← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Prasugrel Hydrochloride side effects: what 10,097 FDA adverse event reports show

Prasugrel Hydrochloride · 1,010 reaction terms · 26,311 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

10,097 reports · 75% serious · 857 with death outcome · 35% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Prasugrel tablets are a P2Y 12 platelet inhibitor indicated for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events (including stent thrombosis) in patients with acute coronary syndrome who are to be managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as follows: • Patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) ( 1.1 ).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Prasugrel tablets, USP contain prasugrel, a thienopyridine class inhibitor of platelet activation and aggregation mediated by the P2Y 12 ADP receptor. Prasugrel tablets are formulated as the h.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

BLEEDING RISK • Prasugrel tablets can cause significant, sometimes fatal, bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.2) and Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] . • Do not use prasugrel tablets in patients with active pathological bleeding or a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke [see Contraindications (4.1 , 4.2) ] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 9Likely indication confounding 10Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 15
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 970 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
In-stent coronary artery restenosis50715.9
519.1–987.3ROR 719.5 · χ² 25,922 / p <1e-300
440.8 EB05 347.5 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=50no trial data cached
In-stent arterial restenosis13633.8
340.3–1,180.2ROR 634.6 · χ² 5,798 / p <1e-300
282.9 EB05 175.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Arterial restenosis15295.3
171.9–507.3ROR 295.8 · χ² 3,592 / p <1e-300
194.6 EB05 125.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Vessel puncture site haemorrhage26243.1
162.0–364.9ROR 243.7 · χ² 5,389 / p <1e-300
187.6 EB05 134.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Coronary artery restenosis54204.8
154.9–270.7ROR 205.9 · χ² 9,770 / p <1e-300
174.8 EB05 139.1 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=54no trial data cached
Platelet function test abnormal20199.8
126.3–316.0ROR 200.2 · χ² 3,425 / p <1e-300
155.4 EB05 106.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10no trial data cached
Thrombosis in device284194.9
172.8–219.8ROR 200.5 · χ² 49,849 / p <1e-300
175.9 EB05 159.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=283no trial data cached
Vessel puncture site haematoma16181.0
108.6–301.7ROR 181.3 · χ² 2,469 / p <1e-300
139.1 EB05 90.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Vascular stent thrombosis109117.6
97.0–142.5ROR 118.9 · χ² 11,807 / p <1e-300
109.2 EB05 93.0 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=108 · ♀ 12% (drug 35%)no trial data cached
Puncture site haemorrhage33101.8
71.8–144.3ROR 102.1 · χ² 3,041 / p <1e-300
92.0 EB05 68.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Myocardial rupture1283.9
47.1–149.3ROR 84.0 · χ² 866 / p 1e-190
71.8 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12no trial data cached
Vascular stent occlusion1579.2
47.3–132.5ROR 79.3 · χ² 1,040 / p 1e-228
69.8 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Vascular stent stenosis1261.6
34.7–109.3ROR 61.7 · χ² 637 / p 9e-141
54.9 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Vascular pseudoaneurysm4352.4
38.7–70.9ROR 52.6 · χ² 2,065 / p <1e-300
50.1 EB05 38.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43no trial data cached
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage5345.5
34.7–59.7ROR 45.7 · χ² 2,213 / p <1e-300
43.9 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=53 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Bleeding time prolonged1322.5
13.0–38.9ROR 22.5 · χ² 243 / p 4e-55
21.5 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=9no trial data cached
Stent placement8321.6
17.4–26.8ROR 21.8 · χ² 1,593 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 16.2 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Angina unstable6721.4
16.8–27.2ROR 21.6 · χ² 1,271 / p 1e-278
21.1 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=67no trial data cached
Coronary artery stenosis4819.9
15.0–26.5ROR 20.0 · χ² 836 / p 4e-184
19.6 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=47no trial data cached
Angioplasty1419.6
11.6–33.2ROR 19.6 · χ² 227 / p 2e-51
18.7 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Urinary bladder haemorrhage1918.8
12.0–29.6ROR 18.9 · χ² 300 / p 1e-67
18.2 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Coronary artery occlusion12118.4
15.4–22.0ROR 18.6 · χ² 1,955 / p <1e-300
18.2 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 14.1no trial data cached
Lacunar infarction2118.4
12.0–28.2ROR 18.4 · χ² 325 / p 6e-73
17.8 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21 · ♀ 14% (drug 35%)no trial data cached
Venous occlusion1618.3
11.2–29.9ROR 18.3 · χ² 243 / p 5e-55
17.6 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Coronary arterial stent insertion4418.2
13.5–24.5ROR 18.3 · χ² 692 / p 8e-153
17.9 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=43no trial data cached
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura2917.2
11.9–24.7ROR 17.2 · χ² 422 / p 4e-94
16.8 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=29no trial data cached
Vascular occlusion1716.8
10.5–27.1ROR 16.9 · χ² 236 / p 2e-53
16.1 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Non-cardiac chest pain2415.8
10.6–23.6ROR 15.8 · χ² 315 / p 9e-71
15.3 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22no trial data cached
Acute myocardial infarction21415.1
13.2–17.3ROR 15.4 · χ² 2,788 / p <1e-300
15.0 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Haemorrhage urinary tract1814.8
9.3–23.5ROR 14.8 · χ² 217 / p 2e-49
14.0 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Incorrect storage of drug1214.3
8.1–25.2ROR 14.3 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
12.8 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=12no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)5076.0
5.5–6.5ROR 6.3 · χ² 2,119 / p <1e-300
6.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage47011.7
10.7–12.7ROR 12.2 · χ² 4,564 / p <1e-300
11.6 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.0 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Chest pain4575.1
4.7–5.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 1,522 / p <1e-300
5.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Haemorrhage4539.0
8.3–9.9ROR 9.4 · χ² 3,229 / p <1e-300
8.9 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.6 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)4311.6
1.4–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Contusion4249.2
8.4–10.1ROR 9.6 · χ² 3,088 / p <1e-300
9.1 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1 · ♀ 56% (drug 35%) · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)3310.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 5 / p 0.012
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.6 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)3220.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 23 / p 9e-7
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Nausea3070.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 14 / p 7e-5
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.7no trial data cached
Dizziness3011.3
1.1–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 16 / p 4e-5
1.3 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Thrombosis in device284194.9
172.8–219.8ROR 200.5 · χ² 49,849 / p <1e-300
175.9 EB05 159.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=283no trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)2527.0
6.2–7.9ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,290 / p 8e-283
6.9 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.8 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Headache2460.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 10 / p 6e-4
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.7 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)2281.3
1.1–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
1.3 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.8 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Fall2201.4
1.2–1.6ROR 1.4 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
1.4 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Prasugrel?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Prasugrel are myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, chest pain, haemorrhage, dyspnoea, contusion. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Prasugrel have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: BLEEDING RISK • Prasugrel tablets can cause significant, sometimes fatal, bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.2) and Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] . • Do not use prasugrel tablets in patients with active pathological bleeding or a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke [see Contraindications (4.1 , 4.2) ] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Prasugrel causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.