← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Riociguat side effects: what 32,388 FDA adverse event reports show

Riociguat · Adempas · 1,127 reaction terms · 156,182 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Adempas

openFDA label

Who reports

32,388 reports · 77% serious · 7,092 with death outcome · 73% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Adempas is a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator indicated for the treatment of adults with: • Persistent/recurrent Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) (WHO Group 4) after surgical treatment or inoperable CTEPH to improve exercise capacity and WHO functional class.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Adempas (riociguat) is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator tablet for oral administration. Riociguat is methyl 4,6-diamino-2-[1-(2-fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo [3,4-b]pyridin-3-yl]-5-pyrimidin.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY Adempas is contraindicated for use during pregnancy because it may cause fetal harm based on animal data [see Contraindications (4.1) , Warnings and Precautions (5.1) , and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ]. Exclude pregnancy prior to the start of treatment with Adempas.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 5Not in label — unassessed 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,087 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pulmonary angioplasty222,804.4
1,062.1–7,405.2ROR 2,806.3 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓
357.9 EB05 249.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary endarterectomy901,024.3
733.9–1,429.7ROR 1,027.2 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
363.1 EB05 304.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=89not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary artery therapeutic procedure20637.4
343.0–1,184.5ROR 637.8 · calibrated p 6e-13 ✓
244.7 EB05 167.3 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Endarterectomy57218.9
162.0–295.6ROR 219.2 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
154.8 EB05 123.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56not reported in cached trials
Diastolic hypotension32156.9
106.6–230.9ROR 157.0 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
117.4 EB05 87.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31not reported in cached trials
Bendopnoea40154.5
109.4–218.2ROR 154.7 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
117.7 EB05 90.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary artery occlusion16129.1
75.4–220.9ROR 129.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
95.6 EB05 62.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Diuretic therapy12127.5
68.6–236.9ROR 127.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
91.4 EB05 55.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Walking distance test abnormal53103.0
77.1–137.6ROR 103.2 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
86.1 EB05 68.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=37not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure increased23100.4
64.7–155.8ROR 100.5 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
81.2 EB05 57.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Dialysis hypotension1399.8
55.6–179.1ROR 99.9 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
77.0 EB05 47.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Transplant evaluation6797.7
75.6–126.3ROR 97.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
82.9 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66NCT00863681: 1/231 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Catheter site vesicles2492.7
60.4–142.2ROR 92.8 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
76.3 EB05 54.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Device wireless communication issue3191.5
62.8–133.3ROR 91.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
76.5 EB05 56.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device maintenance issue6279.8
61.3–103.9ROR 80.0 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
69.6 EB05 56.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=14 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial pressure increased17879.0
67.6–92.3ROR 79.4 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
69.9 EB05 61.7 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=158not reported in cached trials
Catheter management9878.8
63.9–97.1ROR 79.0 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
69.3 EB05 58.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=92 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Catheter site pruritus8973.2
58.8–91.1ROR 73.4 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
64.9 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=80not reported in cached trials
Cardiac failure high output2162.5
40.0–97.9ROR 62.6 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
54.4 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Cardiac output increased1562.1
36.5–105.5ROR 62.1 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
53.1 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Catheter site rash3757.8
41.3–80.9ROR 57.9 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
51.7 EB05 39.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30not reported in cached trials
Thrombectomy2655.8
37.4–83.3ROR 55.8 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
49.6 EB05 35.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 50% (drug 73%)not reported in cached trials
Catheter site irritation2554.9
36.5–82.7ROR 55.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
48.9 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 100% (drug 73%)not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial hypertension1,12654.2
51.0–57.5ROR 56.1 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
50.0 EB05 47.6 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 37.4NCT00810693: 1/63 (1.6%) on Riociguat; 2/126 (1.6%) control (serious AE)
Vascular device occlusion2654.2
36.3–80.8ROR 54.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
48.3 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial pressure abnormal2253.5
34.6–82.7ROR 53.6 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
47.5 EB05 33.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Oxygen consumption increased17953.0
45.6–61.8ROR 53.3 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
48.8 EB05 43.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=138not reported in cached trials
Infusion site infection16952.1
44.5–60.9ROR 52.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
48.0 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · 72% consumerNCT00810693: 1/63 (1.6%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Right ventricular failure49248.4
44.2–53.0ROR 49.1 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
45.0 EB05 41.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.9NCT00810693: 3/63 (4.8%) on Riociguat; 1/126 (0.8%) control (serious AE)
Dizziness exertional5147.6
35.8–63.2ROR 47.7 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.7 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31not reported in cached trials
Catheter site erythema14146.7
39.3–55.3ROR 46.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.3 EB05 37.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=121not reported in cached trials
Paracentesis4145.9
33.5–63.0ROR 46.0 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
42.1 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38not reported in cached trials
Catheter site discharge7245.3
35.6–57.5ROR 45.4 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
41.9 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63not reported in cached trials
Cor pulmonale chronic1244.2
24.6–79.4ROR 44.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
39.1 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11NCT00863681: 1/231 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Infusion site abscess3042.9
29.6–62.0ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
39.3 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20NCT00863681: 1/56 (1.8%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Infusion site warmth7341.8
33.0–52.9ROR 41.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.9 EB05 32.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheterisation cardiac abnormal1640.8
24.6–67.6ROR 40.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
36.9 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–NCT00810693: 1/254 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Infusion site induration8440.6
32.6–50.6ROR 40.7 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
37.9 EB05 31.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge10140.6
33.2–49.6ROR 40.7 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
37.9 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 73% consumernot reported in cached trials
Oxygen therapy9640.5
32.9–49.7ROR 40.6 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
37.8 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=92NCT00863681: 1/109 (0.9%) control (serious AE)

