← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Tapentadol side effects: what 33,272 FDA adverse event reports show

Tapentadol Hydrochloride · 1,046 reaction terms · 70,298 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Opioid agonist

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Tapentadol Hydrochloride (Nucynta Er)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

33,272 reports · 90% serious · 20,613 with death outcome · 63% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

NUCYNTA ER (tapentadol) is indicated for the management of: Severe and persistent pain in adults that requires an opioid analgesic and that cannot be adequately treated with alternative options, including immediate-release opioids. Severe and persisten.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

NUCYNTA ER (tapentadol) is an opioid agonist, supplied in extended-release film-coated tablets for oral administration, containing 58.24, 116.48, 174.72, 232.96, and 291.20 mg of tapentadol hydrochloride in each tablet strength, corresponding to 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg of tapentadol free-base, respectively.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF NUCYNTA ER WARNING: SERIOUS LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF NUCYNTA ER See FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION for complete boxed warning . NUCYNTA ER exposes users to risks of addiction, abuse, and misuse, which can lead to overdose and death.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 3Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 5Outcome field, not a reaction 1Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,006 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder181,596.7
666.9–3,822.5ROR 1,597.5 · χ² 7,596 / p <1e-300
303.4 EB05 203.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Polyneuropathy in malignant disease18177.4
105.1–299.5ROR 177.5 · χ² 2,320 / p <1e-300
120.8 EB05 80.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Confusional arousal1985.5
52.9–138.1ROR 85.5 · χ² 1,321 / p 1e-289
70.2 EB05 47.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Post procedural hypothyroidism2067.1
42.3–106.5ROR 67.2 · χ² 1,117 / p 4e-245
57.5 EB05 39.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Post cholecystectomy syndrome2664.1
42.8–95.9ROR 64.1 · χ² 1,406 / p <1e-300
55.9 EB05 40.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ocular pemphigoid1057.5
30.1–109.9ROR 57.5 · χ² 458 / p 8e-102
48.2 EB05 28.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Aspartate aminotransferase1850.3
31.1–81.4ROR 50.4 · χ² 760 / p 1e-167
44.6 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Granulocyte count increased2541.4
27.6–62.0ROR 41.4 · χ² 886 / p 5e-195
37.8 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Toxicity to various agents9,79639.0
38.4–39.7ROR 54.9 · χ² 344,292 / p <1e-300
36.8 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.3not reported in cached trials
Blood immunoglobulin a increased2530.8
20.6–46.0ROR 30.8 · χ² 659 / p 1e-145
28.8 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug dose titration not performed7829.9
23.8–37.5ROR 29.9 · χ² 2,049 / p <1e-300
28.4 EB05 23.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28not reported in cached trials
Degenerative bone disease1928.2
17.8–44.7ROR 28.2 · χ² 452 / p 2e-100
26.4 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Vitamin b12 increased2722.2
15.1–32.6ROR 22.3 · χ² 508 / p 7e-113
21.2 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Electric shock2821.5
14.7–31.3ROR 21.5 · χ² 509 / p 5e-113
20.5 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Convulsive threshold lowered1321.5
12.4–37.3ROR 21.5 · χ² 226 / p 2e-51
20.0 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Glomerular filtration rate increased2620.8
14.1–30.7ROR 20.8 · χ² 455 / p 3e-101
19.9 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug diversion16318.4
15.8–21.5ROR 18.5 · χ² 2,595 / p <1e-300
17.9 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=153 · ♀ 32% (drug 63%) · 76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dactylitis2717.8
12.1–26.1ROR 17.8 · χ² 400 / p 3e-89
17.0 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Overdose5,88817.6
17.2–18.0ROR 21.2 · χ² 90,492 / p <1e-300
17.1 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.8 · 91% consumerNCT00361504: 1/894 (0.1%) on Tapentadol (serious AE)
Allodynia2916.7
11.5–24.1ROR 16.7 · χ² 401 / p 2e-89
16.0 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=29 · ♀ 14% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor increased2615.0
10.2–22.1ROR 15.0 · χ² 318 / p 2e-71
14.2 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breakthrough pain5214.4
10.9–18.9ROR 14.4 · χ² 619 / p 6e-137
13.9 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Accidental overdose71212.5
11.6–13.5ROR 12.8 · χ² 7,388 / p <1e-300
12.3 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.9 · 93% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug abuse1,55211.9
11.3–12.5ROR 12.4 · χ² 15,250 / p <1e-300
