← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lamotirigine side effects: what 71,199 FDA adverse event reports show

Lamotirigine · Lamotrigine · 1,286 reaction terms · 284,213 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Anti-epileptic Agent, Mood Stabilizer

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Lamotrigine

openFDA label

Who reports

71,199 reports · 81% serious · 8,154 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

—

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3No label text to screen 36
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,246 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
New onset refractory status epilepticus45217.2
147.6–319.6ROR 217.3 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
118.4 EB05 92.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.3 (4.5–9.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Postictal psychosis46124.5
88.1–175.8ROR 124.6 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
84.4 EB05 65.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.9 (5.5–11.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=46 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy12891.3
74.8–111.3ROR 91.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
69.0 EB05 59.5 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 4.1 (3.3–4.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=128 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Multiple-drug resistance51759.0
53.7–64.8ROR 59.4 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
49.1 EB05 45.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.8 (2.6–3.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=423 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Overlap syndrome11055.8
45.5–68.4ROR 55.9 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
46.6 EB05 39.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.1 (5.7–9.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=110 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Partial seizures with secondary generalisation6446.4
35.7–60.5ROR 46.5 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
39.7 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.9 (2.2–3.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=64 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anticonvulsant drug level above therapeutic8041.1
32.5–51.9ROR 41.1 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
35.8 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.5 (2.0–3.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=78no trial arm names this drug
Developmental hip dysplasia9738.7
31.3–47.8ROR 38.7 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
34.0 EB05 28.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.7 (4.5–7.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=97no trial arm names this drug
Sjs-ten overlap7538.4
30.2–48.9ROR 38.5 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
33.8 EB05 27.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.5 (5.0–8.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=75 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Toxic optic neuropathy4937.7
28.0–50.8ROR 37.8 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.1 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 15.1 (10.1–22.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=49 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Selective eating disorder9935.8
29.1–44.1ROR 35.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
31.8 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.3 (5.0–7.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=99no trial arm names this drug
Focal dyscognitive seizures12034.5
28.5–41.6ROR 34.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.8 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.3 (1.9–2.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=119no trial arm names this drug
Myoclonic epilepsy15033.3
28.1–39.4ROR 33.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.9 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.9 (2.4–3.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=149no trial arm names this drug
Pleurothotonus9032.2
25.9–40.0ROR 32.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.9 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.2 (4.9–8.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=88 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Exomphalos5331.8
24.0–42.3ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 15.1 (10.3–22.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=51 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Eosinophilic myocarditis6930.6
23.9–39.3ROR 30.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.6 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 15.1 (10.8–21.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=69 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Brugada syndrome9530.1
24.3–37.1ROR 30.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.2 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.4 (5.8–9.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=94 · ♀ 30% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Change in seizure presentation6029.5
22.7–38.5ROR 29.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.0 (2.3–4.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=59no trial arm names this drug
Atonic seizures7229.2
22.9–37.1ROR 29.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.4 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.5 (1.9–3.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=67no trial arm names this drug
Hypospadias18629.1
25.0–33.8ROR 29.2 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.5 EB05 23.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.0 (4.2–5.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=186 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Coarctation of the aorta8728.8
23.1–35.9ROR 28.8 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.1 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.4 (5.8–9.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=86 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anticonvulsant drug level decreased12728.7
23.9–34.4ROR 28.7 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.1 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.7 (2.3–3.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=110no trial arm names this drug
Spina bifida18428.1
24.2–32.7ROR 28.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
25.7 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 4.9 (4.2–5.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=184 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Agitation neonatal8026.9
21.4–33.8ROR 26.9 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
24.6 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.8 (5.2–8.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=80no trial arm names this drug
Anal atresia4426.2
19.3–35.7ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 9.2 (6.3–13.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Facet joint syndrome25726.1
22.9–29.6ROR 26.2 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.0 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.9 (3.4–4.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=257 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Infantile apnoea6625.9
20.2–33.4ROR 26.0 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.7 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 12.8 (9.2–17.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=66 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Respiratory disorder neonatal12925.9
21.6–31.0ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
23.8 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.3 (5.1–7.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=129 · ♀ 41% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Dyspraxia4525.7
19.0–34.9ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
23.5 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 9.7 (6.7–14.1)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Petit mal epilepsy40825.6
23.2–28.3ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
23.6 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.1 (2.8–3.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=398no trial arm names this drug
Anticonvulsant drug level increased13025.5
21.3–30.5ROR 25.5 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.3 (1.9–2.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=128 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Dysmetria4825.4
18.9–34.1ROR 25.4 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
23.3 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.4 (4.6–9.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=48 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Dysmorphism18925.3
21.8–29.4ROR 25.4 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.3 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 4.0 (3.4–4.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=189 · ♀ 38% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Tonic convulsion10523.8
19.5–29.0ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
22.0 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.9 (2.4–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=101 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Lip erosion5523.7
18.0–31.2ROR 23.7 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.8 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.0 (2.2–4.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=55no trial arm names this drug
Foetal anticonvulsant syndrome8923.5
19.0–29.2ROR 23.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.8 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.9 (2.3–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=89no trial arm names this drug
Meningomyelocele4523.5
17.4–31.9ROR 23.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.7 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.7 (5.4–11.0)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=45 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Syndactyly6123.3
18.0–30.3ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.5 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.7 (5.6–10.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=61no trial arm names this drug
Polydactyly8423.1
18.5–28.8ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.3 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.0 (4.7–7.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=84 · ♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Cleft lip and palate8223.0
18.4–28.8ROR 23.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.3 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.2 (4.0–6.7)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=82 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Severe cutaneous reaction3,77215.715.2–16.2signal
Seizure7,09211.010.8–11.2signal
Suicidality6,2927.77.5–7.9signal
Extrapyramidal1,3523.83.6–4.0signal
Depression2,9453.13.0–3.2signal
Hyponatraemia6812.52.3–2.7signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy6752.52.3–2.7signal
Liver injury2,1282.12.0–2.2raised
Arrhythmia / qt1,0121.51.4–1.6raised
Fall / fracture1,9611.51.5–1.6raised
Pancreatitis3171.21.0–1.3raised
Thrombocytopenia7271.00.9–1.0no difference
Serious infection2,3540.90.9–0.9lower than other drugs
Kidney injury1,3870.90.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis6920.80.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Dependence / withdrawal7870.80.7–0.8lower than other drugs

