Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol side effects: what 41,254 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Inhaled corticosteroid (ics)
Label matched
Fluticasone Propionate (Flovent Diskus)
Who reports
41,254 reports · 40% serious · 2,032 with death outcome · 67% female
Used for
FLOVENT DISKUS is indicated for the maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in patients aged 4 years and older. Important Limitation of Use FLOVENT DISKUS is NOT indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm. FLOVENT DISKUS is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) indicated for: • Maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in patients aged 4 years and older.
What it is
FLOVENT DISKUS inhalation powder is a dry powder inhaler for oral inhalation. The active component of FLOVENT DISKUS 50 mcg, FLOVENT DISKUS 100 mcg, and FLOVENT DISKUS 250 mcg is fluticasone p.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,142 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhalation therapy | 152 | 158.4 132.0–190.1ROR 159.0 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 118.7 EB05 103.7 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=46 · 95% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Emergency care examination | 85 | 72.6 57.9–91.2ROR 72.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 62.7 EB05 52.3 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=36 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intentional underdose | 540 | 40.4 37.1–44.1ROR 41.0 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 37.4 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=80 · 98% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oxygen supplementation | 51 | 36.9 27.8–49.1ROR 37.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 34.1 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=51 · 82% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Lung lobectomy | 18 | 28.9 18.0–46.5ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 26.7 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Lung operation | 43 | 27.4 20.1–37.2ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 25.7 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=42 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device use error | 1,460 | 22.6 21.5–23.8ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓ | 21.7 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=136 · 98% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intercepted drug administration error | 18 | 21.3 13.3–34.1ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 20.0 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Investigation | 124 | 20.5 17.1–24.5ROR 20.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.7 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=122 · 92% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Peak expiratory flow rate decreased | 17 | 20.2 12.4–32.8ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.9 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Life support | 20 | 18.6 11.9–29.1ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.6 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product complaint | 870 | 18.2 17.1–19.5ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.6 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=56 · 95% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Increased viscosity of bronchial secretion | 22 | 18.2 11.9–27.9ROR 18.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.2 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Respiratory tract irritation | 36 | 18.1 13.0–25.2ROR 18.1 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.3 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=14 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oropharyngeal candidiasis | 31 | 18.0 12.6–25.7ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.2 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=22 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wrong technique in device usage process | 1,508 | 17.2 16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=107 · 98% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product confusion | 24 | 16.1 10.7–24.2ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 15.2 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1,354 | 13.5 12.8–14.2ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 13.1 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 18.1 · 77% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device misuse | 34 | 13.2 9.4–18.5ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 12.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Total lung capacity decreased | 40 | 12.9 9.4–17.7ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓ | 12.3 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=29 · ♀ 44% (drug 67%) · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Candida infection (yeast infection) | 402 | 12.5 11.3–13.8ROR 12.6 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 12.2 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.5 · 90% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Increased upper airway secretion | 123 | 12.3 10.3–14.7ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓ | 11.9 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=67 · 79% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Inability to afford medication | 228 | 12.0 10.5–13.7ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 11.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=62 · 97% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product label confusion | 132 | 11.7 9.9–13.9ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.4 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sputum increased | 48 | 11.7 8.8–15.6ROR 11.7 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓ | 11.2 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · 87% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dysphonia | 1,277 | 11.3 10.7–11.9ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 8.7 · 92% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vocal cord disorder | 42 | 11.0 8.1–14.9ROR 11.0 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓ | 10.3 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cataract operation | 120 | 10.4 8.7–12.5ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓ | 10.1 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=118 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cancer surgery | 19 | 10.2 6.5–16.1ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓ | 9.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product quality issue | 2,665 | 10.2 9.8–10.6ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓ | 10.0 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 11.7 · 93% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Asthma | 2,199 | 10.1 9.7–10.5ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓ | 9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 11.3 · 78% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Lower respiratory tract congestion | 33 | 10.0 7.1–14.1ROR 10.0 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓ | 9.2 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=16 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wheezing | 1,142 | 9.9 9.4–10.5ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓ | 9.7 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 8.2 · 80% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rehabilitation therapy | 74 | 9.9 7.8–12.4ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓ | 9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=66 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pharyngeal disorder | 55 | 9.8 7.5–12.8ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓ | 9.3 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=25 · 91% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Emergency care | 56 | 9.7 7.4–12.6ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.039 ✓ | 9.2 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=22 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Expired product administered | 619 | 9.6 8.9–10.4ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓ | 9.4 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=129 · 97% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bronchial hyperreactivity | 22 | 9.4 6.2–14.3ROR 9.4 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓ | 8.3 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=21 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bronchitis chronic | 44 | 9.2 6.8–12.4ROR 9.2 · calibrated p 0.047 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=36 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Osteosclerosis | 28 | 9.1 6.3–13.3ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.051 | 8.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=28 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 6,392 | 5.8 5.6–5.9ROR 6.6 · calibrated p 0.114 | 5.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.1 · 86% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 4,904 | 1.9 1.8–1.9ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.948 | 1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9 | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.9 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product quality issue | 2,665 | 10.2 9.8–10.6ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓ | 10.0 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 11.7 · 93% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cough | 2,562 | 4.7 4.5–4.8ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.245 | 4.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.7 · 84% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product dose omission issue | 2,445 | 4.4 4.2–4.5ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.285 | 4.3 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.7 · 87% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Asthma | 2,199 | 10.1 9.7–10.5ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓ | 9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 11.3 · 78% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 2,172 | 3.4 3.3–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.473 | 3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.9 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug dose omission | 1,998 | 6.1 5.8–6.4ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.129 | 6.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 8.6 · 94% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 1,598 | 0.9 0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.261 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 0.7 · 87% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malaise (feeling unwell) | 1,588 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.867 | 1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.1 · 86% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wrong technique in device usage process | 1,508 | 17.2 16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=107 · 98% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Device use error | 1,460 | 22.6 21.5–23.8ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓ | 21.7 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=136 · 98% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1,354 | 13.5 12.8–14.2ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 13.1 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 18.1 · 77% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dysphonia | 1,277 | 11.3 10.7–11.9ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 8.7 · 92% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Underdose | 1,248 | 8.8 8.3–9.3ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.046 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 10.7 · 97% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Intentional underdose — n=540, PRR 40.4
- Oxygen supplementation — n=51, PRR 36.9
- Life support — n=20, PRR 18.6
- Total lung capacity decreased — n=40, PRR 12.9
- Increased upper airway secretion — n=123, PRR 12.3
- Inability to afford medication — n=228, PRR 12.0
- Sputum increased — n=48, PRR 11.7
- Vocal cord disorder — n=42, PRR 11.0
- Emergency care — n=56, PRR 9.7
- Osteosclerosis — n=28, PRR 9.1
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Salmeterol Xinafoate ↔ Asthma.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol are dyspnoea, cough, asthma, pneumonia, malaise, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 038e6c40-9421-40ef-874b-8f4d7110a74a, effective 20240111; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,182 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.