Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone side effects: what 20,673 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Fluoroquinolone antibacterial
Label matched
Ciprofloxacin (Ciprofloxacin)
Who reports
20,673 reports · 65% serious · 1,436 with death outcome · 66% female
Used for
Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial indicated in adults (18 years of age and older) with the following infections caused by designated, susceptible bacteria and in pediatric patients where indicated: • Skin and Skin Structure Infections ( Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
What it is
Ciprofloxacin Tablets, USP are synthetic antimicrobial agents for oral administration. Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, USP, a fluoroquinolone, is the monohydrochloride monohydrate salt of 1-cyclopropyl- 6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)- 3-quinolinecarboxylic acid.
Boxed warning
SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS INCLUDING TENDINITIS, TENDON RUPTURE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM EFFECTS AND EXACERBATION OF MYASTHENIA GRAVIS • Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been assoc.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,151 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Musculoskeletal injury | 67 | 389.4 293.8–516.3ROR 390.7 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓ | 259.8 EB05 211.6 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=65 | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendon disorder | 285 | 46.3 41.1–52.1ROR 46.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 44.1 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=227 | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendon pain | 316 | 44.1 39.5–49.3ROR 44.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 42.2 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=248 · 74% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Peripheral nerve injury | 34 | 41.0 29.1–57.8ROR 41.1 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓ | 38.6 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 38% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Pouchitis | 30 | 36.5 25.4–52.6ROR 36.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 34.6 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendon rupture (torn tendon) | 380 | 32.1 29.0–35.5ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 31.1 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 27.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendonitis | 451 | 30.3 27.6–33.2ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 29.4 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 25.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendon discomfort | 21 | 29.0 18.8–44.7ROR 29.0 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 27.6 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=20 | not reported in cached trials |
| Ligament disorder | 24 | 27.4 18.2–41.0ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 26.2 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | not reported in cached trials |
| Loss of employment | 79 | 27.0 21.6–33.7ROR 27.1 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 26.1 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=76 · ♀ 91% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Rectal abscess | 43 | 26.6 19.6–36.0ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 25.7 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=43 · ♀ 42% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Fistula discharge | 30 | 24.5 17.1–35.2ROR 24.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 23.6 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=26 | not reported in cached trials |
| Skin injury | 76 | 23.9 19.0–30.0ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓ | 23.2 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=74 | not reported in cached trials |
| Female genital tract fistula | 39 | 23.5 17.1–32.3ROR 23.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.7 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=39 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder | 24 | 23.1 15.4–34.6ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 22.3 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · ♀ 46% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Pelvic abscess | 25 | 22.7 15.2–33.7ROR 22.7 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 21.8 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=25 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Joint crepitation | 43 | 22.1 16.4–29.9ROR 22.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 21.5 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Hyperparathyroidism secondary | 53 | 21.7 16.5–28.4ROR 21.7 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 21.1 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=53 | not reported in cached trials |
| Mycobacterium chelonae infection | 15 | 21.1 12.6–35.1ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 20.0 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | not reported in cached trials |
| Tendon injury | 73 | 20.2 16.0–25.4ROR 20.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.7 EB05 16.2 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=63 · 85% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Enterocutaneous fistula | 17 | 20.0 12.4–32.4ROR 20.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 19.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=17 | not reported in cached trials |
| Nephrogenic anaemia | 90 | 19.9 16.2–24.5ROR 20.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.4 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=90 | not reported in cached trials |
| Physical disability | 82 | 19.0 15.3–23.6ROR 19.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.6 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=81 | not reported in cached trials |
| Perirectal abscess | 20 | 18.5 11.9–28.8ROR 18.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.7 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hilar lymphadenopathy | 15 | 17.7 10.6–29.5ROR 17.7 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 | not reported in cached trials |
| Rebound acid hypersecretion | 52 | 17.5 13.3–23.0ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.1 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=52 | not reported in cached trials |
| Anal fistula | 89 | 17.2 13.9–21.2ROR 17.3 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.9 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=86 | not reported in cached trials |
