← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Vitamin E side effects: what 31,255 FDA adverse event reports show

Vitamin E · 1,193 reaction terms · 158,126 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Vitamin C

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

31,255 reports · 58% serious · 1,699 with death outcome · 68% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Effectively relieves eye irritation,redness, swelling and itchingcaused by styes, chalazionsand blepharitis

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 8No label text to screen 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,153 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide increased61366.4
268.0–500.9ROR 367.1 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓
219.9 EB05 177.3 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy49239.8
173.0–332.5ROR 240.2 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
165.0 EB05 129.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.7 (1.2–2.3)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=48 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy30222.7
147.3–336.8ROR 222.9 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
151.0 EB05 110.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 5.7 (3.3–9.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicolith93217.9
172.4–275.4ROR 218.6 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
158.8 EB05 133.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.6 (1.3–2.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=93 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vaginal flatulence62170.7
129.1–225.6ROR 171.0 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
130.5 EB05 105.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 10.9 (6.9–17.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=62 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy51133.7
99.0–180.6ROR 133.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
107.0 EB05 84.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.8 (1.3–2.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=51 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug therapy50124.2
91.8–168.0ROR 124.4 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
100.8 EB05 79.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.9 (1.4–2.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Post cholecystectomy syndrome40111.1
79.5–155.2ROR 111.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
91.2 EB05 69.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy3184.3
58.0–122.5ROR 84.4 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
71.7 EB05 52.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 5.6 (3.3–9.6)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=31 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Granulocyte count increased4073.4
53.0–101.8ROR 73.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
64.2 EB05 49.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Electric shock6858.4
45.6–74.9ROR 58.6 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
53.0 EB05 43.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Blood immunoglobulin a increased4155.5
40.4–76.3ROR 55.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
50.2 EB05 38.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vitamin b12 increased5348.1
36.4–63.6ROR 48.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
44.2 EB05 35.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=48 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Glomerular filtration rate increased4337.4
27.5–50.9ROR 37.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
35.0 EB05 27.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome5929.6
22.8–38.4ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
28.1 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 2.2 (1.6–3.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=58 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Dactylitis4129.2
21.4–39.9ROR 29.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.7 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Myoglobin blood increased6228.2
21.9–36.4ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.9 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=62 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Female genital tract fistula6727.1
21.3–34.6ROR 27.2 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.9 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 10.5 (6.8–16.3)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intervertebral discitis7326.9
21.3–33.9ROR 26.9 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.7 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=72 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Blood phosphorus increased10125.8
21.1–31.4ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.7 EB05 21.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 2.1 (1.7–2.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=99 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor increased4125.5
18.7–34.8ROR 25.5 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
24.3 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anaemia postoperative4624.3
18.1–32.6ROR 24.3 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
23.3 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 4.1 (2.8–6.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=46 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Hyperphosphataemia7323.9
18.9–30.2ROR 23.9 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
23.0 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.9 (1.4–2.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=73 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intramedullary rod insertion7123.7
18.7–30.0ROR 23.7 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 2.7 (2.0–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=71 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Open reduction of fracture3722.1
15.9–30.6ROR 22.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
21.2 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 3.4 (2.2–5.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Cystocele2721.6
14.7–31.7ROR 21.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.7 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Radiculopathy8221.5
17.3–26.8ROR 21.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.8 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 8.5 (5.9–12.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=82 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle cramp5219.9
15.1–26.2ROR 20.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.2 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Chronic sinusitis10318.9
15.6–23.0ROR 19.0 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
18.4 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 3.0 (2.3–3.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=102 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Blood uric acid increased14417.1
14.5–20.2ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.7 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 2.8 (2.3–3.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=140 · ♀ 44% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Proctitis7017.1
13.5–21.7ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.6 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 9.7 (6.4–14.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=70 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Joint noise4817.0
12.8–22.6ROR 17.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.5 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=47 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Plantar fasciitis8116.5
13.3–20.6ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.1 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=80 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Brain natriuretic peptide increased7416.5
13.1–20.7ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.0 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=73 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Low turnover osteopathy9716.4
13.4–20.1ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.0 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 4.0 (3.1–5.3)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=97 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Spondylolisthesis4015.7
11.5–21.5ROR 15.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
15.2 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 4.3 (2.8–6.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Fracture nonunion3115.4
10.8–22.0ROR 15.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.8 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 3.1 (1.9–4.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=31 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis11514.3
11.9–17.2ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
14.0 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 6.5 (4.9–8.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=101 · ♀ 42% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Total lung capacity decreased3314.1
10.0–19.9ROR 14.1 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.5 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 5.2 (3.1–8.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=33 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Osteosclerosis3213.9
9.8–19.7ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.2 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 4.3 (2.6–6.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Vitamin E as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)2,8022.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.786
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.7NCT00006392: 660/8,737 (7.6%) on Vitamin E; 632/8,696 (7.3%) control
Nausea2,4602.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.958
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)2,2652.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.825
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,1321.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.367
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Headache2,0672.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.901
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.6NCT00006392: 1/8,737 (0.0%) on Vitamin E (serious AE)
Pain1,9242.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.965
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 0.9 (0.9–0.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials
Dizziness1,8092.4
2.3–2.6ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.800
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.7not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,7652.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.971
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.2NCT00006392: 1/8,737 (0.0%) on Vitamin E; 1/8,696 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Arthralgia (joint pain)1,6672.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.695
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.4NCT00006392: 1/8,696 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)1,5322.7
2.6–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.685
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Fall1,4803.0
2.8–3.1ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.597
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.0not reported in cached trials
Weight decreased (weight loss)1,4163.4
3.2–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.477
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.5 (1.5–1.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.8NCT00006392: 1/8,696 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Pain in extremity1,2432.8
2.7–3.0ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.657
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,2351.0
0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.276
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 0.6 (0.6–0.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,2221.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.818
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Vitamin Cs: PRR 0.9 (0.8–0.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Vitamin E?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Vitamin E are fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, headache, pain, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Vitamin E have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Vitamin E has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Vitamin E causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.