← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Mupirocin side effects: what 13,399 FDA adverse event reports show

Mupirocin · 1,122 reaction terms · 60,970 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

RNA Synthetase Inhibitor Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

13,399 reports · 57% serious · 922 with death outcome · 63% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Mupirocin Ointment USP, 2% is indicated for the topical treatment of impetigo due to susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) . Mupirocin Ointment USP, 2% is an RNA synthetase inhibitor antibacterial indicated for the topical treatment of impetigo due to susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Mupirocin Ointment USP, 2% contains the RNA synthetase inhibitor antibacterial, mupirocin.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 2Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 36
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,082 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence1631,808.5
1,443.2–2,266.3ROR 1,830.7 · χ² 134,698 / p <1e-300
758.2 EB05 665.4 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=163 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal vestibulitis17315.9
187.5–532.1ROR 316.3 · χ² 4,171 / p <1e-300
202.8 EB05 134.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Purpura senile13190.9
107.3–339.7ROR 191.1 · χ² 2,020 / p <1e-300
136.4 EB05 84.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Burkholderia test positive13182.3
102.6–323.8ROR 182.4 · χ² 1,937 / p <1e-300
132.0 EB05 82.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Female genital tract fistula172173.7
148.5–203.2ROR 176.0 · χ² 26,392 / p <1e-300
153.6 EB05 135.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=172 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Radiculopathy174110.5
94.8–128.7ROR 111.9 · χ² 17,514 / p <1e-300
102.0 EB05 89.9 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=174 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Macular degeneration759106.4
99.0–114.3ROR 112.7 · χ² 74,070 / p <1e-300
99.3 EB05 93.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 108.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Chronic sinusitis226100.4
87.8–114.7ROR 102.1 · χ² 20,789 / p <1e-300
93.6 EB05 83.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=220 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Proctitis16497.1
83.0–113.6ROR 98.3 · χ² 14,590 / p <1e-300
90.5 EB05 79.5 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=164 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Maternal condition affecting foetus1289.0
49.7–159.2ROR 89.1 · χ² 905 / p 3e-199
74.6 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Tarsal tunnel syndrome1182.0
44.7–150.3ROR 82.0 · χ² 760 / p 1e-167
69.0 EB05 41.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder4873.0
54.7–97.5ROR 73.3 · χ² 3,186 / p <1e-300
67.9 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48not reported in cached trials
Humidity intolerance1770.1
43.1–113.9ROR 70.2 · χ² 1,042 / p 5e-229
62.6 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Teratogenicity1264.5
36.2–114.9ROR 64.5 · χ² 660 / p 7e-146
56.7 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Intercepted product prescribing error3948.5
35.3–66.7ROR 48.6 · χ² 1,713 / p <1e-300
46.1 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary7245.8
36.2–57.8ROR 46.0 · χ² 3,018 / p <1e-300
44.0 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia12241.9
35.0–50.1ROR 42.3 · χ² 4,701 / p <1e-300
40.6 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=122not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion5729.6
22.8–38.4ROR 29.7 · χ² 1,518 / p <1e-300
28.8 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57not reported in cached trials
Seborrhoeic keratosis2729.3
20.0–42.9ROR 29.4 · χ² 697 / p 6e-154
28.3 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Folate deficiency2027.8
17.8–43.2ROR 27.8 · χ² 481 / p 7e-107
26.7 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vaginal discharge16526.1
22.4–30.4ROR 26.4 · χ² 3,894 / p <1e-300
25.6 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=164 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal discharge discolouration2225.3
16.6–38.5ROR 25.3 · χ² 481 / p 6e-107
24.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Paraesthesia oral22625.0
21.9–28.4ROR 25.4 · χ² 5,097 / p <1e-300
24.5 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Cleft lip and palate1723.9
14.8–38.6ROR 23.9 · χ² 345 / p 2e-77
23.0 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Resorption bone increased1223.2
13.1–41.1ROR 23.2 · χ² 230 / p 3e-52
22.0 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Impetigo2122.5
14.6–34.5ROR 22.5 · χ² 404 / p 5e-90
21.7 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=13not reported in cached trials
Oral candidiasis (oral thrush)18422.4
19.4–25.9ROR 22.7 · χ² 3,693 / p <1e-300
22.1 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.0 · ♀ 96% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Bone demineralisation1522.4
13.5–37.3ROR 22.4 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
21.5 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Body temperature abnormal2420.6
13.8–30.8ROR 20.6 · χ² 423 / p 3e-94
20.0 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=24not reported in cached trials
Skin weeping4119.5
14.3–26.5ROR 19.6 · χ² 693 / p 6e-153
19.1 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Cutaneous t-cell lymphoma1418.6
11.0–31.6ROR 18.7 · χ² 214 / p 1e-48
17.7 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge1917.6
11.2–27.6ROR 17.6 · χ² 277 / p 2e-62
16.9 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Infusion site bruising2216.3
10.7–24.9ROR 16.4 · χ² 298 / p 4e-67
15.8 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Infusion site mass1116.3
9.0–29.5ROR 16.3 · χ² 141 / p 7e-33
14.8 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Groin abscess1216.2
9.2–28.7ROR 16.3 · χ² 155 / p 6e-36
15.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease18515.9
13.7–18.3ROR 16.1 · χ² 2,536 / p <1e-300
15.7 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.9not reported in cached trials
Aspergillosis1315.5
9.0–26.7ROR 15.5 · χ² 160 / p 5e-37
14.3 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Staphylococcal skin infection1215.3
8.7–27.0ROR 15.3 · χ² 145 / p 1e-33
13.9 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=8not reported in cached trials
Vestibular disorder1114.1
7.8–25.6ROR 14.2 · χ² 120 / p 2e-28
12.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Perirectal abscess1014.1
7.6–26.3ROR 14.1 · χ² 108 / p 1e-25
12.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Mupirocin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4901.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · χ² 532 / p 6e-118
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)9671.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 319 / p 1e-71
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Nausea9321.8
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 376 / p 5e-84
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.7not reported in cached trials
Pain9142.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 709 / p 2e-156
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Product use in unapproved indication8415.4
5.1–5.8ROR 5.7 · χ² 3,035 / p <1e-300
5.4 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)8051.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0not reported in cached trials
Macular degeneration759106.4
99.0–114.3ROR 112.7 · χ² 74,070 / p <1e-300
99.3 EB05 93.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 108.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Headache7501.9
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 314 / p 1e-70
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8 · ♀ 85% (drug 63%)not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6941.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 200 / p 1e-45
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Rash6052.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 395 / p 4e-88
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease58011.9
11.0–12.9ROR 12.4 · χ² 5,766 / p <1e-300
11.8 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.2not reported in cached trials
Weight decreased (weight loss)5673.2
2.9–3.4ROR 3.3 · χ² 856 / p 2e-188
3.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)5352.4
2.2–2.6ROR 2.5 · χ² 451 / p 3e-100
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5251.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 75 / p 2e-18
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Mupirocin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Mupirocin are nausea, pain, fatigue, macular degeneration, headache, diarrhoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Mupirocin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Mupirocin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Mupirocin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.