← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Biscodyl side effects: what 12,983 FDA adverse event reports show

Biscodyl · Bisacodyl · 1,177 reaction terms · 80,119 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Stimulant Laxative

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Bisacodyl

openFDA label

Who reports

12,983 reports · 88% serious · 2,318 with death outcome · 56% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

for relief of occasional constipation and irregularity this product generally produces bowel movement in 6-12 hours

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 9Lab value / disease marker 5No label text to screen 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,137 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hypokinetic dysarthria163,641.3
1,498.3–8,849.7ROR 3,645.8 · χ² 16,631 / p <1e-300
475.5 EB05 310.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=16no trial arm names this drug
Vaginal flatulence1862,554.4
2,027.0–3,219.0ROR 2,591.5 · χ² 181,376 / p <1e-300
891.0 EB05 788.6 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=186 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Appendicolith1971,763.1
1,440.7–2,157.7ROR 1,790.3 · χ² 163,849 / p <1e-300
774.0 EB05 687.4 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=197 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Antacid therapy611,675.5
1,170.1–2,399.2ROR 1,683.4 · χ² 48,941 / p <1e-300
649.5 EB05 523.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Sleep disorder therapy891,492.5
1,118.3–1,991.8ROR 1,502.8 · χ² 67,721 / p <1e-300
660.8 EB05 553.3 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=89 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Total lung capacity increased100937.1
732.4–1,199.0ROR 944.4 · χ² 58,289 / p <1e-300
530.2 EB05 448.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=100 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Analgesic therapy87641.7
500.6–822.5ROR 646.0 · χ² 39,216 / p <1e-300
415.7 EB05 347.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=87 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Drug therapy83567.5
442.0–728.6ROR 571.1 · χ² 34,192 / p <1e-300
381.7 EB05 317.7 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=83 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Congenital hiatus hernia55534.3
393.8–724.7ROR 536.5 · χ² 21,525 / p <1e-300
351.3 EB05 280.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=55 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Malignant melanoma stage 044519.2
369.6–729.3ROR 521.0 · χ² 16,775 / p <1e-300
334.7 EB05 259.7 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anticoagulant therapy58427.8
320.3–571.3ROR 429.7 · χ² 19,133 / p <1e-300
303.6 EB05 243.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=58 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome100384.8
309.5–478.4ROR 387.8 · χ² 30,525 / p <1e-300
292.8 EB05 247.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=100 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Victim of child abuse42331.2
237.7–461.6ROR 332.3 · χ² 11,176 / p <1e-300
244.0 EB05 188.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=42 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 90% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Child abuse38289.7
205.1–409.1ROR 290.5 · χ² 9,006 / p <1e-300
218.4 EB05 166.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=38 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Bacteroides infection39286.3
203.7–402.4ROR 287.2 · χ² 9,159 / p <1e-300
217.1 EB05 165.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Ivth nerve paralysis34285.1
198.0–410.5ROR 285.8 · χ² 7,925 / p <1e-300
213.1 EB05 159.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Epidural lipomatosis52283.7
211.3–380.9ROR 284.8 · χ² 12,195 / p <1e-300
221.4 EB05 175.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=52 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 90% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Cerebral hypoperfusion66271.7
209.4–352.5ROR 273.1 · χ² 14,976 / p <1e-300
217.7 EB05 177.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=66 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Sedation complication302222.1
197.2–250.2ROR 227.4 · χ² 58,156 / p <1e-300
192.7 EB05 175.1 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=302 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Capillaritis32218.8
151.3–316.5ROR 219.3 · χ² 5,910 / p <1e-300
172.8 EB05 128.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Female genital tract fistula196207.7
179.2–240.8ROR 210.9 · χ² 35,495 / p <1e-300
180.7 EB05 160.4 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=196 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Multiple drug therapy79206.3
163.3–260.6ROR 207.6 · χ² 14,110 / p <1e-300
175.1 EB05 145.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=79 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic101200.1
162.8–246.0ROR 201.7 · χ² 17,602 / p <1e-300
172.2 EB05 145.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=101no trial arm names this drug
Binocular eye movement disorder28179.1
121.3–264.7ROR 179.5 · χ² 4,300 / p <1e-300
145.4 EB05 105.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Total lung capacity abnormal37173.9
123.9–244.0ROR 174.4 · χ² 5,579 / p <1e-300
145.2 EB05 110.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Pulmonary vasculitis41135.8
98.8–186.7ROR 136.2 · χ² 4,932 / p <1e-300
118.4 EB05 91.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Radiculopathy198131.2
113.6–151.5ROR 133.2 · χ² 23,512 / p <1e-300
119.9 EB05 106.5 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=198 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Cerebellar stroke28130.4
88.8–191.7ROR 130.7 · χ² 3,205 / p <1e-300
111.6 EB05 81.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Colonic pseudo-obstruction20123.0
78.1–193.8ROR 123.2 · χ² 2,135 / p <1e-300
103.3 EB05 70.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=20no trial arm names this drug
Creatinine renal clearance decreased282121.6
107.8–137.1ROR 124.3 · χ² 31,227 / p <1e-300
112.2 EB05 101.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=282 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Proctitis192118.7
102.6–137.4ROR 120.5 · χ² 20,754 / p <1e-300
109.4 EB05 97.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=192 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Chronic sinusitis256118.5
104.5–134.4ROR 120.8 · χ² 27,654 / p <1e-300
109.5 EB05 98.7 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=255 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Creatinine renal clearance increased50115.1
86.4–153.3ROR 115.5 · χ² 5,169 / p <1e-300
103.3 EB05 81.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Spirometry abnormal39114.8
83.0–158.9ROR 115.2 · χ² 4,000 / p <1e-300
102.0 EB05 77.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Macular degeneration787114.2
106.5–122.6ROR 121.6 · χ² 82,375 / p <1e-300
106.4 EB05 100.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 75.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Mite allergy42113.8
83.2–155.5ROR 114.2 · χ² 4,278 / p <1e-300
101.5 EB05 78.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=42 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Hyperphosphataemia125101.2
84.6–121.2ROR 102.2 · χ² 11,572 / p <1e-300
93.9 EB05 80.9 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=125 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive4298.8
72.4–134.9ROR 99.1 · χ² 3,738 / p <1e-300
89.4 EB05 69.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=42 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Blood phosphorus increased14993.4
79.3–110.1ROR 94.5 · χ² 12,782 / p <1e-300
87.3 EB05 76.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=148 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Total lung capacity decreased8287.1
69.8–108.8ROR 87.7 · χ² 6,540 / p <1e-300
81.2 EB05 67.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=82no trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

