← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Tobramycin side effects: what 23,907 FDA adverse event reports show

Tobramycin · Bethkis · 1,141 reaction terms · 68,248 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Aminoglycoside Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Bethkis

openFDA label

Who reports

23,907 reports · 77% serious · 2,819 with death outcome · 55% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

BETHKIS is indicated for the management of cystic fibrosis patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Safety and efficacy have not been demonstrated in patients under the age of six years, patients with FEV 1 less than 40% or greater than 80% predicted, or patients colonized with Burkholderia cepacia .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

BETHKIS is a sterile, clear, colorless to pale yellow, non-pyrogenic, aqueous solution with pH and salinity adjusted. BETHKIS is administered by a compressed air driven reusable nebulizer.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 6Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,101 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cystic fibrosis lung33297.2
200.1–441.2ROR 297.6 · χ² 7,030 / p <1e-300
196.4 EB05 146.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=33not reported in cached trials
Cystic fibrosis1,278262.2
246.6–278.8ROR 277.0 · χ² 255,035 / p <1e-300
200.8 EB05 191.8 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=1,237not reported in cached trials
Cystic fibrosis related diabetes26192.1
125.6–293.8ROR 192.3 · χ² 3,889 / p <1e-300
141.2 EB05 101.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=24not reported in cached trials
Choroiditis64180.2
137.7–235.8ROR 180.7 · χ² 9,290 / p <1e-300
143.0 EB05 115.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64 · ♀ 0% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Infective keratitis12178.8
96.1–333.0ROR 178.9 · χ² 1,614 / p <1e-300
120.4 EB05 73.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasis43150.5
108.9–208.0ROR 150.8 · χ² 5,312 / p <1e-300
121.5 EB05 94.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43not reported in cached trials
Acquired factor v deficiency14126.1
72.0–220.8ROR 126.1 · χ² 1,409 / p <1e-300
96.1 EB05 60.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Tracheostomy infection15121.2
70.6–208.0ROR 121.3 · χ² 1,464 / p <1e-300
94.0 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Pelvic kidney1083.9
43.9–160.6ROR 84.0 · χ² 673 / p 1e-148
67.2 EB05 39.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome2981.7
55.8–119.5ROR 81.8 · χ² 2,038 / p <1e-300
71.3 EB05 52.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27not reported in cached trials
Antibiotic level above therapeutic3276.2
53.1–109.4ROR 76.3 · χ² 2,114 / p <1e-300
67.4 EB05 50.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=31 · ♀ 81% (drug 55%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lung infection pseudomonal4270.4
51.4–96.3ROR 70.5 · χ² 2,592 / p <1e-300
63.4 EB05 48.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=39not reported in cached trials
Keratitis fungal1569.7
41.2–118.0ROR 69.8 · χ² 878 / p 4e-193
59.9 EB05 38.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Ventilation perfusion mismatch2068.3
43.4–107.7ROR 68.4 · χ² 1,168 / p 3e-256
60.0 EB05 41.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Keratitis bacterial1164.7
35.1–119.4ROR 64.7 · χ² 584 / p 3e-129
54.8 EB05 32.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Corneal infiltrates2060.7
38.6–95.4ROR 60.7 · χ² 1,042 / p 8e-229
54.0 EB05 36.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pancreatic insufficiency2359.0
38.7–90.0ROR 59.1 · χ² 1,174 / p 1e-257
53.0 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23not reported in cached trials
Burkholderia cepacia complex infection1858.1
36.0–93.6ROR 58.1 · χ² 893 / p 2e-196
51.7 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=18not reported in cached trials
Pseudomonas test positive5056.6
42.5–75.3ROR 56.7 · χ² 2,510 / p <1e-300
52.2 EB05 41.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=38not reported in cached trials
Sle arthritis1652.0
31.4–86.1ROR 52.0 · χ² 707 / p 4e-156
46.6 EB05 30.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Corneal neovascularisation1351.5
29.5–90.2ROR 51.6 · χ² 561 / p 2e-124
45.7 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Increased viscosity of bronchial secretion3449.8
35.3–70.4ROR 49.9 · χ² 1,492 / p <1e-300
46.0 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32not reported in cached trials
Ototoxicity9647.9
39.0–58.8ROR 48.0 · χ² 4,129 / p <1e-300
45.0 EB05 38.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=94not reported in cached trials
Corneal thinning1347.2
27.0–82.5ROR 47.2 · χ² 515 / p 3e-114
42.3 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Sputum increased10143.9
36.0–53.6ROR 44.1 · χ² 3,993 / p <1e-300
41.6 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=84not reported in cached trials
Vitamin k deficiency1943.9
27.7–69.6ROR 43.9 · χ² 718 / p 2e-158
40.3 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Tracheitis3643.6
31.2–60.9ROR 43.6 · χ² 1,386 / p <1e-300
40.7 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34not reported in cached trials
Elbow deformity1642.2
25.5–69.6ROR 42.2 · χ² 574 / p 3e-127
38.6 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Pneumonia pseudomonal6941.7
32.7–53.1ROR 41.8 · χ² 2,575 / p <1e-300
39.4 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=67not reported in cached trials
Respiratory tract irritation4741.4
30.9–55.5ROR 41.5 · χ² 1,731 / p <1e-300
39.0 EB05 30.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33not reported in cached trials
Corneal epithelium defect2539.9
26.7–59.5ROR 39.9 · χ² 869 / p 3e-191
37.2 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · ♀ 76% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mycobacterium chelonae infection3239.8
27.9–56.7ROR 39.9 · χ² 1,120 / p 6e-246
37.3 EB05 27.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Corneal perforation2638.3
25.9–56.7ROR 38.3 · χ² 869 / p 3e-191
35.8 EB05 25.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Forced expiratory volume decreased11537.0
30.7–44.6ROR 37.2 · χ² 3,831 / p <1e-300
35.4 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=107not reported in cached trials
Bacterial disease carrier2936.3
25.1–52.7ROR 36.4 · χ² 923 / p 6e-203
34.2 EB05 25.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=24not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Tobramycin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,0032.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · χ² 1,083 / p 8e-238
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Death1,6991.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · χ² 546 / p 5e-121
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,4072.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · χ² 925 / p 1e-203
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Cough1,2834.0
3.8–4.3ROR 4.2 · χ² 2,952 / p <1e-300
4.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4not reported in cached trials
Cystic fibrosis1,278262.2
246.6–278.8ROR 277.0 · χ² 255,035 / p <1e-300
200.8 EB05 191.8 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=1,237not reported in cached trials
Hospitalisation1,0366.0
5.6–6.4ROR 6.2 · χ² 4,311 / p <1e-300
5.9 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.3not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated9602.8
2.6–3.0ROR 2.9 · χ² 1,117 / p 4e-245
2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.9not reported in cached trials
Infection8655.3
5.0–5.6ROR 5.4 · χ² 3,005 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8550.6
0.5–0.6ROR 0.6 · χ² 297 / p 8e-67
0.6 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0not reported in cached trials
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)7324.2
3.9–4.5ROR 4.3 · χ² 1,807 / p <1e-300
4.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.2not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)6891.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)6841.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 215 / p 6e-49
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tobramycin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tobramycin are infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis, pneumonia, dyspnoea, cough, cystic fibrosis, infection. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tobramycin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Tobramycin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tobramycin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.