← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Senna side effects: what 20,946 FDA adverse event reports show

Senna · Onelax Senna · 1,188 reaction terms · 88,077 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Onelax Senna

openFDA label

Who reports

20,946 reports · 84% serious · 3,190 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Directions take preferably at bedtime or as directed by a doctor. Shake Well Before Using.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Lab value / disease marker 10No label text to screen 30
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,148 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Musculoskeletal toxicity17101.6
61.7–167.4ROR 101.7 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
83.8 EB05 55.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=17no trial data cached
Capillaritis2393.8
61.1–143.8ROR 93.9 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
80.2 EB05 56.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Soft tissue mass3172.0
50.0–103.6ROR 72.1 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
64.6 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=31 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Chest wall mass1770.2
42.9–114.7ROR 70.2 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
61.3 EB05 40.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=17no trial data cached
Postmortem blood drug level increased2367.7
44.4–103.3ROR 67.8 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
60.4 EB05 42.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Total lung capacity abnormal2158.4
37.6–90.6ROR 58.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
52.7 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Pulmonary vasculitis2651.7
34.9–76.7ROR 51.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
47.6 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Scan abnormal1748.3
29.7–78.6ROR 48.4 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
44.0 EB05 29.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=17no trial data cached
Mite allergy2947.6
32.8–69.1ROR 47.7 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
44.2 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=29 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Spirometry abnormal2646.3
31.3–68.6ROR 46.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
43.0 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Clostridium test positive9244.0
35.8–54.2ROR 44.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
41.9 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=91 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Immunisation1843.3
27.0–69.4ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
39.9 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=18no trial data cached
Oesophageal perforation3240.0
28.1–57.0ROR 40.1 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
37.7 EB05 28.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Temperature regulation disorder8239.0
31.3–48.6ROR 39.1 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
37.2 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=82 · ♀ 100% (drug 54%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood albumin abnormal1836.4
22.7–58.2ROR 36.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
34.0 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18no trial data cached
Mycotic allergy2935.6
24.6–51.6ROR 35.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
33.7 EB05 24.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=29 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive2434.1
22.7–51.2ROR 34.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
32.2 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Cardiospasm1833.3
20.8–53.3ROR 33.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
31.3 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=18no trial data cached
Dust allergy3032.1
22.3–46.2ROR 32.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
30.6 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Multimorbidity3328.1
19.9–39.7ROR 28.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
27.0 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=33 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Palmoplantar keratoderma1927.1
17.2–42.7ROR 27.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
25.8 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=18no trial data cached
Superinfection3826.0
18.8–35.8ROR 26.0 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
25.0 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=38 · ♀ 25% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood alkaline phosphatase abnormal2124.0
15.6–37.0ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
23.0 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Glomerular filtration rate increased1923.9
15.2–37.7ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.9 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19no trial data cached
Neuritis3221.2
15.0–30.1ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.6 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder2220.9
13.7–31.8ROR 20.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.1 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=22no trial data cached
Conjunctivitis allergic2819.5
13.4–28.3ROR 19.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.9 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Lung consolidation5319.2
14.6–25.2ROR 19.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.7 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=53 · ♀ 24% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Intestinal pseudo-obstruction1517.7
10.6–29.5ROR 17.7 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
16.7 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15no trial data cached
Neutropenic sepsis12217.3
14.5–20.7ROR 17.4 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.0 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.7 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cleft palate3116.3
11.4–23.2ROR 16.3 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.8 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=31 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Pleuritic pain4416.1
12.0–21.7ROR 16.2 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.7 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44no trial data cached
Blood bilirubin abnormal1915.2
9.7–23.9ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
14.4 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19no trial data cached
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis3015.1
10.5–21.6ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
14.6 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Monocyte count decreased1815.1
9.5–24.0ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
14.2 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18no trial data cached
Nephrogenic anaemia6915.0
11.8–19.0ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.7 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=69no trial data cached
Food allergy11114.9
12.4–18.0ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.6 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=109 · ♀ 100% (drug 54%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Perirectal abscess1614.5
8.9–23.8ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.5 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=16no trial data cached
Transplant failure3213.3
9.4–18.8ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Excessive eye blinking1913.0
8.3–20.5ROR 13.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
12.0 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=17no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea1,4451.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.886
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)1,4261.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.888
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Constipation1,2015.6
5.3–5.9ROR 5.9 · calibrated p 0.160
5.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,1222.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.967
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,1091.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.810
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Death1,0851.3
1.2–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.491
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Vomiting1,0232.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.928
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)9683.0
2.8–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.595
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Fall9202.8
2.6–3.0ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.675
2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)8902.6
2.4–2.7ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.753
2.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Headache8681.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.579
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.6 · ♀ 80% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Pain8531.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.579
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)7852.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.985
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)7790.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.240
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Dizziness7441.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.651
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Senna?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Senna are nausea, fatigue, constipation, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Senna have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Senna has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Senna causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.