← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Letrozole side effects: what 61,227 FDA adverse event reports show

Letrozole · 1,251 reaction terms · 277,655 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Aromatase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

61,227 reports · 81% serious · 6,035 with death outcome · 98% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Letrozole tablets are an aromatase inhibitor indicated for: Adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer (1.1) Extended adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who have receiv.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Letrozole Tablets USP for oral administration contain 2.5 mg of letrozole, USP, a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (inhibitor of estrogen synthesis). It is chemically described as 4,4'-(1 H -1,2,4triazol-1-ylmethylene)dibenzonitrile, and its structural formula is: C 17 H 11 N 5 M.W.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 2Lab value / disease marker 9Not in label — unassessed 28
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,211 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pik3ca-activated mutation182438.0
351.5–545.9ROR 439.3 · calibrated p 4e-13 ✓
187.3 EB05 165.5 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (1.7–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=182not reported in cached trials
Carbohydrate antigen 15-3 increased302226.1
195.5–261.6ROR 227.2 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
134.6 EB05 122.3 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.4 (2.1–2.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=294not reported in cached trials
Carbohydrate antigen 27.29 increased42132.3
92.6–189.0ROR 132.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
91.4 EB05 70.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.9 (2.6–6.0)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=36 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hormone receptor positive breast cancer5998.9
74.0–132.2ROR 99.0 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
74.9 EB05 60.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.3 (1.6–3.1)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=59 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Amaurosis fugax23395.4
82.5–110.3ROR 95.8 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
74.1 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=233 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer metastatic1,99778.3
74.6–82.2ROR 80.9 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
63.7 EB05 61.4 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.3 (2.2–2.4)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 45.1not reported in cached trials
Metastases to chest wall6376.1
57.9–100.0ROR 76.2 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
61.2 EB05 49.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.2–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63not reported in cached trials
Metastases to thorax4573.6
53.3–101.6ROR 73.7 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
59.1 EB05 46.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.3–2.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45not reported in cached trials
Tumour marker abnormal5770.1
52.7–93.2ROR 70.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
57.1 EB05 45.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.5 (1.8–3.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=46 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Metastases to skin16163.8
53.9–75.5ROR 64.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
53.5 EB05 46.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.7–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=161not reported in cached trials
Metastases to pleura15861.2
51.7–72.5ROR 61.3 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
51.6 EB05 45.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (1.7–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=158not reported in cached trials
Metastases to the mediastinum6361.2
46.8–80.0ROR 61.2 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
51.2 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.3–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Metastases to bone2,36757.9
55.5–60.4ROR 60.2 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
49.5 EB05 47.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.9–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.6not reported in cached trials
Pseudocirrhosis4757.2
42.0–77.9ROR 57.2 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
48.1 EB05 37.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer recurrent42953.9
48.7–59.7ROR 54.3 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
46.5 EB05 42.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.5–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=424not reported in cached trials
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma6953.2
41.3–68.6ROR 53.3 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
45.5 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.4–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66not reported in cached trials
Metastases to pelvis7848.2
38.0–61.1ROR 48.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
41.9 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.3–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78not reported in cached trials
Tumour marker increased56545.5
41.7–49.7ROR 45.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
40.2 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (1.9–2.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=481not reported in cached trials
Invasive breast carcinoma4743.9
32.4–59.4ROR 43.9 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
38.4 EB05 30.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.3 (2.2–4.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Metastases to spine37643.2
38.8–48.1ROR 43.5 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
38.3 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.8–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=376not reported in cached trials
Metastases to stomach4039.6
28.6–55.0ROR 39.7 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
35.0 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 5.2 (3.2–8.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Osteosclerosis16339.4
33.5–46.3ROR 39.5 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
35.2 EB05 30.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.7 (2.2–3.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=160not reported in cached trials
Bone marrow infiltration3837.3
26.7–52.2ROR 37.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.2 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.7 (1.8–4.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neutrophil percentage decreased5237.0
27.8–49.3ROR 37.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.1 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 4.4 (3.0–6.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=50 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Metastases to liver1,67436.1
34.3–37.9ROR 37.1 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
32.7 EB05 31.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.4not reported in cached trials
Bone lesion34135.7
31.9–39.9ROR 35.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.3 EB05 29.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.3 (2.0–2.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=334not reported in cached trials
Lymphocyte percentage increased3734.3
24.5–48.2ROR 34.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.8 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 4.6 (2.9–7.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=35 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Carcinoembryonic antigen increased17133.2
