← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pyrazinamide side effects: what 9,340 FDA adverse event reports show

Pyrazinamide · 1,010 reaction terms · 32,114 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Antimycobacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

9,340 reports · 97% serious · 1,645 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Pyrazinamide is indicated for the initial treatment of active tuberculosis in adults and children when combined with other antituberculous agents. (The current recommendation of the CDC for drug- susceptible disease is to use a six-month regimen for in.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION: Pyrazinamide, USP the pyrazine analogue of nicotinamide, is an antituberculous agent. It is a white crystalline powder, stable at room temperature, and sparingly soluble in water..

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Lab value / disease marker 2No label text to screen 38
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 970 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Tuberculoma of central nervous system952,446.8
1,828.9–3,273.3ROR 2,471.9 · χ² 109,194 / p <1e-300
940.8 EB05 792.4 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=95 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated tuberculosis1692,339.6
1,886.5–2,901.4ROR 2,382.7 · χ² 190,987 / p <1e-300
1,007.3 EB05 886.1 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=169 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Serpiginous choroiditis242,215.0
1,258.3–3,898.8ROR 2,220.7 · χ² 25,460 / p <1e-300
586.6 EB05 414.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=24 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Tuberculosis of eye12466.3
250.3–868.7ROR 466.9 · χ² 4,226 / p <1e-300
239.1 EB05 145.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=12no trial data cached
Tuberculosis of central nervous system44445.0
322.1–614.8ROR 447.1 · χ² 15,864 / p <1e-300
319.2 EB05 247.6 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44 · ♀ 15% (drug 45%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Diaphragmatic injury12435.7
234.7–808.9ROR 436.3 · χ² 3,993 / p <1e-300
230.8 EB05 140.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=12no trial data cached
Meningitis tuberculous90427.8
341.7–535.6ROR 431.9 · χ² 31,762 / p <1e-300
333.3 EB05 279.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=90 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Paradoxical drug reaction513365.2
333.4–400.1ROR 386.4 · χ² 159,683 / p <1e-300
310.1 EB05 288.2 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=507 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Tuberculosis of genitourinary system10295.3
152.7–571.1ROR 295.6 · χ² 2,335 / p <1e-300
174.5 EB05 101.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10no trial data cached
Sideroblastic anaemia16285.8
169.9–480.9ROR 286.3 · χ² 3,774 / p <1e-300
194.7 EB05 127.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=16no trial data cached
Splenic embolism12268.5
147.5–488.6ROR 268.8 · χ² 2,618 / p <1e-300
173.8 EB05 106.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=12no trial data cached
Immune reconstitution syndrome110206.3
169.9–250.6ROR 208.8 · χ² 20,373 / p <1e-300
182.9 EB05 155.9 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=109no trial data cached
Tuberculosis gastrointestinal25192.3
127.8–289.2ROR 192.8 · χ² 4,203 / p <1e-300
156.1 EB05 111.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=25 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Acid fast bacilli infection12184.6
102.5–332.5ROR 184.8 · χ² 1,857 / p <1e-300
134.5 EB05 82.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=12no trial data cached
Cutaneous tuberculosis14184.6
107.0–318.3ROR 184.9 · χ² 2,193 / p <1e-300
138.7 EB05 87.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=14no trial data cached
Disseminated tuberculosis181171.9
148.0–199.7ROR 175.3 · χ² 28,386 / p <1e-300
157.0 EB05 138.7 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=180 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Choroiditis25160.0
106.7–240.0ROR 160.5 · χ² 3,538 / p <1e-300
134.2 EB05 95.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=25 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Peritoneal tuberculosis27148.4
100.6–219.0ROR 148.8 · χ² 3,568 / p <1e-300
126.9 EB05 91.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=27 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Lymph node tuberculosis45144.7
107.1–195.4ROR 145.4 · χ² 5,893 / p <1e-300
128.6 EB05 100.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=46 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Bone tuberculosis22136.9
89.0–210.4ROR 137.2 · χ² 2,668 / p <1e-300
116.2 EB05 80.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=22 · ♀ 15% (drug 45%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary tuberculosis238132.7
116.6–151.0ROR 136.2 · χ² 29,236 / p <1e-300
124.0 EB05 111.4 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=238no trial data cached
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome262124.0
109.7–140.2ROR 127.6 · χ² 30,168 / p <1e-300
116.5 EB05 105.2 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=262 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Pancreatitis haemorrhagic24121.6
80.7–183.4ROR 122.0 · χ² 2,609 / p <1e-300
105.9 EB05 74.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis15119.5
71.1–200.9ROR 119.7 · χ² 1,562 / p <1e-300
99.4 EB05 64.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15no trial data cached