11.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.6 · ♀ 41% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Parasomnia1311.9
6.9–20.6ROR 11.9 · χ² 117 / p 2e-27
10.2 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Short-bowel syndrome1211.8
6.7–20.9ROR 11.8 · χ² 106 / p 3e-25
9.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Reflexes abnormal1211.8
6.6–20.8ROR 11.8 · χ² 106 / p 5e-25
9.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Drug screen negative2910.5
7.3–15.2ROR 10.5 · χ² 236 / p 1e-53
9.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–not reported in cached trials
Sepsis neonatal1310.3
6.0–17.9ROR 10.3 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
8.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Intervertebral discitis289.4
6.5–13.7ROR 9.5 · χ² 200 / p 1e-45
8.6 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Post herpetic neuralgia208.9
5.7–13.8ROR 8.9 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30
7.7 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Death11,6438.6
8.5–8.8ROR 12.7 · χ² 80,712 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 5.5 · 92% consumernot reported in cached trials
Joint noise268.6
5.8–12.6ROR 8.6 · χ² 164 / p 9e-38
7.7 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Serotonin syndrome2458.2
7.2–9.3ROR 8.2 · χ² 1,515 / p <1e-300
8.0 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.2not reported in cached trials
Complex regional pain syndrome198.1
5.2–12.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 111 / p 4e-26
7.0 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
White blood cells urine positive227.5
4.9–11.4ROR 7.5 · χ² 116 / p 2e-27
6.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=22 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Therapeutic response increased117.5
4.1–13.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 55 / p 6e-14
5.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Tapentadol as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Death11,6438.6
8.5–8.8ROR 12.7 · χ² 80,712 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 5.5 · 92% consumernot reported in cached trials
Toxicity to various agents9,79639.0
38.4–39.7ROR 54.9 · χ² 344,292 / p <1e-300
36.8 EB05 36.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.3not reported in cached trials
Overdose5,88817.6
17.2–18.0ROR 21.2 · χ² 90,492 / p <1e-300
17.1 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.8 · 91% consumerNCT00361504: 1/894 (0.1%) on Tapentadol (serious AE)
Drug abuse1,55211.9
11.3–12.5ROR 12.4 · χ² 15,250 / p <1e-300
11.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.6 · ♀ 41% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Drug dependence1,0714.2
3.9–4.4ROR 4.3 · χ² 2,581 / p <1e-300
4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · ♀ 40% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,0240.5
0.5–0.5ROR 0.5 · χ² 580 / p 2e-128
0.5 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -1.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.4not reported in cached trials
Pain7560.8
0.7–0.8ROR 0.8 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 0.5NCT00487435: 1/1,154 (0.1%) on Tapentadol (serious AE)
Nausea7240.6
0.5–0.6ROR 0.6 · χ² 231 / p 2e-52
0.6 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.5NCT00487435: 1/1,154 (0.1%) on Tapentadol (serious AE)
Accidental overdose71212.5
11.6–13.5ROR 12.8 · χ² 7,388 / p <1e-300
12.3 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.9 · 93% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)4480.4
0.3–0.4ROR 0.4 · χ² 519 / p 4e-115
0.4 EB05 0.3 · IC025 -1.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.3NCT00487435: 77/1,154 (6.7%) on Tapentadol
Headache4120.4
0.4–0.5ROR 0.4 · χ² 351 / p 1e-78
0.4 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -1.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.4NCT00487435: 151/1,154 (13.1%) on Tapentadol
Dizziness4110.5
0.5–0.6ROR 0.5 · χ² 186 / p 1e-42
0.5 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -1.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.4NCT00487435: 98/1,154 (8.5%) on Tapentadol
Intentional product misuse4002.9
2.6–3.2ROR 2.9 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.0not reported in cached trials
Somnolence (drowsiness)3981.2
1.1–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 1.1NCT00487435: 61/1,154 (5.3%) on Tapentadol

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tapentadol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tapentadol are toxicity to various agents, drug withdrawal syndrome neonatal, pain, nausea, fatigue, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tapentadol have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF NUCYNTA ER WARNING: SERIOUS LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF NUCYNTA ER See FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION for complete boxed warning . NUCYNTA ER exposes users to risks of addiction, abuse, and misuse, which can lead to overdose and death.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tapentadol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.