← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Sildenafil Citrate side effects: what 126,457 FDA adverse event reports show

Sildenafil Citrate · Sildenafil Citrate · 1,262 reaction terms · 442,812 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Phosphodiesterase-5 (pde5) inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Sildenafil Citrate

openFDA label

Who reports

126,457 reports · 67% serious · 18,360 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Sildenafil citrate is indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil citrate is a phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Sildenafil is a pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-one having a methyl substituent at the 1-position, a propyl substituent at the 3-position and a 2-ethoxy-5-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)sulfonyl]phenyl group at the 5-position.

PubChem CID 135398744 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 10Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 20
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,222 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Semen volume increased102436.2
300.6–633.1ROR 436.5 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
116.6 EB05 98.8 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cyanopsia373268.2
227.4–316.4ROR 269.0 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
101.3 EB05 93.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=138 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage ii77156.4
114.4–213.9ROR 156.5 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
78.7 EB05 65.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage iii77100.9
75.9–134.1ROR 101.0 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
61.7 EB05 51.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage iv10394.0
73.8–119.8ROR 94.1 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
59.3 EB05 50.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=103 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device wireless communication issue8991.5
70.6–118.7ROR 91.6 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
58.2 EB05 48.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheter site pruritus28379.2
68.7–91.2ROR 79.3 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
53.4 EB05 48.4 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=242 · ♀ 85% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma in situ39174.5
66.1–84.0ROR 74.7 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
51.3 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=391 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheter management27974.1
64.3–85.3ROR 74.2 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
51.0 EB05 46.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=265 · ♀ 73% (drug 45%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage i8372.1
55.7–93.4ROR 72.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
49.7 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=83 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheter site irritation9368.1
53.4–86.7ROR 68.1 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
47.8 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=83 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Painful erection19464.1
54.3–75.7ROR 64.2 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
46.0 EB05 40.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=112 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheter site rash11154.0
43.6–66.9ROR 54.1 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
40.5 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Transplant evaluation12352.5
42.8–64.3ROR 52.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
39.7 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=122 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Catheter site discharge26552.5
45.7–60.2ROR 52.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
39.8 EB05 35.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=226 · ♀ 81% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial pressure increased38851.4
45.9–57.6ROR 51.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
39.2 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=336 · ♀ 75% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 2/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Catheter site erythema49250.8
45.9–56.2ROR 51.0 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
38.9 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=410 · ♀ 82% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 1/3,304 (0.0%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Ventilation perfusion mismatch6348.8
36.8–64.6ROR 48.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
37.3 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary arterial hypertension3,31648.7
46.9–50.6ROR 50.0 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
37.7 EB05 36.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 46.7 · serious PRR 32.7 · ♀ 73% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 10/3,304 (0.3%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Device maintenance issue12848.5
39.8–59.1ROR 48.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
37.4 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact♀ 69% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Walking distance test abnormal8446.0
36.1–58.6ROR 46.0 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
35.8 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=70 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Infusion site infection44940.8
36.8–45.2ROR 40.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
32.8 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=242 · ♀ 77% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 4/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Oxygen consumption increased42636.4
32.7–40.4ROR 36.5 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
29.9 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=329 · ♀ 71% (drug 45%)not reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge29534.4
30.4–39.0ROR 34.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 25.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=90 · ♀ 79% (drug 45%) · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Catheter site swelling15834.3
28.9–40.7ROR 34.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
28.4 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=134 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 1/3,304 (0.0%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Spontaneous penile erection10433.1
26.8–40.9ROR 33.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.6 EB05 23.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site warmth19031.0
26.5–36.2ROR 31.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
26.1 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57 · ♀ 76% (drug 45%) · 72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site irritation18929.6
25.3–34.5ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
25.1 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · ♀ 73% (drug 45%) · 73% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site cellulitis7428.3
22.1–36.2ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
24.1 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=53 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% consumerNCT00666198: 3/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Catheter site inflammation8028.0
22.1–35.4ROR 28.0 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Heart failure3,8443.63.5–3.7signal
Serious infection8,3661.81.8–1.8raised
Arrhythmia / qt2,0181.71.7–1.8raised
Gi bleeding1,6361.51.4–1.6raised
Fall / fracture3,3331.51.4–1.5raised
Anaemia2,6211.51.4–1.5raised
Kidney injury3,5631.31.3–1.3raised
Interstitial lung disease7451.31.2–1.4raised
Myocardial infarction1,5601.31.2–1.3raised
Stroke1,6001.11.0–1.1raised
Venous thromboembolism1,2621.00.9–1.0no difference
Depression1,6120.90.9–1.0lower than other drugs
Hyponatraemia4180.90.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Thrombocytopenia1,0600.80.8–0.8lower than other drugs
Liver injury1,4270.80.7–0.8lower than other drugs
Pancreatitis3650.70.7–0.8lower than other drugs

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Sildenafil as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (11 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)13,3254.0
3.9–4.0ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.322
3.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 4.0 · serious PRR 3.7 · ♀ 69% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 10/3,304 (0.3%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)12,7491.6
1.6–1.6ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.756
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.0 · ♀ 10% (drug 45%) · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Headache10,2182.7
2.7–2.8ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.665
2.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 2.7NCT00666198: 1/3,304 (0.0%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Death9,1261.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.844
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Outcome field, not a reactionage-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 1.5NCT00666198: 24/3,304 (0.7%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)7,0481.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.873
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.8 · ♀ 67% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 7/3,304 (0.2%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Nausea6,4881.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.565
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.5 · ♀ 70% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 2/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Dizziness5,8562.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.948
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 2.0NCT00666198: 2/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Pneumonia (lung infection)4,9782.6
2.5–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.755
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 2.3 · ♀ 66% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 2/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Cough4,7652.9
2.8–2.9ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.651
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 2.6 · ♀ 69% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 1/3,304 (0.0%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Malaise (feeling unwell)4,4861.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.784
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 1.7 · ♀ 66% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 2/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,9480.8
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.153
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 0.8 · serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Vomiting3,7971.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.545
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.3 · ♀ 68% (drug 45%)NCT00666198: 6/3,304 (0.2%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Hypotension (low blood pressure)3,7773.2
3.1–3.3ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.555
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 3.0 · serious PRR 2.7NCT00666198: 10/3,304 (0.3%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)
Pain3,7731.0
1.0–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.317
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.2 · serious PRR 1.0NCT00666198: 4/3,304 (0.1%) on Sildenafil (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitors) ↔ Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Sildenafil?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Sildenafil are dyspnoea, headache, diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Sildenafil have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Sildenafil has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Sildenafil causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.