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Riociguat as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (8 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5,7186.6
6.4–6.8ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.072
6.5 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6NCT00810693: 1/126 (0.8%) control (serious AE)
Death5,3994.1
4.0–4.2ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.271
4.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 3.0NCT00863681: 2/231 (0.9%) on Riociguat; 3/109 (2.8%) control (serious AE)
Headache4,5134.7
4.6–4.8ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.206
4.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.7NCT00810693: 20/63 (31.7%) on Riociguat; 25/126 (19.8%) control
Nausea3,7693.1
3.0–3.2ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.516
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2NCT00810693: 10/63 (15.9%) on Riociguat; 16/126 (12.7%) control
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3,5333.6
3.5–3.7ROR 3.9 · calibrated p 0.400
3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3NCT00810693: 1/126 (0.8%) control (serious AE)
Dizziness3,5224.6
4.5–4.7ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.230
4.6 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5NCT00810693: 1/254 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Hypotension (low blood pressure)3,40111.2
10.8–11.5ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
11.0 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 8.0NCT00810693: 1/254 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)2,9672.5
2.4–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.761
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6NCT00810693: 7/254 (2.8%) on Riociguat; 8/126 (6.3%) control
Hospitalisation2,3119.9
9.6–10.4ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
9.8 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5not reported in cached trials
Vomiting2,1202.9
2.8–3.1ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.604
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5NCT00810693: 7/63 (11.1%) on Riociguat; 11/126 (8.7%) control
Cough1,7974.2
4.0–4.4ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.317
4.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0NCT00810693: 3/63 (4.8%) on Riociguat; 13/126 (10.3%) control
Oedema peripheral (swelling of legs/feet)1,7909.6
9.2–10.0ROR 10.1 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 7.8NCT00810693: 14/63 (22.2%) on Riociguat; 14/126 (11.1%) control
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,7663.5
3.4–3.7ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.439
3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.7NCT00810693: 1/254 (0.4%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Fluid retention1,75623.1
22.1–24.2ROR 24.4 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
22.3 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7NCT00863681: 2/231 (0.9%) on Riociguat (serious AE)
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,6702.5
2.4–2.6ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.795
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4NCT00863681: 1/56 (1.8%) on Riociguat (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Riociguat ↔ Hypotension.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Riociguat?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Riociguat are dyspnoea, headache, nausea, diarrhoea, dizziness, hypotension. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Riociguat have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY Adempas is contraindicated for use during pregnancy because it may cause fetal harm based on animal data [see Contraindications (4.1) , Warnings and Precautions (5.1) , and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ]. Exclude pregnancy prior to the start of treatment with Adempas.

Do FAERS signals prove that Riociguat causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.