← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Romosozumab-Aqqg side effects: what 13,496 FDA adverse event reports show

Romosozumab-Aqqg · Evenity · 997 reaction terms · 28,163 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Sclerostin inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Evenity

openFDA label

Who reports

13,496 reports · 58% serious · 724 with death outcome · 93% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

EVENITY is a sclerostin inhibitor indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture, defined as a history of osteoporotic fracture, or multiple risk factors for fracture; or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy. ( 1 ) Limitations of Use: Limit duration of use to 12 monthly doses.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Romosozumab-aqqg is a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2) produced in a mammalian cell line (Chinese Hamster Ovary) by recombinant DNA technology that binds to and inhibits sclerostin. Romosozumab-aqqg has an approximate molecular weight of 149 kDa.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

POTENTIAL RISK OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, STROKE AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH EVENITY may increase the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . EVENITY should not be initiated in patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the preceding year.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 3Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 13Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 12
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 957 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Bone density abnormal462216.9
197.1–238.8ROR 224.6 · χ² 86,817 / p <1e-300
188.7 EB05 174.7 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Pseudarthrosis1392.2
52.7–161.4ROR 92.3 · χ² 1,022 / p 1e-224
77.5 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Tooth resorption1078.2
41.4–147.5ROR 78.2 · χ² 653 / p 2e-144
65.5 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Fracture66156.2
52.1–60.6ROR 59.0 · χ² 34,536 / p <1e-300
54.1 EB05 50.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 26.2no trial data cached
Compression fracture17955.3
47.7–64.1ROR 56.0 · χ² 9,163 / p <1e-300
53.1 EB05 46.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=179no trial data cached
Vertebroplasty1450.4
29.6–85.7ROR 50.4 · χ² 609 / p 1e-134
45.9 EB05 29.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Atypical fracture1744.3
27.4–71.7ROR 44.4 · χ² 658 / p 2e-145
41.2 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=17no trial data cached
Thoracic vertebral fracture7540.6
32.3–51.0ROR 40.8 · χ² 2,783 / p <1e-300
39.2 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=75no trial data cached
Radius fracture6039.5
30.6–51.1ROR 39.7 · χ² 2,160 / p <1e-300
38.1 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=58 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Exostosis of jaw1239.0
22.0–69.1ROR 39.0 · χ² 397 / p 2e-88
36.0 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Spinal compression fracture16631.3
26.9–36.5ROR 31.7 · χ² 4,746 / p <1e-300
30.6 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 31.3no trial data cached
Dental restoration failure1430.7
18.1–52.1ROR 30.8 · χ² 366 / p 6e-82
29.1 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Marasmus2829.4
20.3–42.8ROR 29.5 · χ² 727 / p 2e-160
28.4 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Lumbar vertebral fracture8228.6
23.0–35.5ROR 28.7 · χ² 2,114 / p <1e-300
27.9 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=81no trial data cached
Spinal fracture31024.5
22.0–27.4ROR 25.1 · χ² 6,870 / p <1e-300
24.1 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 24.9no trial data cached
Ulna fracture1523.8
14.3–39.7ROR 23.8 · χ² 301 / p 1e-67
22.8 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=15no trial data cached
Blood parathyroid hormone increased4323.2
17.2–31.3ROR 23.3 · χ² 878 / p 4e-193
22.7 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19no trial data cached
Fractured sacrum1721.6
13.4–34.9ROR 21.7 · χ² 310 / p 1e-69
20.8 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=16no trial data cached
Osteoporotic fracture2419.6
13.1–29.3ROR 19.6 · χ² 400 / p 3e-89
19.0 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=24no trial data cached
Physical deconditioning3119.5
13.7–27.7ROR 19.5 · χ² 518 / p 6e-115
19.0 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31no trial data cached
Dental implantation2019.3
12.4–29.9ROR 19.3 · χ² 324 / p 8e-73
18.6 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Atypical femur fracture3318.3
13.0–25.7ROR 18.3 · χ² 516 / p 2e-114
17.9 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=33no trial data cached
Pathological fracture5617.3
13.3–22.5ROR 17.4 · χ² 835 / p 6e-184
17.0 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=55no trial data cached
Femur fracture29514.9
13.3–16.7ROR 15.2 · χ² 3,779 / p <1e-300
14.7 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Aortic dissection3914.7
10.7–20.1ROR 14.7 · χ² 478 / p 2e-106
14.3 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Humerus fracture4213.6
10.0–18.4ROR 13.6 · χ² 473 / p 3e-105
13.2 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=39no trial data cached
Loose tooth2713.1
9.0–19.1ROR 13.1 · χ² 287 / p 1e-64
12.5 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Hyperaesthesia teeth1012.7
6.8–23.7ROR 12.7 · χ² 96 / p 6e-23
10.6 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Pelvic fracture6112.3
9.6–15.8ROR 12.3 · χ² 617 / p 2e-136
12.0 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 12.3no trial data cached
Wrong product administered4711.1
8.3–14.7ROR 11.1 · χ² 418 / p 4e-93
10.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Groin pain6010.6
8.3–13.7ROR 10.7 · χ² 511 / p 2e-113
10.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=19no trial data cached
Blood calcium decreased7410.3
8.2–12.9ROR 10.3 · χ² 605 / p 7e-134
9.9 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Occupational exposure to product389.2
6.7–12.6ROR 9.2 · χ² 267 / p 2e-60
8.6 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Patella fracture138.7
5.1–15.0ROR 8.7 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
7.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fall7953.7
3.5–4.0ROR 3.9 · χ² 1,601 / p <1e-300
3.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Fracture66156.2
52.1–60.6ROR 59.0 · χ² 34,536 / p <1e-300
54.1 EB05 50.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 26.2no trial data cached
Arthralgia (joint pain)6242.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 487 / p 3e-108
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)5070.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 5 / p 0.014
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.8 · ♀ 73% (drug 93%)no trial data cached
Bone density abnormal462216.9
197.1–238.8ROR 224.6 · χ² 86,817 / p <1e-300
188.7 EB05 174.7 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Hospitalisation4584.7
4.3–5.1ROR 4.8 · χ² 1,328 / p 5e-291
4.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.7 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Headache4571.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 7 / p 0.003
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Product storage error3556.4
5.8–7.1ROR 6.5 · χ² 1,611 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Pain in extremity3141.7
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 82 / p 9e-20
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Death3100.6
0.5–0.6ROR 0.5 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
0.6 EB05 0.5 · IC025 -1.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 0.5no trial data cached
Spinal fracture31024.5
22.0–27.4ROR 25.1 · χ² 6,870 / p <1e-300
24.1 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 24.9no trial data cached
Pain3010.8
0.7–0.8ROR 0.8 · χ² 23 / p 7e-7
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 0.5no trial data cached
Femur fracture29514.9
13.3–16.7ROR 15.2 · χ² 3,779 / p <1e-300
14.7 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 14.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Romosozumab-Aqqg?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Romosozumab-Aqqg are fall, fracture, arthralgia, injection site pain, bone density abnormal, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Romosozumab-Aqqg have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: POTENTIAL RISK OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, STROKE AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH EVENITY may increase the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . EVENITY should not be initiated in patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the preceding year.

Do FAERS signals prove that Romosozumab-Aqqg causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.