← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Oseltamivir Phosphate side effects: what 24,273 FDA adverse event reports show

Oseltamivir Phosphate · 1,114 reaction terms · 86,633 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Influenza neuraminidase inhibitor (nai)

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

24,273 reports · 65% serious · 2,714 with death outcome · 56% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Oseltamivir phosphate capsule is an influenza neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) indicated for: Treatment of acute, uncomplicated influenza A and B in patients 2 weeks of age and older who have been symptomatic for no more than 48 hours. ( 1.1 ) Prophylaxis of influenza A and B in patients 1 year and older. ( 1.2 ) Limitations of Use : Not a substitute for annual influenza vaccination.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Oseltamivir phosphate capsules, USP, an influenza neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI), are available as capsules containing 30 mg, 45 mg, or 75 mg of oseltamivir for oral use, in the form of oseltamivir phosphate, USP.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 8Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,074 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Antacid therapy761,504.4
1,035.2–2,186.3ROR 1,509.1 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓
478.4 EB05 394.7 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=76 · ♀ 23% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Appendicolith2251,276.8
1,038.9–1,569.2ROR 1,288.7 · calibrated p 3e-18 ✓
489.9 EB05 438.5 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=225 · ♀ 8% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Sleep disorder therapy1101,265.3
942.6–1,698.4ROR 1,271.0 · calibrated p 7e-18 ✓
467.8 EB05 398.9 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=110 · ♀ 6% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Analgesic therapy123581.6
462.6–731.3ROR 584.6 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓
328.3 EB05 282.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=123 · ♀ 15% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug therapy117500.4
398.4–628.6ROR 502.9 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
300.0 EB05 257.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=117 · ♀ 15% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Anticoagulant therapy74314.9
241.3–411.1ROR 315.9 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
217.3 EB05 178.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=74 · ♀ 24% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Malignant melanoma stage 047303.1
217.3–422.7ROR 303.7 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
205.2 EB05 160.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Congenital hiatus hernia50251.8
183.7–345.2ROR 252.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
181.2 EB05 142.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Bacteroides infection39153.0
108.8–215.1ROR 153.2 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
122.2 EB05 93.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hepatitis infectious mononucleosis12121.6
66.4–222.6ROR 121.7 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
91.5 EB05 55.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Pulmonary function test abnormal179111.8
95.7–130.6ROR 112.6 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
97.9 EB05 86.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=179 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Delirium febrile1090.6
47.2–173.8ROR 90.6 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
71.3 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Influenza virus test positive2089.6
56.5–142.0ROR 89.7 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
75.5 EB05 51.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–no trial data cached
Purpura senile1187.5
47.1–162.7ROR 87.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
70.2 EB05 41.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
H1n1 influenza10972.1
59.3–87.6ROR 72.4 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
65.8 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=104no trial data cached
Influenza a virus test positive3371.3
50.0–101.7ROR 71.4 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
63.5 EB05 47.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=28no trial data cached
Hyperphosphataemia15970.0
59.6–82.3ROR 70.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
64.3 EB05 56.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=159 · ♀ 14% (drug 56%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood phosphorus increased19064.7
55.8–74.9ROR 65.2 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
59.8 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=189 · ♀ 10% (drug 56%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Chest x-ray abnormal21564.3
56.0–73.9ROR 64.9 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
59.6 EB05 53.2 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=215 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Normal newborn37163.3
57.0–70.2ROR 64.2 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
58.8 EB05 53.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Ear pruritus20754.6
47.4–62.8ROR 55.0 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
51.1 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=205 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Breath sounds abnormal24945.9
40.4–52.1ROR 46.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.4 EB05 39.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=248 · ♀ 86% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Pneumonia influenzal5743.2
33.1–56.4ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
40.6 EB05 32.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=57no trial data cached
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic4342.5
31.3–57.7ROR 42.5 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
39.8 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Tarsal tunnel syndrome1040.9
21.7–77.2ROR 40.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
36.6 EB05 21.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Rhinitis allergic19740.0
34.7–46.2ROR 40.4 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.2 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=195 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Blood lactic acid increased20935.8
31.2–41.1ROR 36.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.3 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=208 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Nasal polyps18233.8
29.2–39.2ROR 34.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
32.5 EB05 28.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=182 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Urinary tract inflammation1332.5
18.7–56.6ROR 32.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
30.1 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Enterocolitis haemorrhagic5331.9
24.2–41.9ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.5 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=53 · ♀ 78% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Total lung capacity decreased4524.9
18.5–33.5ROR 25.0 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
24.0 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 18% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood uric acid increased14922.9
19.5–26.9ROR 23.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.2 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=149 · ♀ 13% (drug 56%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Appendicitis24022.9
20.1–26.0ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
22.3 EB05 20.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.8 · ♀ 11% (drug 56%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Abnormal behaviour96421.4
20.1–22.8ROR 22.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.9 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.0no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder2621.4
14.5–31.5ROR 21.4 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.6 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26no trial data cached
Neuropsychological symptoms1421.4
12.6–36.3ROR 21.4 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
20.2 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Iron deficiency10621.1
17.4–25.5ROR 21.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.5 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=106 · ♀ 6% (drug 56%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Full blood count abnormal24720.7
18.3–23.5ROR 20.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.2 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 23.4 · ♀ 85% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Upper-airway cough syndrome19120.6
17.8–23.8ROR 20.7 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.1 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=187 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged11620.2
16.8–24.2ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.7 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=116 · ♀ 18% (drug 56%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,1452.1
2.1–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.928
2.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Vomiting2,0823.8
3.7–4.0ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.357
3.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
No adverse event1,5907.8
7.4–8.2ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.060
7.7 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Nausea1,5751.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.815
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,3090.9
0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.213
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Influenza1,1979.3
8.8–9.9ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓
9.2 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,0441.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.589
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,0121.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.687
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Abnormal behaviour96421.4
20.1–22.8ROR 22.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.9 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.0no trial data cached
Headache9591.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.533
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)9292.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.869
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)87910.2
9.6–10.9ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.1 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Rash7351.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.628
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Cough6662.1
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.991
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Oseltamivir ↔ Neuropsychiatric events.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Oseltamivir?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Oseltamivir are vomiting, nausea, influenza, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, abnormal behaviour. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Oseltamivir have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Oseltamivir has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Oseltamivir causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.