No completed trial with posted adverse-event results was found on ClinicalTrials.gov for Biscodyl (searched BISCODYL).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Constipation1,46811.0
10.5–11.6ROR 12.3 · χ² 13,421 / p <1e-300
10.9 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.8no trial arm names this drug
Nausea1,3522.8
2.6–2.9ROR 3.0 · χ² 1,586 / p <1e-300
2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.2no trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,3181.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 331 / p 3e-74
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.8no trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,1292.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · χ² 679 / p 5e-150
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4no trial arm names this drug
Pain1,0962.9
2.7–3.0ROR 3.1 · χ² 1,382 / p <1e-300
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.8no trial arm names this drug
Vomiting9813.4
3.2–3.6ROR 3.6 · χ² 1,680 / p <1e-300
3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1no trial arm names this drug
Fall8334.1
3.8–4.3ROR 4.3 · χ² 1,940 / p <1e-300
4.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1no trial arm names this drug
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)8282.4
2.2–2.5ROR 2.5 · χ² 669 / p 7e-148
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0no trial arm names this drug
Pneumonia (lung infection)8034.0
3.8–4.3ROR 4.2 · χ² 1,843 / p <1e-300
4.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.7no trial arm names this drug
Macular degeneration787114.2
106.5–122.6ROR 121.6 · χ² 82,375 / p <1e-300
106.4 EB05 100.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 75.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial arm names this drug
Pyrexia (fever)7623.6
3.3–3.8ROR 3.7 · χ² 1,421 / p <1e-300
3.5 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.8no trial arm names this drug
Death7551.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 96 / p 6e-23
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.9no trial arm names this drug
Abdominal pain7545.3
4.9–5.6ROR 5.5 · χ² 2,612 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.4no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)7241.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 127 / p 9e-30
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.5no trial arm names this drug
Hypotension (low blood pressure)6945.6
5.2–6.0ROR 5.9 · χ² 2,643 / p <1e-300
5.6 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.2no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Biscodyl?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Biscodyl are constipation, nausea, pain, vomiting, fall, dyspnoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Biscodyl have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Biscodyl has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Biscodyl causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.