| Neuropathy peripheral (nerve damage in hands/feet) | 1,440 | 15.7 14.9–16.5ROR 16.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 15.4 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 15.0 · 77% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Fistula | 158 | 14.4 12.3–16.9ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 12.1 | not reported in cached trials |
| Epicondylitis | 21 | 14.3 9.3–22.0ROR 14.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 13.5 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | not reported in cached trials |
| Oesophageal spasm | 25 | 13.9 9.4–20.7ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 13.3 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis | 71 | 13.3 10.5–16.8ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 13.0 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=61 | not reported in cached trials |
| Anal abscess | 69 | 13.2 10.4–16.7ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓ | 12.9 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=68 · ♀ 42% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Drug hypersensitivity | 2,482 | 13.1 12.6–13.6ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 13.0 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 6.0 | not reported in cached trials |
| Anorectal disorder | 25 | 12.8 8.6–19.0ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 12.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 | not reported in cached trials |
| Joint noise | 24 | 12.7 8.5–19.0ROR 12.7 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 11.9 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Biliary dyskinesia | 21 | 12.6 8.2–19.3ROR 12.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.6 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome | 17 | 12.5 7.7–20.1ROR 12.5 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=17 | not reported in cached trials |
| Connective tissue disorder | 17 | 12.2 7.6–19.8ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓ | 11.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 | not reported in cached trials |
| Prostatitis | 36 | 12.2 8.8–16.9ROR 12.2 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.6 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=27 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT03354598 — Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult W (N=1671, PHASE3; 12 AE terms posted; arms: Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid; Ciprofloxacin)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug hypersensitivity | 2,482 | 13.1 12.6–13.6ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 13.0 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 6.0 | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain | 1,607 | 2.7 2.5–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.698 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.1 | NCT03354598: 1/833 (0.1%) on Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone (serious AE) |
| Neuropathy peripheral (nerve damage in hands/feet) | 1,440 | 15.7 14.9–16.5ROR 16.8 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 15.4 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 15.0 · 77% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Nausea | 1,411 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.874 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 | not reported in cached trials |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 1,395 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.908 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 2.6 | NCT03354598: 1/827 (0.1%) on Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone (serious AE) |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 1,375 | 3.4 3.2–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.475 | 3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.4 | not reported in cached trials |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 1,324 | 1.7 1.6–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.818 | 1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7 | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 2.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Urinary tract infection (bladder infection) | 1,018 | 6.1 5.7–6.5ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.129 | 6.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 5.3 | not reported in cached trials |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 988 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.837 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Headache | 984 | 1.6 1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.722 | 1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain in extremity | 982 | 3.4 3.2–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.485 | 3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.1 | not reported in cached trials |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 925 | 0.7 0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.130 | 0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.1 | not reported in cached trials |
| Anxiety | 901 | 3.2 3.0–3.4ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.534 | 3.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Asthenia (weakness) | 890 | 2.4 2.3–2.6ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.828 | 2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 2.5 | not reported in cached trials |
| Dizziness | 856 | 1.7 1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.816 | 1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.1 | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Peripheral nerve injury — n=34, PRR 41.0
- Pouchitis — n=30, PRR 36.5
- Ligament disorder — n=24, PRR 27.4
- Loss of employment — n=79, PRR 27.0
- Rectal abscess — n=43, PRR 26.6
- Fistula discharge — n=30, PRR 24.5
- Female genital tract fistula — n=39, PRR 23.5
- Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder — n=24, PRR 23.1
- Pelvic abscess — n=25, PRR 22.7
- Joint crepitation — n=43, PRR 22.1
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolones) ↔ Tendon rupture / tendinitis.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone are drug hypersensitivity, pain, neuropathy peripheral, nausea, diarrhoea, arthralgia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS INCLUDING TENDINITIS, TENDON RUPTURE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM EFFECTS AND EXACERBATION OF MYASTHENIA GRAVIS • Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been assoc.
Do FAERS signals prove that Ciprofloxacin and Hydrocortisone causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 18414c5a-8153-44f7-b27a-90c290af0a23, effective 20260327; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"CIPROFLOXACIN") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,191 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
CIPROFLOXACIN, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.