28.4–38.8ROR 33.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.2 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.1 (2.6–3.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=171not reported in cached trials
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma24133.2
29.1–37.9ROR 33.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.2 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (1.8–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=241not reported in cached trials
Metastases to bone marrow4432.7
24.0–44.6ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.6 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.5 (2.3–5.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43not reported in cached trials
Metastases to lymph nodes56631.5
28.9–34.3ROR 31.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.9 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.8–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=564not reported in cached trials
Breast conserving surgery4230.6
22.3–41.9ROR 30.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.8 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 4.4 (2.9–6.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Anisocytosis5330.4
22.9–40.2ROR 30.4 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.7 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 5.7 (3.8–8.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51not reported in cached trials
Metastases to lung92929.9
28.0–32.0ROR 30.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.5 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.8–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.8not reported in cached trials
Neoplasm progression2,79329.5
28.4–30.7ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.2 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.6 (2.5–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 26.1 · serious PRR 19.7not reported in cached trials
Primary sequestrum7329.5
23.2–37.5ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.1 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 3.1 (2.3–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73not reported in cached trials
Mean cell haemoglobin increased13129.3
24.5–35.0ROR 29.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.9 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.7 (2.2–3.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=117not reported in cached trials
Metastases to peritoneum19128.2
24.3–32.7ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.1 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.8 (2.3–3.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=191not reported in cached trials
Basophil count increased5124.8
18.7–33.0ROR 24.9 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
23.0 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 4.9 (3.2–7.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=44not reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis6,6139.49.2–9.6signal
Osteonecrosis1,2477.57.1–8.0signal
Thrombocytopenia2,5204.03.8–4.1signal
Anaemia3,3653.93.7–4.0signal
Interstitial lung disease1,0713.93.6–4.1signal
Liver injury2,7923.23.1–3.3signal
Arrhythmia / qt1,3412.42.3–2.5signal
Malignancy2,4332.22.1–2.3signal
Venous thromboembolism1,3722.22.1–2.3signal
Tendon disorder2362.11.9–2.4raised
Depression1,4271.71.7–1.8raised
Kidney injury2,2641.71.6–1.8raised
Fall / fracture1,8071.61.6–1.7raised
Hyponatraemia3801.61.5–1.8raised
Serious infection3,5961.61.5–1.6raised
Heart failure8101.61.5–1.7raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Letrozole as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)7,4103.3
3.2–3.4ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.460
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 3.0 · serious PRR 3.1NCT00553410: 48/2,417 (2.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Nausea5,4862.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.801
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (2.0–2.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.5NCT00553410: 2/2,417 (0.1%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))5,15913.5
13.2–13.9ROR 14.7 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.0 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.9 (2.9–3.0)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 10.9 · serious PRR 9.5NCT00553410: 1/2,417 (0.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4,6682.5
2.4–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.764
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.9–2.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.4NCT00553410: 5/2,417 (0.2%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Malignant neoplasm progression4,49915.8
15.3–16.2ROR 17.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
15.1 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.3 (2.2–2.4)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 11.2 · serious PRR 11.0not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)3,9573.3
3.2–3.4ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.497
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 3.4not reported in cached trials
Alopecia (hair loss)3,6726.5
6.3–6.7ROR 6.8 · calibrated p 0.105
6.4 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.9 (1.8–2.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 7.2 · serious PRR 6.2not reported in cached trials
Pain3,0461.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.791
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.9–2.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00553410: 1/2,411 (0.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)2,9772.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.690
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.9–2.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.4NCT00553410: 48/2,417 (2.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,9351.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.842
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.8 (1.8–1.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00553410: 5/2,417 (0.2%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Neoplasm progression2,79329.5
28.4–30.7ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.2 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.6 (2.5–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 26.1 · serious PRR 19.7not reported in cached trials
Vomiting2,7762.0
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.989
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.0 (1.9–2.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.9NCT00553410: 1/2,417 (0.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Death2,6821.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.352
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 2.5 (2.4–2.6)
Outcome field, not a reactionage-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 0.8NCT01272037: 1/2,062 (0.0%) on Letrozole (serious AE)
Headache2,4771.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.556
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Aromatase Inhibitors: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.2 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00553410: 5/2,417 (0.2%) on Letrozole (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Letrozole?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Letrozole are fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, diarrhoea, arthralgia, white blood cell count decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Letrozole have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Letrozole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Letrozole causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.