← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pioglitazone side effects: what 42,978 FDA adverse event reports show

Pioglitazone · 1,201 reaction terms · 136,216 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

42,978 reports · 71% serious · 4,317 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Pioglitazone tablets are indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in multiple clinical settings [ see Clinical Studies ( 14 ) ]. Important Limitations of Use Pioglitazone tablets exert their antihyperglycemic effect only in the presence of endogenous insulin.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pioglitazone Tablets, USP are a thiazolidinedione and an agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma that contains an oral antidiabetic medication: pioglitazone. Piogli.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Thiazolidinediones, including pioglitazone hydrochloride, cause or exacerbate congestive heart failure in some patients [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ]. After initiation of pioglitaz.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 3Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 25
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,161 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma538294.7
264.8–327.9ROR 298.4 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
181.8 EB05 169.3 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=528 · ♀ 15% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Metastatic carcinoma of the bladder86154.7
121.4–197.2ROR 155.0 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
114.3 EB05 95.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=86not reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer recurrent14784.3
70.7–100.4ROR 84.5 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
71.2 EB05 62.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=145 · ♀ 19% (drug 46%) · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer8,73983.9
82.1–85.6ROR 105.0 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
71.5 EB05 70.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 57.4 · ♀ 17% (drug 46%)NCT02002975: 1/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Ureteric cancer4459.4
43.4–81.2ROR 59.4 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
51.8 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44not reported in cached trials
Bladder neoplasm8023.8
19.0–29.8ROR 23.9 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
22.6 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=80not reported in cached trials
Early satiety8823.6
19.0–29.2ROR 23.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.4 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Necrotising oesophagitis2222.8
14.9–35.0ROR 22.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
21.4 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia20822.7
19.7–26.1ROR 22.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.7 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=208not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary11122.3
18.5–27.0ROR 22.4 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.3 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=111not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder4722.2
16.6–29.8ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.1 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47not reported in cached trials
Transitional cell carcinoma5621.9
16.8–28.7ROR 22.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.9 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary vasculitis2221.1
13.8–32.4ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.9 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Spirometry abnormal2319.8
13.1–30.1ROR 19.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.8 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mite allergy2419.0
12.7–28.6ROR 19.0 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
18.0 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diabetic metabolic decompensation5219.0
14.4–25.1ROR 19.0 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.2 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=52 · ♀ 70% (drug 46%)not reported in cached trials
Diabetic neuropathy17517.7
15.3–20.6ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.1 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=167not reported in cached trials
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive2114.5
9.4–22.3ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.5 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Mycotic allergy2414.3
9.5–21.4ROR 14.3 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.4 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diabetic retinopathy9313.7
11.1–16.8ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.2 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=85NCT02002975: 2/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Adenocarcinoma pancreas3513.6
9.7–19.0ROR 13.6 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.9 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34not reported in cached trials
Diabetic nephropathy6013.6
10.5–17.5ROR 13.6 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.0 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=59 · 100% clinicianNCT02002975: 3/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic7312.8
10.1–16.1ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.3 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73not reported in cached trials
Blood glucose decreased1,20612.5
11.8–13.2ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.2 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.6 · 87% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dust allergy2311.9
7.9–18.0ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.9 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Joint sprain2411.3
7.5–16.9ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
10.3 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion6710.9
8.5–13.8ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
10.4 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67not reported in cached trials
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased50810.0
9.2–10.9ROR 10.1 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.8 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 10.3not reported in cached trials
Neuritis289.0
6.2–13.1ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.053
8.1 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood glucose fluctuation1999.0
7.8–10.3ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.047 ✓
8.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=68 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Insulin resistance358.5
6.1–11.8ROR 8.5 · calibrated p 0.063
7.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=30not reported in cached trials
Macular oedema958.4
6.9–10.3ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.059
8.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=71not reported in cached trials
Hypoglycaemic coma488.2
6.2–10.9ROR 8.2 · calibrated p 0.066
7.7 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48not reported in cached trials
Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar)8018.2
7.6–8.8ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.059
8.0 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.3NCT02002975: 1/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Renal failure chronic1288.1
6.8–9.7ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.065
7.8 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.5not reported in cached trials
Conjunctivitis allergic248.1
5.4–12.2ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.074
7.2 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 46%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pancreatitis chronic388.0
5.8–11.0ROR 8.0 · calibrated p 0.073
7.3 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38not reported in cached trials
Gastrointestinal hypomotility368.0
5.7–11.1ROR 8.0 · calibrated p 0.074
7.3 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Pioglitazone as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (4 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Bladder cancer8,73983.9
82.1–85.6ROR 105.0 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
71.5 EB05 70.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 57.4 · ♀ 17% (drug 46%)NCT02002975: 1/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Nausea2,9761.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.892
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2 · 72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,7301.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.526
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0not reported in cached trials
Death1,5460.9
0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.225
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 0.7NCT02002975: 1/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)1,5151.0
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.274
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4960.6
0.5–0.6ROR 0.5 · calibrated p 0.061
0.6 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.5not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,4701.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.674
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,4211.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.463
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.1NCT02002975: 1/17,651 (0.0%) on Pioglitazone (serious AE)
Dizziness1,4171.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.577
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Decreased appetite (loss of appetite)1,4143.0
2.8–3.1ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.608
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.4 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Weight increased (weight gain)1,3012.9
2.7–3.0ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.654
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 2.7not reported in cached trials
Blood glucose decreased1,20612.5
11.8–13.2ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.2 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.6 · 87% consumernot reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)1,1711.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.665
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Pioglitazone ↔ Bladder cancer.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pioglitazone?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pioglitazone are bladder cancer, blood glucose increased, nausea, weight decreased, diarrhoea, fatigue. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pioglitazone have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Thiazolidinediones, including pioglitazone hydrochloride, cause or exacerbate congestive heart failure in some patients [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ]. After initiation of pioglitaz.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pioglitazone causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.