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

No completed trial with posted adverse-event results was found on ClinicalTrials.gov for Lamotirigine (searched LAMOTIRIGINE).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)6,2091.4
1.4–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.594
1.4 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.1)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 2.1no trial arm names this drug
Seizure4,29411.4
11.1–11.8ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓
11.0 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.8 (2.7–2.9)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 8.0 · serious PRR 7.8no trial arm names this drug
Toxicity to various agents3,9287.0
6.8–7.3ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.084
6.9 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 4.6 (4.5–4.8)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 6.0 · serious PRR 4.9 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,4711.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.432
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.2 (3.0–3.3)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 1.3no trial arm names this drug
Drug interaction3,2576.2
5.9–6.4ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.127
6.0 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.3)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 5.5 · serious PRR 4.5no trial arm names this drug
Completed suicide (death by suicide)3,07211.1
10.7–11.5ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
10.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.2 (5.0–5.4)
Outcome field, not a reactionage-adj. PRR 8.7 · serious PRR 7.6 · 98% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)2,9871.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.398
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 1.1no trial arm names this drug
Dizziness2,9811.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.830
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.5 (3.4–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.7no trial arm names this drug
Nausea2,9691.1
1.1–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.381
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.5 (3.3–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.0 · serious PRR 1.1no trial arm names this drug
Rash2,8752.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.944
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.2)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.3no trial arm names this drug
Foetal exposure during pregnancy2,72410.2
9.8–10.6ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.1 (4.9–5.3)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1 · ♀ 40% (drug 66%)no trial arm names this drug
Headache2,7001.3
1.2–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.495
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.4 (3.3–3.6)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.1 · serious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Somnolence (drowsiness)2,5743.8
3.7–4.0ROR 3.9 · calibrated p 0.395
3.8 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.3)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 3.5 · serious PRR 3.8no trial arm names this drug
Depression2,3963.1
3.0–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.570
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.4 (3.3–3.5)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 2.7 · serious PRR 2.6no trial arm names this drug
Vomiting2,3221.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.626
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 3.3 (3.1–3.4)
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.3 · serious PRR 1.3no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lamotirigine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lamotirigine are seizure, toxicity to various agents, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, rash. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lamotirigine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Lamotirigine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lamotirigine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.