Vitamin b1 decreased12113.1
63.3–202.0ROR 113.2 · χ² 1,164 / p 2e-255
92.3 EB05 56.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=12no trial data cached
Oedematous kidney12106.3
59.6–189.7ROR 106.5 · χ² 1,096 / p 1e-240
87.8 EB05 53.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=12no trial data cached
Toxic optic neuropathy19103.7
65.5–164.1ROR 103.9 · χ² 1,749 / p <1e-300
90.3 EB05 61.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=19no trial data cached
Tuberculous pleurisy21103.6
66.9–160.4ROR 103.8 · χ² 1,942 / p <1e-300
91.0 EB05 62.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=21no trial data cached
Urinary tract inflammation1491.5
53.6–156.1ROR 91.6 · χ² 1,118 / p 2e-245
78.8 EB05 49.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=14no trial data cached
Dandy-walker syndrome1089.7
47.7–168.7ROR 89.8 · χ² 760 / p 2e-167
74.4 EB05 43.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10no trial data cached
Tuberculosis40272.5
65.7–79.9ROR 75.7 · χ² 27,377 / p <1e-300
70.0 EB05 64.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 42.7no trial data cached
Conductive deafness1071.7
38.2–134.5ROR 71.8 · χ² 608 / p 1e-134
61.7 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10no trial data cached
Granulomatous liver disease2169.0
44.7–106.5ROR 69.2 · χ² 1,300 / p 6e-285
63.3 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=21 · ♀ 19% (drug 45%)no trial data cached
Jarisch-herxheimer reaction2168.0
44.1–104.9ROR 68.2 · χ² 1,281 / p 8e-281
62.4 EB05 43.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=19 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hepatitis toxic7767.8
54.1–85.0ROR 68.4 · χ² 4,856 / p <1e-300
64.8 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=77 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Oedematous pancreatitis1562.0
37.1–103.5ROR 62.1 · χ² 817 / p 5e-180
56.2 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15no trial data cached
Central nervous system vasculitis1361.4
35.4–106.5ROR 61.5 · χ² 694 / p 3e-153
55.2 EB05 34.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=13no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms67961.3
56.9–66.0ROR 66.0 · χ² 39,175 / p <1e-300
59.6 EB05 55.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 35.5 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Antipsychotic drug level decreased1460.7
35.7–103.2ROR 60.8 · χ² 743 / p 7e-164
54.9 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14no trial data cached
Optic neuropathy5560.5
46.3–79.0ROR 60.8 · χ² 3,073 / p <1e-300
57.8 EB05 46.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=55 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms67961.3
56.9–66.0ROR 66.0 · χ² 39,175 / p <1e-300
59.6 EB05 55.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 35.5 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug-induced liver injury65548.7
45.2–52.5ROR 52.3 · χ² 29,948 / p <1e-300
47.6 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 28.7 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug interaction6008.5
7.9–9.2ROR 9.0 · χ² 3,990 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.5 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)5993.9
3.6–4.2ROR 4.1 · χ² 1,303 / p 2e-285
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.9 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)5241.4
1.2–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Paradoxical drug reaction513365.2
333.4–400.1ROR 386.4 · χ² 159,683 / p <1e-300
310.1 EB05 288.2 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=507 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)4900.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Vomiting4852.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 373 / p 3e-83
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Nausea4021.1
1.0–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 7 / p 0.003
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.0No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Tuberculosis40272.5
65.7–79.9ROR 75.7 · χ² 27,377 / p <1e-300
70.0 EB05 64.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 42.7no trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)3734.4
4.0–4.9ROR 4.5 · χ² 982 / p 7e-216
4.4 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Hepatotoxicity (liver damage)36637.7
34.1–41.7ROR 39.2 · χ² 12,830 / p <1e-300
37.0 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 22.2 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug resistance35531.5
28.4–34.9ROR 32.7 · χ² 10,306 / p <1e-300
31.0 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.5 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Condition aggravated3322.5
2.2–2.7ROR 2.5 · χ² 293 / p 5e-66
2.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Neuropathy peripheral (nerve damage in hands/feet)2876.8
6.1–7.7ROR 7.0 · χ² 1,426 / p <1e-300
6.8 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.7 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Pyrazinamide ↔ Drug-induced liver injury.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pyrazinamide?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pyrazinamide are drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, drug-induced liver injury, pyrexia, paradoxical drug reaction, vomiting, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pyrazinamide have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Pyrazinamide has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pyrazinamide causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.