia (lung infection)2,1723.4
3.3–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.473
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.9 · 76% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Drug dose omission1,9986.1
5.8–6.4ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.129
6.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.6 · 94% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,5980.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.261
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7 · 87% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,5881.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.867
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 86% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Wrong technique in device usage process1,50817.2
16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=107 · 98% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Device use error1,46022.6
21.5–23.8ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
21.7 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=136 · 98% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Dysphonia1,27711.3
10.7–11.9ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
11.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · 92% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Underdose1,2488.8
8.3–9.3ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.046 ✓
8.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.7 · 97% consumerno trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Salmeterol Xinafoate ↔ Asthma.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol are dyspnoea, cough, asthma, pneumonia, malaise, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.