Nystatin Ointment side effects: what 26,052 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Nystatin
Who reports
26,052 reports · 78% serious · 3,612 with death outcome · 62% female
Used for
Nystatin Ointment, USP is indicated in the treatment of cutaneous or mucocutaneous mycotic infections caused by Candidaalbicans and other susceptible Candidaspecies. Nystatin Ointment, USP is not indicated for systemic, oral, intravaginal or ophthalmic use.
What it is
DESCRIPTION Nystatin Ointment, USP is for dermatologic use. Nystatin Ointment, USP for topical use only, contains 100,000 USP nystatin units per gram, in a white petrolatum base. Nystatin is a polyene antifungal antibiotic drug obtained from Streptomyces nursei .
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
- No label text to screen No validated FDA label was retrievable for this product, so the screen could not run. Disproportionality only.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,171 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salpingo-oophorectomy unilateral | 48 | 623.9 427.6–910.5ROR 625.1 · calibrated p 4e-14 ✓ | 306.8 EB05 240.7 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=48 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Total lung capacity increased | 96 | 437.5 341.1–561.1ROR 439.1 · calibrated p 5e-13 ✓ | 267.3 EB05 225.3 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=96 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome | 96 | 182.1 145.9–227.3ROR 182.8 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 144.1 EB05 121.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=96 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Venous pressure jugular increased | 30 | 71.4 49.2–103.8ROR 71.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 63.1 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.5) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sinusitis fungal | 55 | 60.3 45.9–79.3ROR 60.4 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 55.1 EB05 43.9 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Trichoglossia | 26 | 54.4 36.6–80.9ROR 54.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 49.2 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=25 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Jaundice cholestatic | 174 | 41.5 35.7–48.4ROR 41.8 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 39.4 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=174 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypomania | 181 | 41.5 35.7–48.2ROR 41.8 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 39.3 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=181 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder | 51 | 40.0 30.2–53.0ROR 40.1 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓ | 37.6 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=51 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nephrogenic anaemia | 196 | 35.2 30.5–40.6ROR 35.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 33.6 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=196 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Female genital tract fistula | 66 | 32.0 25.1–41.0ROR 32.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.6 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=66 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hyperparathyroidism secondary | 95 | 31.3 25.5–38.5ROR 31.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.0 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=95 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oral candidiasis (oral thrush) | 455 | 29.1 26.5–32.0ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 28.1 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 23.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pelvic mass | 27 | 27.8 18.9–40.8ROR 27.8 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 26.5 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=27 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sepsis neonatal | 26 | 26.8 18.2–39.7ROR 26.9 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 25.6 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=26 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Candida infection (yeast infection) | 518 | 25.8 23.6–28.1ROR 26.3 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 25.0 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 19.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nasal polyps | 149 | 25.6 21.8–30.1ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 24.8 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=149 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sputum increased | 65 | 25.5 19.9–32.6ROR 25.5 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 24.6 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=64 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Kyphosis | 53 | 24.7 18.8–32.5ROR 24.8 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓ | 23.9 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=52 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rhinitis allergic | 130 | 24.2 20.4–28.8ROR 24.3 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓ | 23.5 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=128 · ♀ 92% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rectal prolapse | 34 | 23.3 16.6–32.8ROR 23.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.4 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.5) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oropharyngeal candidiasis | 25 | 22.9 15.4–34.1ROR 22.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 22.0 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Complications of transplanted kidney | 61 | 22.6 17.5–29.1ROR 22.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.9 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=61 · ♀ 36% (drug 62%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutropenic infection | 24 | 20.5 13.6–30.7ROR 20.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 19.7 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood urea abnormal | 23 | 20.4 13.5–30.8ROR 20.4 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 19.5 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 2.0 (1.1–3.6) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=22 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Parainfluenzae virus infection | 37 | 19.7 14.2–27.3ROR 19.7 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 19.0 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=37 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sarcoidosis | 111 | 19.2 15.9–23.2ROR 19.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=110 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic sinusitis | 87 | 19.1 15.4–23.6ROR 19.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.6 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=84 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infection reactivation | 26 | 18.7 12.7–27.5ROR 18.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 18.0 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=26 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oral fungal infection | 62 | 18.6 14.4–23.9ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.1 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=37 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Mucormycosis | 58 | 18.5 14.3–24.0ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.0 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=58 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Candidiasis | 91 | 18.4 14.9–22.6ROR 18.4 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.9 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=72 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pharyngeal ulceration | 29 | 17.9 12.4–25.9ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.3 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=26 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Respiratory symptom | 61 | 17.9 13.9–23.0ROR 17.9 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.4 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=60 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diastolic dysfunction | 67 | 17.7 13.9–22.6ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.3 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bk virus infection | 71 | 17.4 13.8–22.0ROR 17.4 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.0 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=71 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Schizophrenia | 249 | 16.8 14.8–19.0ROR 16.9 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.4 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 12.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rebound acid hypersecretion | 62 | 16.6 12.9–21.3ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.2 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=62 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Tongue ulceration | 68 | 16.5 12.9–20.9ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.1 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=65 · ♀ 84% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vulvovaginal candidiasis | 26 | 16.0 10.8–23.5ROR 16.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 15.3 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | 1,979 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 1.000 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 1,764 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.904 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 1,759 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.879 | 1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 1,634 | 4.1 3.9–4.3ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.328 | 4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 3.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 1,474 | 2.1 2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.969 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 1,443 | 1.3 1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.547 | 1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vomiting | 1,369 | 2.4 2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.844 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 1,235 | 0.8 0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.152 | 0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 1,214 | 1.6 1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.718 | 1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 1.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Death | 1,136 | 1.1 1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.349 | 1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | Outcome field, not a reaction | serious PRR 0.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 1,124 | 2.6 2.5–2.8ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.736 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 1,002 | 1.3 1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.508 | 1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cough | 941 | 2.7 2.5–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.704 | 2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rash | 931 | 1.7 1.6–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.804 | 1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 2.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage) | 928 | 4.9 4.6–5.2ROR 5.1 · calibrated p 0.227 | 4.9 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Polyene Antifungals: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 3.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Nystatin Ointment?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Nystatin Ointment are nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, pneumonia, dyspnoea, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Nystatin Ointment have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Nystatin Ointment has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Nystatin Ointment causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 711950c4-1889-4acd-ab76-9a16176ce1e4, effective 20200301; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"NYSTATIN OINTMENT" AND openfda.product_type:"HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,211 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
NYSTATIN OINTMENT, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.